Acetabular Reconstruction in Total Hip Arthroplasty
3
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The difficulties encountered in dealing with the bone deficient acetabulum are amongst the greatest challenges in hip surgery. Acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty can successfully be achieved with hemispherical components featuring a porous or roughened ingrowth surface and options for placement of multiple screws for minor acetabular defect. Acetabular component selection is mostly based on the amount of bone loss present. In the presence of combined cavitary and segmental defects without superior acetabular coverage, reconstructions with a structural acetabular allograft protected by a cage or a custom-made triflange cage have been one of preferred surgical options. The use of a cage or ring over structural allograft bone for massive uncontained defects in acetabular revision can restore host bone stock and facilitate subsequent rerevision surgery to a certain extent. But high complication rates have been reported including aseptic loosening, infection, dislocation and metal failure. On the other hand, recent literature is reporting satisfactory outcomes with the use of modular augments combined with a hemispherical shell for major acetabular defect. Highly porous metals have been introduced for clinical use in arthroplasty surgery over the last decade. Their higher porosity and surface friction are ideal for acetabular revision, optimizing biological fixation. The use of trabecular metal cups in acetabular revision has yielded excellent clinical results. This article summarizes author’s experience regarding revision acetabular reconstruction options following failed hip surgery including arthroplasty.
Abstract
The difficulties encountered in dealing with the bone deficient acetabulum are amongst the greatest challenges in hip surgery. Acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty can successfully be achieved with hemispherical components featuring a porous or roughened ingrowth surface and options for placement of multiple screws for minor acetabular defect. Acetabular component selection is mostly based on the amount of bone loss present. In the presence of combined cavitary and segmental defects without superior acetabular coverage, reconstructions with a structural acetabular allograft protected by a cage or a custom-made triflange cage have been one of preferred surgical options. The use of a cage or ring over structural allograft bone for massive uncontained defects in acetabular revision can restore host bone stock and facilitate subsequent rerevision surgery to a certain extent. But high complication rates have been reported including aseptic loosening, infection, dislocation and metal failure. On the other hand, recent literature is reporting satisfactory outcomes with the use of modular augments combined with a hemispherical shell for major acetabular defect. Highly porous metals have been introduced for clinical use in arthroplasty surgery over the last decade. Their higher porosity and surface friction are ideal for acetabular revision, optimizing biological fixation. The use of trabecular metal cups in acetabular revision has yielded excellent clinical results. This article summarizes author’s experience regarding revision acetabular reconstruction options following failed hip surgery including arthroplasty.
참고문헌 (44)
- Slooff TJ, "Cemented fixation with bone grafts", Orthop Clin North Am, 24, pp.667~677 (1993)
- van Egmond N, "Revisions of extensive acetabular defects with impaction grafting and a cement cup", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 469, pp.562~573 (2011)
- van Haaren EH, "High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 89, pp.296~300 (2007)
- Bostrom MP, "Acetabular revision with the Contour antiprotrusio cage : 2-to 5-year followup", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 453, pp.188~194 (2006)
- Issack PS, "Acetabular component revision in total hip arthroplasty. Part II: management of major bone loss and pelvic discontinuity", Am J Orthop(Belle Mead NJ), 38, pp.550~556 (2009)
- Sporer SM., "How to do a revision total hip arthroplasty: revision of the acetabulum", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 93, pp.1359~1366 (2011)
- Borland WS, "Use of porous trabecular metal augments with impaction bone grafting in management of acetabular bone loss", Acta Orthop, 83, pp.347~352 (2012)
- Abolghasemian M, "Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss: a mid-term review", Bone Joint J, 95-B, pp.166~172 (2013)
- Yun HH, "Relationship between the pelvic osteolytic volume on computed tomography and clinical outcome in patients with cementless acetabular components", Int Orthop, 35, pp.1453~1459 (2011)
- Suh DH, "Characterization of progression of pelvic osteolysis after cementless total hip arthroplasty : computed tomographic study", J Arthroplasty, 28, pp.1851~1855 (2013)
- Reiley MA, "Vascular complications following total hip arthroplasty. A review of the literature and a report of two cases", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (186), pp.23~28 (1984)
