The Comparison of the Institution of Precedent Social Enterprise Regulations and Its Implication for a Latecomer
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this article is to compare institutional arrangements between precedent social enterprises with a focus on the change of third sector organizations. Along with this, it is also to give an implication for a latecomer that insufficiently institutionalized social enterprise from the side of precedent countries of social enterprise. Method: The article reviews the policy documents and legal data of the governments and public organizations involving the UK, the US, and South Korea as well as China by applying Krasner’s model of punctuated equilibrium that gives attention to macro, meso, and micro institutions. Chapter 2 explores the paths and types of social enterprise. Chapter 3 discusses the economic environment and regime change, the legalization and legal entity, and the support system and support measure of social enterprise. Chapter 4 discusses the comparison of the in-fluence of multi-leveled institutions. Chapter 5 discusses an implication for a latecomer of social enterprise, China. Results: The article finds the influence of institution on social enterprise and an implication for a latecomer. First, the welfare liberal state with voluntary sector tradition forms the social enterprise as a separate legal entity as the state experiences an economic recession and low employment. Second, the welfare liberal state with non-profit sector tradition makes social enterprise a separable legal entity as the state undergoes economic recession and high employment. Third, the statism-centered state with an underdeveloped third sector forms social enterprise as an inseparable legal entity as the state goes through an economic recession and low employment. China as a latecomer puts together the cases of the precedent nations for its institution-building. Conclusion: This article concludes that the third sector development and character plays a critical role in form-ing social enterprise when state and market address external shock and internal conflict. Institutions tend to per-sist, but the social enterprise is formed as the existing third sector organization encounters an exogenous variable and is mediated by state and market.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this article is to compare institutional arrangements between precedent social enterprises with a focus on the change of third sector organizations. Along with this, it is also to give an implication for a latecomer that insufficiently institutionalized social enterprise from the side of precedent countries of social enterprise. Method: The article reviews the policy documents and legal data of the governments and public organizations involving the UK, the US, and South Korea as well as China by applying Krasner’s model of punctuated equilibrium that gives attention to macro, meso, and micro institutions. Chapter 2 explores the paths and types of social enterprise. Chapter 3 discusses the economic environment and regime change, the legalization and legal entity, and the support system and support measure of social enterprise. Chapter 4 discusses the comparison of the in-fluence of multi-leveled institutions. Chapter 5 discusses an implication for a latecomer of social enterprise, China. Results: The article finds the influence of institution on social enterprise and an implication for a latecomer. First, the welfare liberal state with voluntary sector tradition forms the social enterprise as a separate legal entity as the state experiences an economic recession and low employment. Second, the welfare liberal state with non-profit sector tradition makes social enterprise a separable legal entity as the state undergoes economic recession and high employment. Third, the statism-centered state with an underdeveloped third sector forms social enterprise as an inseparable legal entity as the state goes through an economic recession and low employment. China as a latecomer puts together the cases of the precedent nations for its institution-building. Conclusion: This article concludes that the third sector development and character plays a critical role in form-ing social enterprise when state and market address external shock and internal conflict. Institutions tend to per-sist, but the social enterprise is formed as the existing third sector organization encounters an exogenous variable and is mediated by state and market.
