노동법상 사용자의 채용 자유와 제한 - 채용절차법을 중심으로 -
Freedom and limit of employers employment in labor law - Focusing on employment procedure law -
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Freedom of employment of the employer based on the management rights constitutional law of limitation was small. Changes in the recruitment market, was to allow employer to lead the recruitment market along with the freedom of employment. employer wants a variety of specifications and certification documents. In addition, the portfolio in order to appeal yourself to job seekers, self-introduction are also requested. Therefore burden of job seekers by the recruitment market has increased, social waste has also increased. The government protects the job seeker's rights in the recruitment market, was enacted the “recruitment procedural law” for fair recruitment procedures. However, “recruitment procedure law” has not yet been activated. this is because there is insufficient recognition of the company to “recruitment procedural law”. job seekers, subject to financial and time loss for the request and the non-return of the recruitment of the document in the recruitment process. in addition, job seekers damaged because of false recruitment advertising, or the situation that is stealing their work occurs, it has become a social problem. Therefore there is a need for full enforcement and fast activation of “recruitment procedural law”. This requires the cooperation of companies, the aggressive response of job seekers. In this paper, we consider the freedom of employment of the employer. also, take look at the main contents and the current situation. in addition explain the enacted background and purpose of the “recruitment procedural law”. and it is a core part of the a“recruitment procedural law” (ⅰ) As relevant statute of recruitment advertising , “prohibition of false recruitment advertisings, etc.”, “to prohibit the change of the contents of the recruitment advertising”, the “attribution extortion prohibition of recruitment documents.” take a look. (Ⅱ) As relevant statute of return the recruitment documents “refund claims of seekers,” “return obligation of employer,” “Delete and storage of documents”, “duty of care for the return” take a look.
Abstract
Freedom of employment of the employer based on the management rights constitutional law of limitation was small. Changes in the recruitment market, was to allow employer to lead the recruitment market along with the freedom of employment. employer wants a variety of specifications and certification documents. In addition, the portfolio in order to appeal yourself to job seekers, self-introduction are also requested. Therefore burden of job seekers by the recruitment market has increased, social waste has also increased. The government protects the job seeker's rights in the recruitment market, was enacted the “recruitment procedural law” for fair recruitment procedures. However, “recruitment procedure law” has not yet been activated. this is because there is insufficient recognition of the company to “recruitment procedural law”. job seekers, subject to financial and time loss for the request and the non-return of the recruitment of the document in the recruitment process. in addition, job seekers damaged because of false recruitment advertising, or the situation that is stealing their work occurs, it has become a social problem. Therefore there is a need for full enforcement and fast activation of “recruitment procedural law”. This requires the cooperation of companies, the aggressive response of job seekers. In this paper, we consider the freedom of employment of the employer. also, take look at the main contents and the current situation. in addition explain the enacted background and purpose of the “recruitment procedural law”. and it is a core part of the a“recruitment procedural law” (ⅰ) As relevant statute of recruitment advertising , “prohibition of false recruitment advertisings, etc.”, “to prohibit the change of the contents of the recruitment advertising”, the “attribution extortion prohibition of recruitment documents.” take a look. (Ⅱ) As relevant statute of return the recruitment documents “refund claims of seekers,” “return obligation of employer,” “Delete and storage of documents”, “duty of care for the return” take a look.
참고문헌 (21)
- 고용노동부, "채용절차 공정화에 관한 법률 업무 매뉴얼", ~ (2015)
- 고인석, "구직서류 반환 등 채용절차의 공정화에 관한 법률안 제정안에 대한 공청회 관련 의견문", 「구직서류 반환 등 채용절차의 공정화에 관한 법률안」에 관한 공청회 자료집 (2013), 국회환경노동위원회
- 김형배, "노동법" (2015), 박영사
- 김형배, "노동법강의" (2015), 신조사
- 나달숙, "종립대학에서의 교직원채용의 자유와 제한 : 대학의 자율성을 중심으로", 교육법학연구, 21(2), pp.65~88 (2009), 대한교육법학회[DOI]
- 노길준, "「구직서류 반환 등 채용절차의 공정화에 관한 법률안」에 대한 검토", 「구직서류 반환 등 채용절차의 공정화에 관한 법률안」에 관한 공청회 자료집 (2013), 국회환경노동위원회
- 근로자 균등대우 실현을 위한 노동법적 과제, "문무기", 한국노동연구원, ~ (2007)
- 박종갑, "구직서류 반환 등 채용절차의 공정화에 관한 법률안에 대한 경제계 의견", 「구직서류 반환 등 채용절차의 공정화에 관한 법률안」에 관한 공청회 자료집 (2013), 국회환경노동위원회
- 송강직, "노동법학에서의 헌법학의 역할", 동아법학, (48), pp.807~856 (2010), 법학연구소
- 이민희, "최근 기업 주도의 채용 관행 및 구직자의 입사전형 패턴 분석", 「구직서류 반환 등 채용절차의 공정화에 관한 법률안」에 관한 공청회 자료집 (2013), 국회환경노동위원회
- 이승길, "채용절차법과 사용자의 채용의 자유와 한계", 노사저널 (2015)
- 기업환경 개선 종합연구, "이주선", 한국경제연구원, ~ (2008)
- 임종률, "노동법" (2015), 박영사
- 장애인 의무고용제도의 실효성 및 효과적 운영방안, "전광석", 고용노동부, ~ (2010)
- 각종 의무고용제도 개선방안 연구, "조선일", 국무조정실, ~ (2005)
- 조용만, "장애인차별금지 법제와 의무고용제도의 관계 정립", 장애인차별금지 법제와 의무고용제도의 관계 정립 정책토론회 (2007)
- 하갑래, "근로기준법" (2014), 중앙경제
- 행정안전부, "개인정보보호 가이드라인-인사․노무분야", ~ (2012)
- 구직서류 반환 등 채용절차 공정화에 관한 법률안 검토보고서, "환경노동위원회 전문위원", 환경노동위원회, ~ (2013)
- 구직서류 반환 등 채용절차 공정화에 관한 법률안 심사보고서, "환경노동위원회", 환경노동위원회, ~ (2014)
- 菅野和夫, "일본노동법" (2015), 법문사
