TA(teaching assistant) 교육 원칙과 방안－대학의 글쓰기 수업을 중심으로－
The Training Principles and Methods for Teaching Assistants －Centering on ‘reading and writing’ classes in the University－
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the exemplary class suggested in this thesis, the TA needs to provide total four times of revision and four times of student interview. Both of the procedures are for the TA to give individual feedback to the students based on the analysis and reviews of the students’ writings. The TA takes a role to provide a lesson as well as to assist the professor or lecturer in the class. He or she takes charge of two lessons during which comments are given to all the students on general tendency or problems in their writings. The TA also needs to evaluate each piece of homework and report to the professor in charge. The area a TA is in charge in a class is limited to ‘reading homework’, but within this area the TA is the principal agent to evaluate and give feedback for each student’s homework as well as to provide a lecture. The principles of TA training can be summarized into four items: First, the professors and lecturers need to share the objectives of the study with the TA’s for an efficient education. Second, the TA’s should understand the general concept of teaching methodology to achieve the objectives. Third, the TA’s should be able to set the evaluation standards clearly about the writings of students. Fourth, TA training process needs to be consistently realized as the lessons progress. Lastly, TA’s status should be maintained as the principal agent of feedback as well as a lecturer.
Abstract
In the exemplary class suggested in this thesis, the TA needs to provide total four times of revision and four times of student interview. Both of the procedures are for the TA to give individual feedback to the students based on the analysis and reviews of the students’ writings. The TA takes a role to provide a lesson as well as to assist the professor or lecturer in the class. He or she takes charge of two lessons during which comments are given to all the students on general tendency or problems in their writings. The TA also needs to evaluate each piece of homework and report to the professor in charge. The area a TA is in charge in a class is limited to ‘reading homework’, but within this area the TA is the principal agent to evaluate and give feedback for each student’s homework as well as to provide a lecture. The principles of TA training can be summarized into four items: First, the professors and lecturers need to share the objectives of the study with the TA’s for an efficient education. Second, the TA’s should understand the general concept of teaching methodology to achieve the objectives. Third, the TA’s should be able to set the evaluation standards clearly about the writings of students. Fourth, TA training process needs to be consistently realized as the lessons progress. Lastly, TA’s status should be maintained as the principal agent of feedback as well as a lecturer.
참고문헌 (27)
- 김남미, "대학 글쓰기수업에서의 동료평가 결과 연구", 한민족문화연구, (30), pp.151~180 (2009), 한민족문화학회
- 김라연, "총체적 쓰기 평가와 분석적 쓰기 평가의 상관 연구", 이중언어학, (35), pp.103~126 (2007), 이중언어학회
- 김성숙, "미국의 대학 글쓰기 교육과정과 평가", 작문연구, 6(6), pp.99~126 (2008), 한국작문학회
- 박영목, "작문 능력의 평가 방법과 절차", 국어교육, 99, pp.1~29 (1999), 한국국어교육연구회
- 朴泳穆, "協商을 통한 意味 構成과 協同 作文", 국어교육, (107), pp.6~134 (2002), 한국어교육학회
- 박영민, "반성적 쓰기를 활용한 작문 평가 방안", 새국어교육, (73), pp.33~60 (2006), 한국국어교육학회
- 박영민, "현직 국어교사와 예비 국어교사의 쓰기 평가 비교 연구", 교육과정평가연구, 12(1), pp.123~143 (2009), 한국교육과정평가원
- 석주연, "學術的 글쓰기의 評價에 대한 일고찰－大學 新入生의 論證文과 調査報告書를 중심으로－", 어문연구(語文硏究), 33(1), pp.493~520 (2005), 한국어문교육연구회
- 손용주, "교양교육과정 개편에 따른 대학교양국어와 어문정책의 방안", 한국어문연구, 9, pp.67~91 (1995), 한국어문연구학회
- 송기중, "글의 분석과 평가－대학 작문교육의 효과적 방법을 개발하기 위한 시론", 선청어문, 27(1) (1999), 서울대학교 국어교육과
- 오윤선, "이공계 대학생의 학술논문쓰기 교육과 평가항목", 국제어문, (45), pp.303~334 (2009), 국제어문학회
- 오윤호, "대학 글쓰기의 효과적인 피드백 방안", 한민족문화연구, (25), pp.139~164 (2008), 한민족문화학회
- 원진숙, "대학생들의 학술적 글쓰기 능력 신장을 위한 작문 교육 방법", 어문논집, 51, pp.55~86 (2005), 민족어문학회
- 이명실, "대학 글쓰기 교육에서 ‘평가’ 방법의 재고", 작문연구, (6), pp.67~98 (2008), 한국작문학회
- 이은자, "논술 첨삭 피드백의 문제점 - 첨삭의 내용을 중심으로", 새국어교육, (80), pp.361~382 (2008), 한국국어교육학회
- 이은자, "교사 첨삭 피드백의 원리와 방법", 작문연구, (9), pp.123~152 (2009), 한국작문학회
- 전향진, "온라인에서의 글 수정전략과 성찰저널 작성 여부가 대학생의 글 수정과 글쓰기에 미치는 효과", 사고개발, 6(2), pp.145~164 (2010), 대한사고개발학회
- 정희모, "대학 글쓰기 교육과 사고력 학습에 관한 연구", 현대문학의 연구, (25), pp.425~456 (2005), 한국문학연구학회
- 정희모, "글쓰기에서 수정(Revision)의 절차와 방법에 관한 연구 - 인지적 관점을 중심으로", 현대문학의 연구, (34), pp.333~360 (2008), 한국문학연구학회
- Bruffee, K, "The Brooklyn Plan：Attaining intellectual growth through peer group tutoring", Liberal Education, 64, pp.447~468 (1978)
- Gere, A, "Writhing Groups：History, Theory and Implication" (1987), Southern Illinois University Press
- Long, E. C, "Resources for Writers with Readings" (2007), Pearson Education, Inc
- Nystrand, M, "Response to writing as a context for learning to write, In Writing and Response：Theory, Practice and Research" (1989), National Council of Teachers of English
- Schenck, M. J, "Read, Write, Revise" (1988), St. Martin's Press
- Sharan, S, "Language and Learning in Cooprative Classroom" (1988), Springer
- Slavin, R. E, "Cooperative Learning" (1983), Longman
- Smith, P. L, "Designing Istructinal Feedback for Different Learning Outcomes, In Interactive Instruction and feedback", pp.75~104 (1993), Educational Technology