The Dome Technique for Managing Massive Anterosuperior Medial Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Short-Term Outcomes
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The dome technique is a technique used in performance of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) involving intraoperative joining of two porous metal acetabular augments to fill a massive anterosuperior medial acetabular bone defect. While excellent outcomes were achieved using this surgical technique in a series of three cases, short-term results have not been reported. We hypothesized that excellent short-term clinical and patient reported outcomes could be achieved with use of the dome technique. Materials and Methods: A multicenter case series was conducted for evaluation of patients who underwent revision THA using the dome technique for management of Paprosky 3B anterosuperior medial acetabular bone loss from 2013-2019 with a minimum clinical follow-up period of two years. Twelve cases in 12 patients were identified. Baseline demographics, intraoperative variables, surgical outcomes, and patient reported outcomes were acquired. Results: The implant survivorship was 91% with component failure requiring re-revision in only one patient at a mean follow-up period of 36.2 months (range, 24-72 months). Three patients (25.0%) experienced complications, including re-revision for component failure, inter-prosthetic dual-mobility dissociation, and periprosthetic joint infection. Of seven patients who completed the HOOS, JR (hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score, joint replacement) survey, five patients showed improvement. Conclusion: Excellent outcomes can be achieved using the dome technique for management of massive anterosuperior medial acetabular defects in revision THA with survivorship of 91% at a mean follow-up period of three years. Conduct of future studies will be required in order to evaluate mid- to long-term outcomes for this technique.
Abstract
Purpose: The dome technique is a technique used in performance of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) involving intraoperative joining of two porous metal acetabular augments to fill a massive anterosuperior medial acetabular bone defect. While excellent outcomes were achieved using this surgical technique in a series of three cases, short-term results have not been reported. We hypothesized that excellent short-term clinical and patient reported outcomes could be achieved with use of the dome technique. Materials and Methods: A multicenter case series was conducted for evaluation of patients who underwent revision THA using the dome technique for management of Paprosky 3B anterosuperior medial acetabular bone loss from 2013-2019 with a minimum clinical follow-up period of two years. Twelve cases in 12 patients were identified. Baseline demographics, intraoperative variables, surgical outcomes, and patient reported outcomes were acquired. Results: The implant survivorship was 91% with component failure requiring re-revision in only one patient at a mean follow-up period of 36.2 months (range, 24-72 months). Three patients (25.0%) experienced complications, including re-revision for component failure, inter-prosthetic dual-mobility dissociation, and periprosthetic joint infection. Of seven patients who completed the HOOS, JR (hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score, joint replacement) survey, five patients showed improvement. Conclusion: Excellent outcomes can be achieved using the dome technique for management of massive anterosuperior medial acetabular defects in revision THA with survivorship of 91% at a mean follow-up period of three years. Conduct of future studies will be required in order to evaluate mid- to long-term outcomes for this technique.
참고문헌 (27)
- Andrew M. Schwartz, "Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030", The Journal of Arthroplasty, 35(6), pp.S79~S85 (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Wayne G. Paprosky, "Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty", The Journal of Arthroplasty, 9(1), pp.33~44 (1994), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- K. Lingaraj, "The management of severe acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using modular porous metal components", The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 91-B(12), pp.1555~1560 (2009), British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery[DOI]
- Carl C. Berasi, "Are Custom Triflange Acetabular Components Effective for Reconstruction of Catastrophic Bone Loss?", Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 473(2), pp.528~535 (2015), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- Henri Migaud, "Acetabular reconstruction using porous metallic material in complex revision total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review", Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 105(1), pp.S53~S61 (2019), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- N. P. Sheth, "Acetabular distraction: an alternative for severe acetabular bone loss and chronic pelvic discontinuity", The Bone & Joint Journal, 96-B(11_Supple_A), pp.36~42 (2014), British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery[DOI]
- Sufian S. Ahmad, "Follow-up definitions in clinical orthopaedic research", Bone & Joint Open, 2(5), pp.344~350 (2021), British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery[DOI]
- David K. DeBoer, "Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Pelvic Discontinuity", The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 89(4), pp.835~840 (2007), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- Atul B. Joshi, "Results for a custom acetabular component for acetabular deficiency", The Journal of Arthroplasty, 17(5), pp.643~648 (2002), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Michael J. Taunton, "Pelvic Discontinuity Treated With Custom Triflange Component: A Reliable Option", Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 470(2), pp.428~434 (2012), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- Shane P. Russell, "Trabecular Metal Augments for Severe Acetabular Defects in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Follow-Up", The Journal of Arthroplasty, 36(5), pp.1740~1745 (2021), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Andrej Moličnik, "Porous tantalum shells and augments for acetabular cup revisions", European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 24(6), pp.911~917 (2013), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- R. Michael Meneghini, "Mechanical Stability of Novel Highly Porous Metal Acetabular Components in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty", The Journal of Arthroplasty, 25(3), pp.337~341 (2010), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- M. Abolghasemian, "Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss", The Bone & Joint Journal, 95-B(2), pp.166~172 (2013), British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery[DOI]
- G. P. Goodman, "The custom triflange cup: build it and they will come", The Bone & Joint Journal, 98-B(1_Supple_A), pp.68~72 (2016), British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery[DOI]
- Christopher M. Melnic, "The Dome Technique, an Option for Massive Anterosuperior Medial Acetabular Bone Loss: A Retrospective Case Series", HSS Journal ®, 16(S2), pp.521~526 (2019), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Milan S Moore, "Radiographic Signs of Osseointegration in Porous-coated Acetabular Components", Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 444, pp.176~183 (2006), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- M. Baauw, "The accuracy of positioning of a custom-made implant within a large acetabular defect at revision arthroplasty of the hip", The Bone & Joint Journal, 97-B(6), pp.780~785 (2015), British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery[DOI]
- Sameer Jain, "Options for Managing Severe Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty. a Systematic Review", HIP International, 24(2), pp.109~122 (2013), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Markus Rossmann, "An alternative treatment option for Paprosky Type IIIb acetabular defect using multiple tantalum wedges – A case report", Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 11(1), pp.70~72 (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- C. H. Ansorge, "Acetabular Reconstruction Using Multiple Porous Tantalum Augments: Three-Quarter Football Augment", Case Reports in Orthopedics, 2022, pp.1~5 (2022), Hindawi Limited[DOI]
- Marieke Baauw, "Current Construct Options for Revision of Large Acetabular Defects", JBJS Reviews, 4(11) (2016), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- Eduardo Garcia-Cimbrelo, "The Survival and Fate of Acetabular Reconstruction With Impaction Grafting for Large Defects", Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 468(12), pp.3304~3313 (2010), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- Steven H. Weeden, "The Use of Tantalum Porous Metal Implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B Defects", The Journal of Arthroplasty, 22(6), pp.151~155 (2007), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Xavier Flecher, "Management of Severe Bone Loss in Acetabular Revision Using a Trabecular Metal Shell", The Journal of Arthroplasty, 23(7), pp.949~955 (2008), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- E. Winter, "Allogeneic Cancellous Bone Graft and a Burch-Schneider Ring for Acetabular Reconstruction in Revision Hip Arthroplasty", The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 83(6), pp.862~867 (2001), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- Trevor R. Grace, "Dual Mobility Reduces Dislocations—Why I Use It in All Revisions", The Journal of Arthroplasty, 36(7), pp.S63~S69 (2021), Elsevier BV[DOI]