참고문헌 (30)
- Defourny J, "Fundamentals for an International Typology of Social Enterprise Models", International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(6), pp.2469~2497 (2017)
- Abel-Smith B, "The Welfare State : Breaking the Post-war Consensus", The Political Quarterly, 51(1), pp.17~23 (1980)
- Fici A, "Recognition and Legal Forms of Social Enterprise in Europe : A Critical Analysis from a Comparative Law Perspective", European Business Law Review, 27(5), pp.639~667 (2016)
- Eikenberry AM, "The Marketization of the Nonprofit Sector Civil Society at Risk", Public Administration Review, 64(2), pp.132~140 (2004)
- Bacq S., "The Multiple Faces of Social Entrepreneurship : A Review of Definitional Issues based on Geographical and Thematic Criteria", Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23(5), pp.373~403 (2011)
- Lee Won-bong, "Social Enterprise as a New PUBLIC VALUE Implementation", Public Value, 4(2), pp.1~6 (2019), J-INSTITUTE
- Calderini M, "The Social Impact Investment Race : Toward an Interpretative Framework", European Business Review, 30(1), pp.66~81 (2018)
- 김점남, "The Implications of Corporate Philosophy and Shared Value for SOCIAL VALUE Creation", Public Value, 5(2), pp.13~22 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- Defourny J, "Emerging Models of Social Enterprise in Eastern Asia : A Cross-country Analysis", Social Enterprise Journal, 7(1), pp.86~111 (2011)
- Hsu C, "Social Entrepreneurial Intentions and Its Influential Factors : A Comparison of Students in Taiwan and Hong Kong", Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(3), pp.385~395 (2019)
- Haddad MA, "A State-in-society Approach to the Nonprofit Sector : Welfare Services in Japan", International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(1), pp.26~47 (2011)
- Kerlin JA, "A Comparative Analysis of the Global Emergence of Social Enterprise", International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(2), pp.162~179 (2010)
- Sepulveda L, "Social Enterprise-A New Phenomenon in the Field of Economic and Social Welfare?", Social Policy & Administration, 49(7), pp.842~861 (2015)
- Lavišius T., "Social Enterprises: Does the Legal Form Matter?", Social Transformations in Contemporary Society, 1(4), pp.132~141 (2016)
- Fici A, "Recognition and Legal Forms of Social Enterprise in Europe : A Critical Analysis from a Comparative Law Perspective", European Business Law Review, 27(5), pp.639~667 (2016)
- Wieland H, "Toward a Service (Eco) Systems Perspective on Value Creation", International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 3(3), pp.12~25 (2012)
- Sodhi MS, "Social Enterprises as Supply-chain Enablers for the Poor", Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 45(4), pp.146~153 (2011)
- Young D, "Defining the Universe of Social Enterprise : Competing Metaphors", International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(5), pp.1307~1332 (2014)
- Defourny J, "Social Enterprise in Europe : Recent Trends and Developments", Social Enterprise Journal, 4(3), pp.202~228 (2008)
- Luo W, "Establishing Social Enterprise Status: A Comparative Study on the Practice of Social Enterprise Certification in Mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan", The China Nonprofit Review, 23(1), pp.86~109 (2019)
- Cooney K, "Public Policies and Work Integration Social Enterprises: The Challenge of Institutionalization in a Neoliberal Era", Nonprofit Policy Forum, 7(4), pp.415~433 (2016)
- Mason C, "Social Enterprises in Quasi-markets : Exploring the Critical Knowledge Gaps", Social Enterprise Journal, 15(3), pp.358~375 (2019)
- Chambré S. M, "Has Volunteering Changed in the United States? Trends, Styles, and Motivations in Historical Perspective", Social Service Review, 94(2), pp.373~421 (2020)
- 방원석, "Entrepreneurial Marketing in the Era of Multicultural METAVERSE", Robotics & AI Ethics, 6(4), pp.55~63 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
- Yang Luo, "Directions for the Korean Social INTEGRATION Policy Index Development", Public Value, 6(1), pp.62~71 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
- Yu C, "A Study on Korean Social Enterprise Certification Supporting Administrative System and Social Innovation by Social Value: Institutional Isomorphism Perspective", China Third Sector Research, 1, pp.220~239 (2019)
- Wu C, "The U.S. Government-sponsored Start-up and Venture Capital Models and the Reference", Forum of World Economics & Politics, 1, pp.64~69 (2007)
- Seungjoo Lee, "PUBLIC VALUE: Impacts of Government R&D Funding on R&D Performance", Public Value, 6(2), pp.1~10 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
- Fazzi L, "Social Co-operatives and Social Farming in Italy", Sociologia Ruralis, 51(2), pp.119~136 (2011)
- Zhu Z, "Toward an Integrity : A Paradigm Choice of China's Social Enterprise Certification System", Journal of East China University of Science and Technology, 4, pp.124~135 (2021)