본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Acetabular Defect Reconstruction with Trabecular Metal Augments: Study with Minimum One-year Follow-up

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: High rates of mechanical failure have been reported in type III acetabular defects. Recently porous trabecular metal augments have been introduced with, excellent biomechanical characteristics and biocompatibility, allowing early stability and greater bone ingrowth. The aim of the study was to assess the short term clinical and radiological outcome of the trabecular metal augments. Materials and Methods: We performed, 22 revision total hip arthroplasties (THA) and 6 primary THA (total 28) using trabecular metal augments to reconstruct acetabular defect between 2011 to 2015. Among 28 patients, 18 were males, 10 females. Mean age of patients was 61.21 years. Paprosky classification for acetabular bone defects was used. Eighteen cases were classified as grade 3 A and 10 cases as grade 3B. Hip center was calculated in each case preoperatively and compared postoperatively to check whether it has been brought down. Clinical outcome assessed using Harris hip score (HHS) and radiological outcomes as osteolysis in acetabular zones and osseointegration, according to Moore’s criteria. Results: HHS improved from 58.00 to 86.20. Centre of rotation of hip joint corrected from 38.90 mm preoperatively to 23.85 mm postoperatively above the interteardrop line. Among 28 patients, 18 patients had three or more signs of osseointegration (Moore’s criteria), during final follow up and 10 had one/two signs. No radiolucency, osteolysis, or loosening found during follow up radiographic examination. Conclusion: Our study showed that trabecular metal augments were highly satisfactory in short term. However, long term study is required for better evaluation.

Abstract

Purpose: High rates of mechanical failure have been reported in type III acetabular defects. Recently porous trabecular metal augments have been introduced with, excellent biomechanical characteristics and biocompatibility, allowing early stability and greater bone ingrowth. The aim of the study was to assess the short term clinical and radiological outcome of the trabecular metal augments. Materials and Methods: We performed, 22 revision total hip arthroplasties (THA) and 6 primary THA (total 28) using trabecular metal augments to reconstruct acetabular defect between 2011 to 2015. Among 28 patients, 18 were males, 10 females. Mean age of patients was 61.21 years. Paprosky classification for acetabular bone defects was used. Eighteen cases were classified as grade 3 A and 10 cases as grade 3B. Hip center was calculated in each case preoperatively and compared postoperatively to check whether it has been brought down. Clinical outcome assessed using Harris hip score (HHS) and radiological outcomes as osteolysis in acetabular zones and osseointegration, according to Moore’s criteria. Results: HHS improved from 58.00 to 86.20. Centre of rotation of hip joint corrected from 38.90 mm preoperatively to 23.85 mm postoperatively above the interteardrop line. Among 28 patients, 18 patients had three or more signs of osseointegration (Moore’s criteria), during final follow up and 10 had one/two signs. No radiolucency, osteolysis, or loosening found during follow up radiographic examination. Conclusion: Our study showed that trabecular metal augments were highly satisfactory in short term. However, long term study is required for better evaluation.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Necas L, "Survival analysis of total hip and knee replacement in Slovakia 2003-2011", Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 80(Suppl), pp.1~85 (2013)
  2. Templeton JE, "Revision of a cemented acetabular component to a cementless acetabular component. A ten to fourteenyear follow-up study", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 83-A, pp.1706~1711 (2001)
  3. Jain S, "Options for managing severe acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty. A systematic review", Hip Int, 24, pp.109~122 (2014)
  4. Gill TJ, "The Bürch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty: indications, principles and long-term results", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80, pp.946~953 (1998)
  5. Herrera A, "Management of types III and IV acetabular deficiencies with the longitudinal oblong revision cup", J Arthroplasty, 21, pp.857~864 (2006)
  6. Bobyn JD, "Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 81, pp.907~914 (1999)
  7. Paprosky WG, "Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation", J Arthroplasty, 9, pp.33~44 (1994)
  8. Engh CA, "Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (257), pp.107~128 (1990)
  9. Moore MS, "Radiographic signs of osseointegration in porous-coated acetabular components", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 444, pp.176~183 (2006)
  10. Whitehouse MR, "Continued good results with modular trabecular metal augments for acetabular defects in hip arthroplasty at 7 to 11 years", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 473, pp.521~527 (2015)
  11. Antoniades J, "Cross-sectional anatomy of the ilium: implications for acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 470, pp.3537~3541 (2012)
  12. Della Valle CJ, "Cementless acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (420), pp.96~100 (2004)
  13. Whaley AL, "Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 83-A, pp.1252~1257 (2001)
  14. D’Antonio JA, "Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (243), pp.126~137 (1989)
  15. Berry DJ, "The adult hip", pp.1371~1381 (2007), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
  16. van Haaren EH, "High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 89, pp.296~300 (2007)
  17. Benazzo F, "Trabecular titanium can induce in vitro osteogenic differentiation of human adipose derived stem cells without osteogenic factors", J Biomed Mater Res A, 102, pp.2061~2071 (2014)
  18. Marin E, "Characterization of cellular solids in Ti6Al4V for orthopaedic implant applications: Trabecular titanium", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 3, pp.373~381 (2010)
  19. Van Kleunen JP, "Acetabular revisions using trabecular metal cups and augments", J Arthroplasty, 24(6 Suppl), pp.64~68 (2009)
  20. Del Gaizo DJ, "Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm followup", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 470, pp.395~401 (2012)
  21. Weeden SH, "The use of tantalum porous metal implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B defects", J Arthroplasty, 22(6 Suppl 2), pp.151~155 (2007)
  22. Gustke KA, "Use of jumbo cups for revision of acetabulae with large bony defects", J Arthroplasty, 29, pp.199~203 (2014)
  23. Patel JV, "The fate of cementless jumbo cups in revision hip arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 18, pp.129~133 (2003)
  24. Schreurs BW, "Acetabular revision with impacted morselized cancellous bone graft and a cemented cup in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A concise follow-up, at eight to nineteen years, of a previous report", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 91, pp.646~651 (2009)
  25. Nehme A, "Modular porous metal augments for treatment of severe acetabular bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (429), pp.201~208 (2004)
  26. Unger AS, "Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results of 60 hips", J Arthroplasty, 20, pp.1002~1009 (2005)
  27. Abolghasemian M, "Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss: a mid-term review", Bone Joint J, 95-B, pp.166~172 (2013)
  28. Banerjee S, "Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals", Int Orthop, 38, pp.689~702 (2014)
  29. DeLee JG, "Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 121, pp.20~32 (1976)
  30. Röder C, "The validity of clinical examination in the diagnosis of loosening of components in total hip arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 85, pp.37~44 (2003)
  31. Sporer SM, "The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects", J Arthroplasty, 21(6 Suppl 2), pp.83~86 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)