본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

타이 경어체계에 반영된 메타포의 문화적 해석 -왕실용어에 반영된 상하향 지향은유를 중심으로

Cultural Interpretation of Metaphors in Thai Honorifics – With a Focus on Up-Down Orientational Metaphors Reflected in Royal Language

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

타이어는 경어체계가 발달한 언어이다. 특히 현재 왕실이 존재하는 타이는 복잡한 왕실용어 역시 발달해 있으며, 수직적인 상하의 개념이 경어체계에 언어적, 물리적으로 반영되어 있다. 이에 본 연구는 왕실용어 및 몸짓언어에 반영된 상하향 지향은유를 인지언어학 이론을 토대로 분석하였다. 말 언어의 경우 왕실용어 대명사를 분석한 결과, 화자의 머리나 가장 높은 곳으로 화자를 지칭하는 자기 낮춤(겸양)의 표현과 청자의 발이나 가장 낮은 곳으로 청자를 지칭하는 상대 높임의 표현을 통해 상하향 지향은유가 언어표현에 반영됨을 확인하였다. 몸짓언어 역시 왕실행사에서의 시선, 자세와 몸가짐, 경례동작 등의 종합적 분석을 통해 역시 상하향 지향은유가 물리적으로 반영됨을 확인하였다. 이러한 분석 결과는, 여러 언어에서 보편적으로 나타나는 STATUS IS HEIGHT 라는 메타포 개념이 타이의 문화와 가치관에 존재하고, 이것이 말 언어 및 몸짓언어에 유표적으로 나타남을 보여준다. 본 연구는 타이인들의 가치관과 문화에서 비롯된 메타포 개념이 언어와 행동에 미치는 영향에 대한 이해를 통해 타이 문화에 대한 깊이 있는 이해를 도모하는 동시에 이러한 말언어와 몸짓언어가 다시 메타포 개념을 형성할 수 있는 상호작용의 가능성을 생각하게 한다.

