불규칙의 인지적 고찰과 학교 문법
A Cognitive Exploration of Irregularity and School Grammar
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
School Grammar always has contained the irregularity of Korean verb conjugation as a learning subject, but the goal and value of the topic has not been clear and the appropriate method for this subject has not been discussed at all. This paper suggests that irregularities found in Korean can be properly explained by the Usage Based Model of Cognitive Grammar, and on this foundation we can find many valuable knowledges related to the problems and issues of conjugation in the context of School Grammar. From the perspective of Cognitive Grammar, the regular pattern has a great advantage in terms of entrenchment and ease of activation, but sometimes there is to be strong motivation to override this choice. We could identify some minor patterns in Korean to be motivated for avoiding ‘homonymic clash’, which means that irregularities always have specific historical origins. In Korean, it is probable that conjugations of regular verbs enjoy unit status through frequent uses, and the irregularity of verbs indicates that each of their conjugating forms has unit status. Owing to the content requirement, we can only posit schemas that are directly analogous to occurring expressions, and only the lower-level schemas are accessible for the sanction of new expression. Therefore we can explain why Korean irregular conjugations need to be learned as units, but not as the results of transformation or phonetic rules. On the foundation of this article's notes, it is suggested that irregularity has to be presented as a dynamic network that has major and minor rules, not as a list that is stable and full of meaningless stuffs that is forced to be memorized.
Abstract
School Grammar always has contained the irregularity of Korean verb conjugation as a learning subject, but the goal and value of the topic has not been clear and the appropriate method for this subject has not been discussed at all. This paper suggests that irregularities found in Korean can be properly explained by the Usage Based Model of Cognitive Grammar, and on this foundation we can find many valuable knowledges related to the problems and issues of conjugation in the context of School Grammar. From the perspective of Cognitive Grammar, the regular pattern has a great advantage in terms of entrenchment and ease of activation, but sometimes there is to be strong motivation to override this choice. We could identify some minor patterns in Korean to be motivated for avoiding ‘homonymic clash’, which means that irregularities always have specific historical origins. In Korean, it is probable that conjugations of regular verbs enjoy unit status through frequent uses, and the irregularity of verbs indicates that each of their conjugating forms has unit status. Owing to the content requirement, we can only posit schemas that are directly analogous to occurring expressions, and only the lower-level schemas are accessible for the sanction of new expression. Therefore we can explain why Korean irregular conjugations need to be learned as units, but not as the results of transformation or phonetic rules. On the foundation of this article's notes, it is suggested that irregularity has to be presented as a dynamic network that has major and minor rules, not as a list that is stable and full of meaningless stuffs that is forced to be memorized.
참고문헌 (49)
- 김영선, "한국어 불규칙 용언의 교수 방법 연구", 우리말연구, (25), pp.163~186 (2009), 우리말학회
- 김완진, "형태론적 현안의 음운론적 극복을 위하여", 동아문화, 11, pp.273~299 (1972), 서울대 문리대 동아문화연구소
- 김정우, "지배음운론의 설명력-‘르’-불규칙 활용의 기술과 관련하여-", 우리말연구, (19), pp.205~235 (2006), 우리말학회
- 김진우, "소위 변격용언의 비변격성에 관하여", 한국언어문학, 8(9), pp.1~11 (1971), 한국언어문학회
- 김태훈, "한국어 용언의 어간과 활용형의 점화효과", 석사, 심리학, pp.1999
- 남기심, "표준 국어문법론" (1993), 탑출판사
- 민현식, "학교문법의 불규칙 활용 교육에 대하여", 선청어문, 19, pp.123~136 (1991), 서울대학교 국어교육과
- 박선우, "불규칙활용의 불규칙성에 대한 검토", 청람어문교육, (30), pp.223~249 (2004), 청람어문교육학회
- 박희진, "한국어 규칙 동사와 불규칙 동사의 심성 어휘집 접근 과정", 인지과학, 23(1), pp.1~23 (2012), 한국인지과학회
- 배영환, "‘오’불규칙 동사와 관련된 몇 가지 문제", 국어국문학, (156), pp.43~70 (2010), 국어국문학회
- 석주연, "외국인 학습자를 위한 불규칙 용언 교육 방법에 대한 일고찰", 이중언어학, (20), pp.159~174 (2002), 이중언어학회
