비정규직 보호법의 문제점과 해결 관점
The Problem of Protecting Non-Regular Workers Law and the Standpoint of Solution
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Since it is passed legislation Protecting the interests of non-regular workers in this October, a laid-off worker ccurred first because of the Protecting non-regular workers law. The purpose of this law is the same treatment of non-regular workers and regulars on the conditions of work and transformation of non-regular workers to the regular workers if non-regular workers is still employed for more 2 years. On the contrary employers dismiss the non -regular workers to avoid the legislation Protecting the interests of non-regular workers. so mass unemployment occurs by this law. For the Protecting non-regular workers law will be used as the initial purpose, it is important to grasp for non-regular workers' actual condition of companies and problem of this law clearly. Moreover we need to view the protecting policies for non-regular workers on the base of the principle of public interests first. But we also need to consider about a realistic understanding on internal market economy and the constitutional limitation of social market economic principle to intervene between workers and companies. This article focuses on exposed issues of the Protecting non-regular workers law and suggests solutions on the problems of the it in the concrete by the viewpoint based on the contemporary situations.
Abstract
Since it is passed legislation Protecting the interests of non-regular workers in this October, a laid-off worker ccurred first because of the Protecting non-regular workers law. The purpose of this law is the same treatment of non-regular workers and regulars on the conditions of work and transformation of non-regular workers to the regular workers if non-regular workers is still employed for more 2 years. On the contrary employers dismiss the non -regular workers to avoid the legislation Protecting the interests of non-regular workers. so mass unemployment occurs by this law. For the Protecting non-regular workers law will be used as the initial purpose, it is important to grasp for non-regular workers' actual condition of companies and problem of this law clearly. Moreover we need to view the protecting policies for non-regular workers on the base of the principle of public interests first. But we also need to consider about a realistic understanding on internal market economy and the constitutional limitation of social market economic principle to intervene between workers and companies. This article focuses on exposed issues of the Protecting non-regular workers law and suggests solutions on the problems of the it in the concrete by the viewpoint based on the contemporary situations.
참고문헌 (27)
- 계희열, "헌법학(상)" (1995), 박영사
- 권오승, "경제법" (1999), 법문사
- 김형배, "노동법" (2007), 박영사
- 박종홍, "변증법적 논리" (1977), 박영사
- 이상국, "근로기준법" (2006), 신론사
- 임석진, "헤겔의 노동의 개념" (1990), 지식산업사
- 전광석, "한국헌법론" (2006), 법문사
- 최종고, "법철학" (2002), 박영사
- 최종태, "상생 노사관계와 공정보상시스템" (2005), 서울대학교출판부
- 허영, "한국헌법론" (2001), 박영사
- 홍성방, "헌법학" (2002), 현암사
- 베르너 마이호퍼, "법치국가와 인간의 존엄" (1994), 삼영사
- J. 롤스, "사회정의론" (1985), 서광사
- 권두섭, "비정규직 차별시정 제도의 문제점 in: 월간 노동법률" (2007), 중앙경제사
- 김도균, "법원리로서의 공익", 법에 있어서의 공익(청담 최송화교수정년기념학술회의자료집 (2006), 서울대 학교법학연구소
- 노동부, "불법파견형태의 사내하도급 문제 해결을 위한 참여정부의 노력과 과제" (2007)
- 박균성, "프랑스 행정법상 공익개념", 법에 있어서의 공익(청담 최송화교수 정년 기념학술회의) (2006), 서울대법학연구소
- 박종희, "근로기준법상의 근로자개념", 노동법학제, (16) (2003), 한국노동법학회
- "사람입국 ? 일자리 위원회, 「비정규직 실태 및 정책과제(제73회국정과제회의 보고서)」, 2006", ~ (2006)
- 이달휴, "사회법관점에서의 양극화해소와 로스쿨", 노동법논총, 통권 : 9 (2006), 한국비교노동법학회
- 이달휴, "헌법상의 사회보장법의 이념", 헌법학연구, 6(2) (2000), 한국헌법학회
- 이원우, "경제규재와 공익", 법에 있어서의 공익(청담 최송화교수정년기념학술회의자료집) (2006), 서울대학교법학연구소
- 이진규, "경영 및 HR관점에서의 비정규직차별문제 해법 in: 월간 노동법률" (2007), 중앙경제사
- 유정엽, "노동계가 본 비정규직문제 해결과제 in: 월간 노동법률" (2007), 중앙경제사
- 장경수, "위장도급과 직접적 고용관계 인정의 기준 in: 월간 노동법률" (2007), 중앙경제사
- 西谷敏, "勞動者の槪念 in: Jurist 增刊 勞動法の爭點" (2004), 有斐閣
- 梅田, "CSR槪論", 季刊 勞動法, (208) (2005), 勞動開發硏究會
