사용자의 시말서 제출명령에 대한 법적 판단
A Legal Study on the Asking for Giving a Written Explanation or Apology
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the legal effects to the Employer's Asking for Giving a Written Explanation or Apology. Employer's Asking for Giving a Written Explanation or Apology with the disciplinary actions or directions is able to infringe on the Employee's Constitutional basic rights. Especially, it is necessary that Employer's Asking for Giving a Written Explanation or Apology is restricted in connection with the dignity of man and the right to pursue one's happiness(Article 10, Constitution), the freedom of conscience(Article 19, Constitution), three labor rights(Article 33, Constitution). It can but to judge in comparison with Employer's vocational necessity and Employee's personal treatment whether the Employer abuses his right or not. If the disadvantage to infringe on Employee's personal right would be worse than the one to infringe on Employer's vocational necessity, Employer's Asking for Giving a Written Explanation or Apology could not be binding because of abusing his right or antisocial action.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the legal effects to the Employer's Asking for Giving a Written Explanation or Apology. Employer's Asking for Giving a Written Explanation or Apology with the disciplinary actions or directions is able to infringe on the Employee's Constitutional basic rights. Especially, it is necessary that Employer's Asking for Giving a Written Explanation or Apology is restricted in connection with the dignity of man and the right to pursue one's happiness(Article 10, Constitution), the freedom of conscience(Article 19, Constitution), three labor rights(Article 33, Constitution). It can but to judge in comparison with Employer's vocational necessity and Employee's personal treatment whether the Employer abuses his right or not. If the disadvantage to infringe on Employee's personal right would be worse than the one to infringe on Employer's vocational necessity, Employer's Asking for Giving a Written Explanation or Apology could not be binding because of abusing his right or antisocial action.
참고문헌 (24)
- 계희열, "헌법상 인간의 존엄과 가치", 법학논집, 32 (1996), 고려대법학연구소
- 권영성, "헌법학원론(개정판)" (2006), 법문사
- 김유성, "노동법Ⅱ" (1997), 법문사
- 김태정, "근로자의 사생활의 비밀·자유에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2004
- 김형배, "노동법(신판제4판)" (2007), 박영사
- 박지순, "징계제도의 법적 구조 및 개별 쟁점의 재검토", 노동법포럼, 1(1) (2008), 노동법이론실무학회
- 방승주, "사법질서에 있어서 기본권의 효력:독일의 이론과 판례를 중심으로 in:법과 인간의 존엄", 청암정경식박사화갑기념논문집 (1997)
- 방준식, "사용자 지시권에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2006
- 성낙인, "헌법학(제6판)," (2006), 법문사
- 하경효, "근로관계에 있어서 근로자의 양심의 자유와 자기책임 in:노동법에 있어서 권리와 책임", 김형배교수화갑기념논문집 (1994)
- 菅野和夫, "勞働法" (2005)
- 菅野耕毅, "信義則および權利濫用の硏究" (1994), 信山社
- 山田省三, "職場における勞働者プライヴァシ-保護", 日本勞働法學會誌, (78) (1991), ,
- 山本敬三, "公序良俗論の再構成" (1999), 有斐閣
- 山本圭子, "始末書提出をめぐる判例動向と法律問題", 季刊勞働法, (165) (1993)
- 土田道夫, "上司の指導監督權に基づく始末書の作成要求等の違法性" (1991), 平成2年度重要判例解說
- 福島, "勞働法における信義則", 社會法の現代的課題 (1983), 林迪廣先生還曆記念論文集
- 唐津, "始末書提出拒否" (1979), 勞働判例百選
- 小西國友, "懲戒處分と非懲戒處分の限界および相互の關係", 季刊勞働法, (160) (1991), ,
- Böker, "Das Weisungsrecht des Arbeitgeber", ~ (1971)
- E. Wolf, "Das Arbeitsverhältnis - Personenrechtliches Gemeinschaftsverhältnis oder Schuldverhältnis?", ~ (1970)
- Hausele, "Weisung und Gewissen im Arbeitsrecht", ~ (1989)
- Kruger, "Die Verfassungen in der Zivilrechtsprechung", ~ (1949)
- Wiedemann, "Das Arbeitsverhältnis als Austausch- und Gemeinschafts- verhältnis", ~ (1966)