주자와 쉐플러의 사유구조에 기반한 ‘신념론’ 비교와 교육적 시사점
Comparison and Educational Implications of 'Belief' Based on Zhuxi and Scheffler's System of Thought
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to find clues for solving educational problems while comparing and analyzing belief based on the system of thought of Zhuxi and Scheffler. As a result of the comparison of belief, the common point is, first, the connection between 'belief' and ‘question’. Second, it is to separate ‘belief’ and ‘practice’ at the theoretical level, and to see ‘practice’ as you know in the state of having ‘belief’ at the actual level. The difference is, firstly, that Zhuxi discusses ‘nature’ as a conceptual system and Scheffler discusses ‘rationality’. Second, Zhuxi puts emphasis on realizing as soon as he has the belief that he has nature in his mind as ‘cultivating’ due to his ‘monistic system of thought’, and Scheffler emphasizes the formation of true beliefs through ‘critical dialogue’ due to the ‘dualistic system of thought’. Based on this, first, the clue to solving educational problems that form false beliefs can be found in doubting the possibility of errors through Scheffler's critical dialogue. Second, the clue to solving educational problems in which knowledge and action are separated can be found in doing what one truly knows in a state of belief based on Zhuxi. Third, the clue to solving the problem of giving up without forming a belief can be found in cultivating an attitude of not giving up based on Zhuxi.
Abstract
This study aims to find clues for solving educational problems while comparing and analyzing belief based on the system of thought of Zhuxi and Scheffler. As a result of the comparison of belief, the common point is, first, the connection between 'belief' and ‘question’. Second, it is to separate ‘belief’ and ‘practice’ at the theoretical level, and to see ‘practice’ as you know in the state of having ‘belief’ at the actual level. The difference is, firstly, that Zhuxi discusses ‘nature’ as a conceptual system and Scheffler discusses ‘rationality’. Second, Zhuxi puts emphasis on realizing as soon as he has the belief that he has nature in his mind as ‘cultivating’ due to his ‘monistic system of thought’, and Scheffler emphasizes the formation of true beliefs through ‘critical dialogue’ due to the ‘dualistic system of thought’. Based on this, first, the clue to solving educational problems that form false beliefs can be found in doubting the possibility of errors through Scheffler's critical dialogue. Second, the clue to solving educational problems in which knowledge and action are separated can be found in doing what one truly knows in a state of belief based on Zhuxi. Third, the clue to solving the problem of giving up without forming a belief can be found in cultivating an attitude of not giving up based on Zhuxi.
참고문헌 (23)
- "論語集註大全", ~
- "論語集註", ~
- "中庸章句", ~
- "朱子全書", ~
- "朱子語類", ~
- "晦庵集", ~
- 김휘택, "포스트휴먼과 초연결, 지식과 신념의 차이와 연속성에 관한 연구", 문화와융합, 43(11), pp.1~24 (2021), 한국문화융합학회
- 문석윤, "선진 유학에서 지와 인식의 문제", 철학, 76, pp.31~56 (2003), 한국철학회
- 박준철, "주희(朱熹)의 도덕인식론", 윤리교육연구, (53), pp.185~212 (2019), 한국윤리교육학회[DOI]
- 이승환, "주자 ‘분노’관의 도덕심리학적 고찰", 동양철학, (40), pp.197~216 (2013), 한국동양철학회[DOI]
- 이연정, "주희 지행론 ‘(知行論)’을 통한 교육적 요소 고찰", 범한철학, 99(4), pp.29~50 (2020), 범한철학회[DOI]
- 이찬, "지행문제의 도덕심리학적 이해 ― 주희의 自欺와 眞知에 대한 관점을 중심으로 ―", 철학, (99), pp.23~47 (2009), 한국철학회
- 홍성민, "궁극적 이치와 실천적 앎 — 朱子 致知論의 실천지향성 —", 동양철학연구, (58), pp.193~222 (2009), 동양철학연구회[DOI]
- Hartshorne, C, "Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce" (1960), The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
- Jenßen, L, "From teacher education to practice: Development of early childhood teachers‘ knowledge and beliefs in mathematics", Teaching and Teacher Education, 114, pp.1~13 (2022)
- Pollack, George, "SCHEFFLER AND THE COGNITIVE ENDS OF TEACHING", Educational Theory, 58(2), pp.229~248 (2008)
- Koppelberg, Dirk, "Should We Replace Knowledge by Understanding?: A Comment on Elgin and Goodman's Reconception of Epistemology", Synthese, 95(1), pp.119~128 (1993)
- Lee, Chan, "Self -cultivation, moral motivation, and moral imagination: A study of Zhu Xi's virtue ethics", pp.2008
- Nola, Robert, "Knowledge, belief, critical evaluation and education", Pacific-Asian Education Journal, 22(1), pp.33~44 (2010)
- Reichert, F, "Educational beliefs matter for classroom instruction: A comparative analysis of teachers’ beliefs about the aims of civic education", Teaching and Teacher Education, 98, pp.1~13 (2021)
- Scheffler, Israel, "지식의 조건" (2017), 학지사
- Scheffler, Israel, "Conditions of knowledge: an introduction to epistemology and education" (1983), The University of Chicago Press
- Shun, Kwong-loi, "ZHU XI ON THE ‘INTERNAL’ AND THE ‘EXTERNAL’: A RESPONSE TO CHAN LEE", Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 37(4), pp.639~654 (2010)