태국어 신체 어휘 의미의 은유적 확장 - “므” (‘손’) 의 다의성
A metaphorical meaning extension of a body part term in Thai - Polysemy of /mɯ:/ ('hand')
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A body part term /mɯ:/ ('hand') in Thai is a polysemous word. Its prototypical meaning consists of three attributes: one is a configurational attribute granted by virtue of its position in a body (i.e., hands are located at the end of arms); the other is a compositional attribute granted by virtue of its structural elements (i.e., hands are composed of palms and fingers); another is a functional attribute granted by virtue of its function (i.e., hands are used to grab or hold something). This prototypical meaning becomes the basis for the various metaphorical meaning extensions for the word /mɯ:/. I found that the meanings of the term /mɯ:/ extends from animate to non-animate, from corporal to spatial, from concrete to abstract, and finally from content to functional. This shows that the meanings of the term /mɯ:/ does not extend beyond the scope of the categorical metaphor theory claimed in Heine et al. When the prototypical meaning extends to abstract meanings, it is found to be done via one of the two mechanisms at large: One is a conceptual metaphor, and the other is a conceptual metonymy. Through the analysis of data collected from the Thai National Corpus, I found that the meaning of the term /mɯ:/ extends its prototypical meaning to four different conceptual metaphors, i.e. COOPERATION/ RELATION IS HOLDING IN HANDS, POSSESSION IS GETTING SOMETHING IN HAND, CONTROL IS HOLDING SOMETHING IN HAND and HELP IS GIVING A HAND. I also found that the meaning of /mɯ:/ extends to three different conceptual metonymy, i.e. HAND STANDS FOR PERSON, HAND STANDS FOR ACTIVITY and HAND STANDS FOR SKILL. These abstract meanings of /mɯ:/ are found to be derived from its prototypical meanings, thus the result of my analysis supports the theory of embodiment and conceptualization of the cognitive linguists.
Abstract
A body part term /mɯ:/ ('hand') in Thai is a polysemous word. Its prototypical meaning consists of three attributes: one is a configurational attribute granted by virtue of its position in a body (i.e., hands are located at the end of arms); the other is a compositional attribute granted by virtue of its structural elements (i.e., hands are composed of palms and fingers); another is a functional attribute granted by virtue of its function (i.e., hands are used to grab or hold something). This prototypical meaning becomes the basis for the various metaphorical meaning extensions for the word /mɯ:/. I found that the meanings of the term /mɯ:/ extends from animate to non-animate, from corporal to spatial, from concrete to abstract, and finally from content to functional. This shows that the meanings of the term /mɯ:/ does not extend beyond the scope of the categorical metaphor theory claimed in Heine et al. When the prototypical meaning extends to abstract meanings, it is found to be done via one of the two mechanisms at large: One is a conceptual metaphor, and the other is a conceptual metonymy. Through the analysis of data collected from the Thai National Corpus, I found that the meaning of the term /mɯ:/ extends its prototypical meaning to four different conceptual metaphors, i.e. COOPERATION/ RELATION IS HOLDING IN HANDS, POSSESSION IS GETTING SOMETHING IN HAND, CONTROL IS HOLDING SOMETHING IN HAND and HELP IS GIVING A HAND. I also found that the meaning of /mɯ:/ extends to three different conceptual metonymy, i.e. HAND STANDS FOR PERSON, HAND STANDS FOR ACTIVITY and HAND STANDS FOR SKILL. These abstract meanings of /mɯ:/ are found to be derived from its prototypical meanings, thus the result of my analysis supports the theory of embodiment and conceptualization of the cognitive linguists.
참고문헌 (18)
- 무로야 마사후미, "한국어와 일본어의 신체어휘 관용구 대비 연구", 석사, pp.2007
- 박종갑, "한국어와 베트남어의 다의어 대조 연구- 몇몇 신체어를 대상으로 하여", 어문학, (96), pp.51~86 (2007), 한국어문학회
- 배도용, "우리말 신체어의 의미 확장 연구", 박사, pp.2001
- 성아영, "한국어와 스페인어의 연어 대조 분석 : 신체어휘를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2010
- 이정식, "다의어 발생론" (2003), 도서출판 역락
- 임지룡, "신체화에 기초한 의미 확장의 특성 연구", 언어과학연구, (40), pp.1~31 (2007), 언어과학회
- 임지룡, "의미의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2008), 한국 문화사
- 정환승, "현대 태국어 문법론" (2007), 삼지사
- 周子又, "한·중 신체어의 다의성 대비 연구", 석사, pp.2011
- Zhuang Yu, "한국어와 중국어의 신체 관용표현에 대한 비교 연구 : '손'과 '발' 관련 표현을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2009
- Department of Linguistics, "Introduction to linguistics. Bangkok : Department of Linguistics. Faculty of Liberal Arts, Thammasat University" (2011), Department of Linguistics. Faculty of Liberal Arts, Thammasat University
- 김동환, "인지언어학 기초" (2008), 한국문화사
- Johnson, Mark, "The body in the mind" (1987), University of Chicago Press
- Lakoff, George, "Metaphors we live by" (1980), University of Chicago Press
- Lakoff, George, "몸의 철학" (2008), 도서출판 박이정
- Park, Kyung Eun, "A Polysemy of", gada, paj, pp.in thai: A cognitive linguistic approach, 박사[DOI]
- A Study of the metaphorical meaning of body par terms in Thai, In 태국어 신체 어휘의 은유적 의미 연구, "Meechareon, Uthumporn", Faculty of Liberal Arts, Thammasat University, ~ (2009)
- The Royal institute of Thailand, (2003), Nanmee books
