본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

치과용 레이저 및 임플란트 엔진 시스템의 사용자 만족도 비교 연구

The Comparative Study on User Satisfaction of Dental Laser and Implant Engine Systems

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of each system by examining the satisfaction of dentists with dental laser and implant engines. 21 dentists at Kyungpook National University dental hospital and the dental clinic in Daegu were selected. A multi-type laser and implant engine system (BLP10/CRB46LN/LSR20NN, Saeshin, Daegu, Republic of Korea), an implant engine system (SurgicPro+/X-DSG20L, NSK, Kanuma, Japan), and a laser engine system (Epic 10/surgical handpiece 6400479, Biolase, Irvine, USA) were used for evaluation. The survey was conducted with 10 items for the implant system and 9 items for the laser system. The blind test was conducted without providing product information. After using each product, the questions were evaluated using a 5-point Likerttype scale and the satisfaction of the dentist was quantified. The statistical significance for product comparison was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test (α=0.05). In the user satisfaction of the implant engine system, there was a significant difference when comparing Saeshin product and NSK product in ‘Cutting force when forming holes’ and ‘Fixability of the drill’ of functional items (P<0.05). In the user satisfaction of the laser engine system, there was a significant difference when comparing Saeshin product and Biolase product in ‘Adequacy of output during soft tissue incision’, ‘Ease to attachment and detachment of laser tip’, ‘Convenience of adjusting the angle of the laser tip’ of functional items (P<0.05). There was a significant difference in ‘Adequacy of handpiece weight’ and ‘Detachable method of laser tip’ in items for laser handpiece design (P<0.05). Each system had a significant difference in satisfaction with function and handpiece design, and improvements for each system could be observed.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of each system by examining the satisfaction of dentists with dental laser and implant engines. 21 dentists at Kyungpook National University dental hospital and the dental clinic in Daegu were selected. A multi-type laser and implant engine system (BLP10/CRB46LN/LSR20NN, Saeshin, Daegu, Republic of Korea), an implant engine system (SurgicPro+/X-DSG20L, NSK, Kanuma, Japan), and a laser engine system (Epic 10/surgical handpiece 6400479, Biolase, Irvine, USA) were used for evaluation. The survey was conducted with 10 items for the implant system and 9 items for the laser system. The blind test was conducted without providing product information. After using each product, the questions were evaluated using a 5-point Likerttype scale and the satisfaction of the dentist was quantified. The statistical significance for product comparison was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test (α=0.05). In the user satisfaction of the implant engine system, there was a significant difference when comparing Saeshin product and NSK product in ‘Cutting force when forming holes’ and ‘Fixability of the drill’ of functional items (P<0.05). In the user satisfaction of the laser engine system, there was a significant difference when comparing Saeshin product and Biolase product in ‘Adequacy of output during soft tissue incision’, ‘Ease to attachment and detachment of laser tip’, ‘Convenience of adjusting the angle of the laser tip’ of functional items (P<0.05). There was a significant difference in ‘Adequacy of handpiece weight’ and ‘Detachable method of laser tip’ in items for laser handpiece design (P<0.05). Each system had a significant difference in satisfaction with function and handpiece design, and improvements for each system could be observed.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Gold SI, "Pulsed laser beam effects on gingiva", J Clin Periodontol, 21, pp.391~396 (1994)
  2. Kim IS, "Analysis of clinical effect of CO2 laser illumination after surgical extraction of impacted third molar", J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg, 27, pp.349~352 (2001)
  3. Passes H, "A case study of lasers in cosmetic dentistry", Curr Opin Cosmet Dent, pp.92~99 (1995)
  4. 이두형, "다양한 임플란트 엔진 시스템에 대한 사용자 만족도 비교", 구강회복응용과학지, 30(1), pp.9~15 (2014), 대한턱관절교합학회[DOI]
  5. Sharawy M, "Heat generation during implant drilling : the significance of motor speed", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 60, pp.1160~1169 (2002)
  6. 고석민, "골밀도와 임플란트 안정성 변화에 대한 전향적 연구", 구강회복응용과학지, 29(1), pp.11~21 (2013), 대한턱관절교합학회
  7. Pick RM, "Current status of lasers in soft tissue dental surgery", J Periodontol, 64, pp.589~602 (1993)
  8. Hall RR, "The healing of tissues incised by a carbon dioxide laser", Br J Surg, 58, pp.222~225 (1971)
  9. Tosun E, "Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial effects of Er:YAG, diode, and CO2 lasers on titanium discs: and experimental study", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 70, pp.1064~1069 (2012)
  10. Rungruanganunt P, "The effect of static load on dental implant survival : a systematic review", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 28, pp.1218~1225 (2013)
  11. Pouradeli S, "Occupational stress and coping behaviours among dentists in kerman, Iran", Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J, 16, pp.e341~6 (2016)
  12. Yamalik N, "Analysis of the attitudes and needs", demands of dental practitioners in the field of patient safety and risk management, 2013, pp.63, 291~297
  13. 이재영, "일반 치과의원의 공간계획에 관한 사례 연구", KIEAE Journal, 13(1), pp.125~131 (2013), 한국생태환경건축학회
  14. Lee MJ, "Strategies for Promoting the Medical Device Industry in Korea : An Analytical Hierarchy Process Analysis", Int J Environ Res Public Health, 15, pp.2659~ (2018)
  15. Kreisler M, "Effect of Nd: YAG, Ho: YAG, Er: YAG, CO2, and GaAlAs Laser Irradiation on Surface Properties of Endosseous Dental Implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 17, pp.202~211 (2002)
  16. Li L, "The advances and characteristics of high-power diode laser materials processing", Opt laser Eng, 34, pp.231~253 (2000)
  17. 김임선, "Air-jet기능을 장착한 멀티형 복합유닛 핸드피스의 사용 만족도 조사", 대한치과기공학회지, 37(3), pp.169~178 (2015), 대한치과기공학회[DOI]
  18. Wichansky AM, "Usability testing in 2000 and beyond", Ergonomics, 43, pp.988~1006 (2000)
  19. 임현미, "A comparative study on the user satisfaction between two different piezoelectric engines", 구강회복응용과학지, 33(4), pp.269~277 (2017), 대한턱관절교합학회[DOI]
  20. Reifel NM, "Consumer satisfaction", Adv Dent Res, 11, pp.281~290 (1997)
  21. 김성민, "Evaluating usability of and satisfaction with two types of dental CAD software", 구강회복응용과학지, 35(1), pp.11~19 (2019), 대한턱관절교합학회[DOI]
  22. Dentsomboonrat P, "Development and evaluation:the satisfaction of using an oral health survey mobile application", Telemed. e-Health, 25, pp.55~59 (2019)
  23. 홍민호, "컴퓨터 단층 촬영을 기반으로 한 임플란트 가이드 시스템에 대한 임상가의 만족도 분석", 구강회복응용과학지, 31(3), pp.178~185 (2015), 대한턱관절교합학회[DOI]
  24. Likert R, "A technique for the measurement of attitudes", Arch Psychol, 140, pp.55~ (1932)
  25. Lijphart A. II, "The comparable-cases strategy in comparative research", Compar Pol Stud, 8, pp.158~177 (1975)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)