Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Tantalum Augment in Patients with Paprosky III or IV Acetabular Bone Defects: A Minimum 2-year Follow Up Study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to report the short-term outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using tantalum augments in patients with severe acetabular bone defects. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 15 revision THAs performed in 15 patients using tantalum augments between June 2010 and December 2013. Acetabular bone defects were Paprosky type IIIA in 7 hips, type IIIB in 7, and type IV in 1. The causes of revision surgery were aseptic loosening in 12 hips and deep infection in 3. Revisions were first in 1 hip, second in 3, and third in 11. Six patients were male and 9 female with a mean age of 59 years (range, 48-75 years). Mean follow-up was 29 months (range, 24-48 months). Results: Mean Harris hip score was improved from 34 points (range, 12-54 points) preoperatively to 84 points (range, 38-90 points) at final follow-up. On the final follow-up radiographs, there were 12 hips (80.0%) with stable fixation of the acetabular cup, 2 (13.3%) with secondary stability after mild acetabular protrusion, and 1 (6.7%) with radiolucency around the acetabular cup without mechanical symptoms. Complications included one patient with acute hematogenous infection managed by surgical debridement and long-term antibiotic therapy. There were no cases with nerve palsy or dislocation during the follow-up period. Conclusion: The present study showed satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision THA using tantalum augments due to severe acetabular bone defects of Paprosky type III or IV at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to report the short-term outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using tantalum augments in patients with severe acetabular bone defects. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 15 revision THAs performed in 15 patients using tantalum augments between June 2010 and December 2013. Acetabular bone defects were Paprosky type IIIA in 7 hips, type IIIB in 7, and type IV in 1. The causes of revision surgery were aseptic loosening in 12 hips and deep infection in 3. Revisions were first in 1 hip, second in 3, and third in 11. Six patients were male and 9 female with a mean age of 59 years (range, 48-75 years). Mean follow-up was 29 months (range, 24-48 months). Results: Mean Harris hip score was improved from 34 points (range, 12-54 points) preoperatively to 84 points (range, 38-90 points) at final follow-up. On the final follow-up radiographs, there were 12 hips (80.0%) with stable fixation of the acetabular cup, 2 (13.3%) with secondary stability after mild acetabular protrusion, and 1 (6.7%) with radiolucency around the acetabular cup without mechanical symptoms. Complications included one patient with acute hematogenous infection managed by surgical debridement and long-term antibiotic therapy. There were no cases with nerve palsy or dislocation during the follow-up period. Conclusion: The present study showed satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision THA using tantalum augments due to severe acetabular bone defects of Paprosky type III or IV at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.
참고문헌 (14)
- Bozic KJ, "The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 91, pp.128~133 (2009)
- Paprosky WG, "Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation", J Arthroplasty, 9, pp.33~44 (1994)
- Long WJ, "Uncemented porous tantalum acetabular components : Early follow-up and failures in 599 revision total hip arthroplasties", Iowa Orthop J, 35, pp.108~113 (2015)
- Elganzoury I, "Early results of trabecular metal augment for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty", Acta Orthop Belg, 79, pp.530~535 (2013)
- Gehrke T, "Acetabular revision in THA using tantalum augments combined with impaction bone grafting", Hip Int, 23, pp.359~365 (2013)
- Harris WH., "Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 51, pp.737~755 (1969)
- DeLee JG, "Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 121, pp.20~32 (1976)
- Lim SJ, "Medium-term results of cementation of a highly cross-linked polyethylene liner into a well-fixed acetabular shell in revision hip arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 29, pp.634~637 (2014)
- Shi HF, "Radiographic analysis of the restoration of hip joint center following open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures : a retrospective cohort study", BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 15, pp.277~ (2014)
- Kurtz S, "Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 89, pp.780~785 (2007)
- Haynes JA, "Contemporary surgical indications and referral trends in revision total hip arthroplasty : A 10-year review", J Arthroplasty, 31, pp.622~625 (2016)
- Grappiolo G, "Trabecular metal augments for the management of Paprosky type III defects without pelvic discontinuity", J Arthroplasty, 30, pp.1024~1029 (2015)
- Tokarski AT, "Is tantalum protective against infection in revision total hip arthroplasty?", Bone Joint J, 97-B, pp.45~49 (2015)
- Del Gaizo DJ, "Tantalum augments for paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm followup", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 470, pp.395~401 (2012)