- Patel S, "Initial implant stability predicts migration but not failure in cementless acetabular revision with bone grafting", J Arthroplasty, 28, pp.832~837 (2013)
- Mazhar Tokgözog˘lu A, "Scintigraphic evaluation of impaction grafting for total hip arthroplasty revision", Orthop Trauma Surg, 120, pp.416~419 (2000)
- Goldberg VM, "Selection of bone grafts for revision total hip arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (381), pp.68~76 (2000)
- Stevenson S, "Biology of bone grafts", Orthop Clin North Am, 30, pp.543~552 (1999)
- Schimmel JW, "Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morselized cancellous allografts in cemented hip arthroplasty : a histological and biomechanical study on the goat", J Arthroplasty, 13, pp.438~448 (1998)
- Etienne G, "Use of cancellous bone chips and demineralized bone matrix in the treatment of acetabular osteolysis: preliminary 2-year follow-up", Orthopedics, 27(1 Suppl), pp.123~126 (2004)
- Jasty M, "Total hip reconstruction using frozen femoral head allografts in patients with acetabular bone loss", Orthop Clin North Am, 18, pp.291~299 (1987)
- Avci S, "2-to 10-year follow-up study of acetabular revisions using allograft bone to repair bone defects", J Arthroplasty, 13, pp.61~69 (1998)
- Buttaro MA, "Acetabular revision with metal mesh, impaction bone grafting, and a cemented cup", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466, pp.2482~2490 (2008)
- Brubaker SM, "Treatment options and allograft use in revision total hip arthroplasty the acetabulum", J Arthroplasty, 22(7 Suppl 3), pp.52~56 (2007)
- Murphy SB, "Management of acetabular bone stock deficiency", J Arthroplasty, 20(4 Suppl 2), pp.85~90 (2005)
- Paprosky WG, "Principles of bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular technique", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (298), pp.147~155 (1994)
- Sporer SM, "The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Average ten-year follow-up", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87, pp.760~765 (2005)
- O’Rourke MR, "Use of structural allografts in acetabular revision surgery", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 420, pp.113~121 (2004)
- Pollock FH, "The fate of massive allografts in total hip acetabular revision surgery", J Arthroplasty, 7, pp.271~276 (1992)
- Garbuz D, "Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft. Study with a minimum five-year follow-up", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 78, pp.693~697 (1996)
- Gross AE, "Restoration of acetabular bone loss 2005", J Arthroplasty, 21(4 Suppl 1), pp.117~120 (2006)
- Gross AE, "The current role of structural grafts and cages in revision arthroplasty of the hip", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 429, pp.193~200 (2004)
- Oakes DA, "Impaction bone grafting for revision hip arthroplasty : biology and clinical applications", J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 14, pp.620~628 (2006)
- Patil N, "Cancellous impaction bone grafting of acetabular defects in complex primary and revision total hip arthroplasty", Orthopedics, 35, pp.e306~e312 (2012)
- Zehntner MK, "Midterm results (5.5-10 years) of acetabular allograft reconstruction with the acetabular reinforcement ring during total hip revision", J Arthroplasty, 9, pp.469~479 (1994)
- Tägil M., "The morselized and impacted bone graft. Animal experiments on proteins, impaction and load", Acta Orthop Scand Suppl, 290, pp.1~40 (2000)
- Jasty M, "Salvage total hip reconstruction in patients with major acetabular bone deficiency using structural femoral head allografts", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 72, pp.63~67 (1990)
- Berry DJ, "Revision arthroplasty using an antiprotrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 74, pp.711~715 (1992)
- Peters CL, "Acetabular revision with the Burch-Schnieder antiprotrusio cage and cancellous allograft bone", J Arthroplasty, 10, pp.307~312 (1995)
- Gill TJ, "The Bürch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty : indications, principles and long-term results", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80, pp.946~953 (1998)
- Regis D, "A minimum of 10-year follow-up of the Burch-Schneider cage and bulk allografts for the revision of pelvic discontinuity", J Arthroplasty, 27, pp.1057~1063 (2012)
- Nehme A, "Modular porous metal augments for treatment of severe acetabular bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 429, pp.201~208 (2004)
- Bobyn JD, "Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 81, pp.907~914 (1999)
- Van Kleunen JP, "Acetabular revisions using trabecular metal cups and augments", J Arthroplasty, 24(6 Suppl), pp.64~68 (2009)
- Ballester Alfaro JJ, "Trabecular Metal buttress augment and the Trabecular Metal cup-cage construct in revision hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity", Hip Int, 20(Suppl 7), pp.119~127 (2010)
- Malhotra R, "Trabecular metal acetabular revision system(cup-cage construct)to address the massive acetabular defects in revision arthroplasty", Indian J Orthop, 46, pp.483~486 (2012)
- Jansen JA, "Poor long-term clinical results of saddle prosthesis after resection of periacetabular tumors", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471, pp.324~331 (2013)