일제 식민지시기 문학검열과 원본 확정

Abstract

Korean literature in Japanese colonial period was formed in mutual influencing relationship of various intentions and efforts of various subjects such as censorship authorities, printing capital, authors, readers, etc. These various intentions are revealed among texts clearly or as concealed. There were many kinds of texts at that time, depending on the production process such as a manuscript, edited copy, galley(proof copy) for inspection, specimen copy(after printing and before distributing), dispatched copy before inspection(it was, of course, an evasion of the law), reinspected copy after releasing inspection results, etc. Even though it is the same piece of work, it differs depending on the block book. These deviations are the results of variated mutual operations by many kinds of subjects. Therefore, a close examination on comparative research will be necessary. Also, researchers must enforce studies while considering the block book stage even though there are not any plural block books left. Because, some texts could be read only by a few people(only writer, inspector, type-picker, and proof reader) at that time, some were published without going through inspection, and some were permitted at first, but prohibited later on. This paper examined printed texts as basic study for text criticism, by dividing them into copy for inspection(galley and specimen copy), copy in open market, photographic edition, and abroad copy. As a result, the fact was brought up.- the photographic edition which mainly used in actual studies is the most unreliable(mainly because which had erased censorship trace). Also, I was able to assume that the most important text is the copy after censorship mainly possessed in National (Central) Library of Korea.