한국어 동사와 문장 패턴의 상호작용
The Interaction Between Verbs and Sentence-Patterns in Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Most of the constructionist approaches share important underlyingassumptions that Grammar does not involve any transformation, andsemantics is associated directly with surface form. Although CognitiveGrammar and Construction Grammar share a great deal including theabove, there is one important difference between Cognitive Grammarand Construction Grammar. Goldberg(2006: 224) argues that the constructionis the semantic head of the clause against the idea of Langacker(2005)that the verb is always the semantic head of the clause. In this paper,some of Korean verbs are analyzed within the framework of AccompaniedExperience Network Model, which is based on Neural Theory ofLanguage, and it is suggested that there are three typical ways forKorean verbs to interact with Sentence- patterns. Therefore, Jeong(2009)’sexplanation about this topic has to be complemented by additionalfindings. The results of this study could have a non-trivial impact ondeveloping and modelling self- taught learning intelligence, whichinvolves in the interaction between verbs and sentence-patterns in Korean
Abstract
Most of the constructionist approaches share important underlyingassumptions that Grammar does not involve any transformation, andsemantics is associated directly with surface form. Although CognitiveGrammar and Construction Grammar share a great deal including theabove, there is one important difference between Cognitive Grammarand Construction Grammar. Goldberg(2006: 224) argues that the constructionis the semantic head of the clause against the idea of Langacker(2005)that the verb is always the semantic head of the clause. In this paper,some of Korean verbs are analyzed within the framework of AccompaniedExperience Network Model, which is based on Neural Theory ofLanguage, and it is suggested that there are three typical ways forKorean verbs to interact with Sentence- patterns. Therefore, Jeong(2009)’sexplanation about this topic has to be complemented by additionalfindings. The results of this study could have a non-trivial impact ondeveloping and modelling self- taught learning intelligence, whichinvolves in the interaction between verbs and sentence-patterns in Korean
참고문헌 (17)
- 임지룡, "신체화에 기초한 의미 확장의 특성 연구", 언어과학연구, (40), pp.1~31 (2007), 언어과학회
- 정병철, "시뮬레이션 의미론에 기초한 동사의 의미망 연구" (2009), 한국문화사
- 정병철, "시뮬레이션 모형에 의한 조사 ‘에’의 통합적 연구", 언어과학연구, (55), pp.275~304 (2010), 언어과학회
- 홍사만, "신체어의 다의구조 분석: ‘눈’에 대하여", pp.839~856 (1991), 계명대학교 출판부
- Broccias, Cristiano., "Cognitive Grammar", pp.15~31 (2012), Oxford University Press
- Bybee, Joan L., "Morphology: A Study into the Relation between Meaning and Form" (1985), John Benjamins
- Bybee, Joan L., "Phonology and Language Use" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Fillmore, Charles J., "Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone", Language, 64(3), pp.501~538 (1988)
- Goldberg, Adele E., "Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" (1989), University of Chicago Press
- Goldberg, Adele E., "Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language" (2006), Oxford University Press
- Goldberg, Adele E., "Constructionist Approaches", pp.15~31 (2012), Oxford University Press
- 김철규, "The Metaphorical Meanings of the Korean Adjective chakhan in Korean Newspapers from 1990 to 2011", 담화와 인지, 20(3), pp.89~109 (2013), 담화·인지언어학회
- Kuzar, R., "Sentence Patterns in English and Hebrew" (2012), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Langacker, Ronald W., "Grammar and Conceptualization" (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
- Langacker, Ronald W., "Construction Grammars: Cognitive, Radical and Less So", pp.101~159 (2005), Mouton de Gruyter
- Matsumoto, Y., "On the Extension of Body-part Nouns to Object-part Nouns and Spatial Adpositions", pp.15~28 (1999), CSLI Publications
- Tyler, A., "The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes. Embodied Meaning and Cognition" (2003), Cambridge University Press