Abstract

The Thai language is a language with a highly developed honorifics system and a “Royal language,” since Thailand is a kingdom with a long monarchical history. The vertical concept of up and down is reflected in the Thai honorific system both verbally and non-verbally. This article aims to examine the orientational metaphor, which is reflected both in verbal and nonverbal Royal language. The results show that vertical orientational metaphors are reflected in pronouns in Royal language, using the “highest part of the body (of the speaker)” such as the head, hair and crown as first-person humble pronouns and using the “lowest part of the body (of the listener)” such as feet or soles as second person honorific pronouns. At the same token, vertical metaphors are also reflected physically in nonverbal communication, such as level of the eye line, posture, and salute in royal ceremonies. The result of the study implicates that the metaphorical concept of STATUS IS HEIGHT, which can be found in many languages, is also existent in Thai culture and value, and is explicitly reflected in verbal and nonverbal expressions in Thai. This research can be a meaningful attempt to deepen our understanding of Thai people and culture by comprehending the impact that the culture-driven metaphor has on language use and behavior, as well as to consider the possibility that language can affect the metaphorical concepts of the language users.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. 김용, "개념적 은유 기반의 한국어 동사 의미 교육 연구", 박사, pp.2015
  2. 노흠휘, "태국어 신체 어휘 후아(", hua, 동남아연구, pp.2019, 28(3)[DOI]
  3. 박경은, "태국 상하향 이동동사의 지향은유적 해석", 동남아연구, 23(1), pp.127~152 (2013), 동남아연구소[DOI]
  4. 박경은, "세계의 몸짓 몸짓의세계" (2016), HUINE
  5. 박경은, "태국다이어리 여유와 미소를 적다" (2016), 눌민
  6. 서은, "공간어에 나타나는 개념적 은유 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.2004
  7. 악호염, "한·중 공간 개념어 대조 연구", 석사, 국어국문학과 한국어학전공, pp.2013
  8. 와니다 크라우머, "현대 한국어와 태국어의인칭 대명사 대조 연구- 언어 유형론적 측면을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2012
  9. 윤경원, "태국어의 신체어", hua, 동남아연구, pp.2007, 17(1)[DOI]
  10. 이성하, "문법화의 이해" (2016), 한국문화사
  11. 쁘라주업 인센, "한국어와 태국어의 대우 표현에 관한 대조적 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2005
  12. 임동훈, "현대국어 경어법의 체계", 國語學, (47), pp.287~320 (2006), 국어학회
  13. 임지룡, "의미의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2008), 한국문화사
  14. 임혜원, "한국어 대화에 나타난 수직공간개념화 은유", 담화와 인지, 10(1), pp.217~239 (2003), 담화·인지언어학회
  15. 정환승, "현대태국어문법론" (2007), 삼지사
  16. 한국관광공사, "숫자로 보는 한국관광" (2018)
  17. 풍정정, "한국어 공간어 ‘위", 아래’와 중국어 ‘上, Journal of korean Culture, pp.2015, 29[DOI]
  18. 정환승, "한국어와 태국어의 방향동사 비교", 한국태국학회논총, 15(2), pp.71~99 (2009), 한국태국학회[DOI]
  19. 황문환, "1인칭 겸양어(謙讓語) '저'의 기원", 국어학, 21, pp.53~77 (1991)
  20. 吳鳳艶, "한·중 1인칭 대명사의 대조 연구", 석사, 국어국문학과, pp.2012
  21. Baker, C., "A history of Thailand" (2014), Cambridge University Press
  22. Bamroongraks, C., "Proceeding of The International Symposium on Language and Linguistics" (1988), Thammasat University Press
  23. Borneto, C. S., "The Construal of Space in Language and Thought–Cognitive Linguistics Research", pp.373~394 (1996)
  24. High and Low Thai: views from within. Pacific Linguistics. Series A, "Diller, A. V.", 51~76, pp.Occasional Papers, 67 (1983)
  25. Evans, V., "Cognitive linguistics: An introduction" (2006), Edinburgh University Press
  26. Gannon, M. J., "Understanding global cultures:Metaphorical journeys through 34 nations, clusters of nations, continents, and diversity" (2015), Sage Publications
  27. Heine, B., "문법의 인지적 기초" (2004), 박이정
  28. Yonghui Jin, "(A)comparative study of UP and DOWN in English and Chinese", 석사, 영어영문학, pp.2011
  29. Johnson, M., "The body in the mind" (1987), University of Chicago Press
  30. Lakoff, G., "Women, Fire and Dangerous Things" (1987), University of Chicago Press
  31. Lakoff, G, "Metaphors we live by" (1980), University of Chicago Press
  32. Lakoff, G, "Philosophy in the flesh" (1999), Basic books
  33. Li, X., "Conceptual metaphor theory and teaching of English and Chinese idioms", Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(3), pp.206~210 (2010)
  34. Nakamoto, K., "Is more really up?: experimental evidence for orientational metaphor", Shinrigaku kenkyu: The Japanese journal of psychology, 71(5), pp.408~414 (2000)
  35. Özçalskan, S., "Metaphorical motion in crosslinguistic perspective: A comparison of English and Turkish", Metaphor and Symbol, 18(3), pp.189~228 (2003)
  36. Park, K. E., "A Polysemy of", gada, paj, pp.in Thai: A cognitive linguistic approach, doctor[DOI]
  37. Park, M. R., "A Sociolinguistic Comparison of the Korean and Japanese Honorific Systems", Japanese, 1990, pp.1, 111~
  38. Rhee, S. H., "Semantics of Verbs and Grammaticalization: The Development in Korean from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective", Ph.D., pp.1996
  39. Taha M. M., "Is up always good and down always bad?: From linguistic to conceptual orientational metaphors in arabic", Pragmatics &Cognition, 25(2), pp.203~275 (2018)
  40. Thepkanjana, K., "Pragmatic inferencing in grammaticalization: a case study of directional verbs in Thai", Language in Use, 7, pp.176~187 (2005)
  41. Traugott, E. C., "Approaches to Grammaticalization" (1991), John Benjamins Publishing
  42. Xiu-jin, Q., "A Contrastive Study of Orientational Metaphors in English and Chinese - Taking Localizer “Up-Down”", “shang-xia” for Example, 2013, pp.(2), 24~
  43. Ning Yu, "Spatial Metaphors for Morality: A Perspective from Chinese", Metaphor and Symbol, 31(2), pp.108~125 (2016), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  44. Zarchi, M. A., "Changes in Thai Cultural and Social Values as Reflected in the use of the Royal Language in Thai Newspapers from 1932 to the Present Time", Master, pp.2001
  45. Zhai, D., "A dual mechanism of cognition and emotion in processing moral-vertical metaphors", Frontiers in psychology, 9, pp.1554~ (2018)
  46. กนกวรรณวารีเขตต์และวิภาสโพธิแพทย์, "การกลายเป็นคำไวยากรณ์ของคำนามผม.วรรณวิทัศน์", pp.196~211 (2012)
  47. ยรรยงค์สิกขะฤทธิ์, "การศึกษาเปรียบเทียบราชาศัพท์ในภาษาไทยและภาษาเขมรจากมุมมองข้ามสมัย", 박사, pp.2016
  48. วราภรณ์แสงสด, "บุรุษสรรพนามในภาษาไทย:การศึกษาเชิงประวัติ", 석사, pp.1989
  49. สุวดีนาสวัสดิ์, "ระบบการให้เกียรติที่สะท้อนจากคำขึ้นต้นคำสรรพนามบุรุษที่1และ2คําลงท้ายและคํารับในราชาศัพท์ไทย", 석사, pp.2009
  50. โสภาวรรณแสงไชย, "กริยารองขึ้นและลงในภาษาไทย", 석사, pp.1994
  51. สำนักงานเสริมสร้างเอกลักษณ์แห่งชาติสำนักนายกรัฐมนตรี, "ราชาศัพท์" (2011)
  52. สำนักเลขาธิการคณะรัฐมนตรีสำนักงานนายกรัฐมนตรี, "ข้อพึงปฏิบัติในการเข้าเฝ้าทูลละอองธุลีพระบาท", ~ (1999)
  53. "รวมเรื่องและข้อปฏิบัติราชสำนัก"[URL]
  54. "คู่มือ ป ฏิบัติง า นกระบวนการจัดบุคลากรไปร่วมงานพระราชพิธี งานรัฐพิธี งานศาสนาพิธี และง า น กิจ ก ร ร ม ต่า ง ๆ"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)