- 성낙수, "불규칙 용언의 학교 문법, ‘한글 맞춤법’에 수용된 양상과 기본형태 분석", 청람어문교육, (38), pp.367~399 (2008), 청람어문교육학회
- 송창선, "‘르’ 불규칙과 ‘러’ 불규칙의 발생 원인", 어문학, (109), pp.123~143 (2010), 한국어문학회
- 이기문, "국어사" (2008), 한국방송통신대학교출판부
- 이기문, "국어사개설" (1961), 민중서관
- 이기문, "국어표기법의 역사적 연구" (1963), 한국연구원
- 이현희, "다’ 語詞의 性格에 대하여-누러다類와 엇더다類를 중심으로", 한신논문집, 2, pp.221~247 (1984)
- 최명옥, "변칙동사의 음운현상에 대하여: p-, s-, t- 변칙동사를 중심으로", 국어학, 14, pp.149~188 (1985), 국어학회
- 최명옥, "변칙동사의 음운현상에 대하여", 어학연구, 24(1), pp.68~110 (1988)
- 최병선, "한글정서법의 실제와 원리" (2003), 경진문화사
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1971), 정음문화사
- 허 용, "다르다’와 ‘달르다’는 무엇이 다른가?", 한국어문학연구, 11, pp.247~266 (2000), 한국외국어대 한국어문학회
- 허 웅, "국어음운학" (1985), 샘문화사
- 요시모토 하지메, "불규칙활용에 대한 한국어 교육적 재고찰", 한국어교육, 23(1), pp.101~122 (2012), 국제한국어교육학회
- Bybee, Joan L, "From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition", Language, 82, pp.711~733 (2006)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Formal Properties of Grammars, In Handbook of Mathematical Psychology", pp.323~418 (1963), Wiley
- Davis, M. D, "Neural responses to morphological, syntactic, and semantic properties of single words: An fMRI study", Brain and Language, 89, pp.439~449 (2004)
- Haegeman, Liliane, "Introduction to Government and Binding Theory" (1991), Basil Blackwell
- Harris, Catherine L, "Psycholinguistic studies of entrenchment, In Conceptual structure, discourse and language" (1998), CSLI Publications
- Hubel, David H, "Eye, Brain and Vision, Scientific American Library 22" (1995), WH Freeman
- Jackendoff, Ray, "Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution" (2002), Oxford University Press
- Joanisse, MF, "the past: Neural activation in frontal and temporal regions during regular and irregular past-tense processing", Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, pp.282~296 (2005)
- Kolb, Bryan, "Fundamentals of Human Neuropsychology" (2008), Worth Publishers
- Langacker, Ronald W, "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume I, theoretical prerequisites" (1987), Stanford University Press
- Langacker, Ronald W, "Semantic motivation of the English auxiliary", pp.29~48 (2011), Motivation in Grammar and the Lexicon
- Langacker, Ronald W, "Essentials of Cognitive Grammar" (2013), Oxford University Press
- Marchman, VA, "Children's productivity in the English past tense: The role of frequency, phonology, and neighborhood structure", Cognitive Science, 21, pp.283~303 (1997)
- Marslen-Wilson, W. D, "Dissociating types of mental computation", Nature, 387, pp.592~594 (1997)
- McClelland, JL, "Rules or connections in past-tense inflections : what does the evidence rule out?", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, pp.465~472 (2002)
- Newman, A. J, "An ERP study of regular and irregular English past tense inflection", Neuroimage, 34, pp.435~445 (2007)
- Orsolini, M, "Universals in morphological representation : Evidence from Italian", Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, pp.1~47 (1997)
- Pinker, S, "Words and Rules : The Ingredients of Language" (1999), Basic Books
- Pinker, S, "The past and future of the past tense", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, pp.456~463 (2002)
- Pulvermüller, Friedemann, "Discrete Combinatorial Circuits Emerging in Neural Networks : A Mechanism for Rules of Grammar in the Human Brain?", Neural Networks, 22(2), pp.161~172 (2009)
- Pulvermüller, Friedemann, "Brain Basis of Meaning, Words, Constructions, and Grammar, In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar", pp.397~416 (2013), Oxford University Press
- Pulvermüller, Friedemann, "The Neuroscience of Language" (2003), Cambridge University
- Rumelhart, D, "On learning the past tense of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing?, In Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition" (1986), MIT Press
- Tyler, LK, "Differentiating lexical form, meaning, and structure in the neural language system", Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, pp.8375~8380 (2005)
- Ullman, MT, "A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system", Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, pp.266~276 (1997)