Why Change Is the Only Constant: The Teachings on Momentariness Found in Xuanzang’s Translation of the Abhidharma Treatises of Saṅghabhadra
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Within the Abhidharma literature, the doctrinal discussions on momentariness composed by the fifth-century C.E. Indic theorist, Saṅghabhadra, and rendered into Chinese by the pilgrim and scholar-monk, Xuanzang (602?–667 C.E.), stand as rigorous and detailed defenses of the Buddhist tenet of momentariness. This paper examines several passages on the doctrine of momentariness that are extant only within Xuanzang’s Chinese translations of two treatises by Saṅghabhadra, the Treatise Conforming to the Correct Logic of Abhidharma (Sanskrit, hereafter Skt. *Abhidharmanyāyānusāraśāstra; Chinese, hereafter Chi. Apidamo shun zhengli lun 阿毘達磨順正理論) and the Treatise Clarifying the Treasury of Abhidharma Tenets (Skt.*Abhidharmasamayapradīpikāśāstra; Chi. Apidamo zang xianzong lun 阿毘達磨顯宗論). In these masterworks, Saṅghabhadra uses the Abhidharma theory of the “conditioned factor” (Skt. saṃskṛta-dharma; Chi. youwei fa 有爲法)—the discrete entity that comes into being as the result of the myriad of “causes and conditions” (Skt. hetu-pratyaya; Chi. yin-yuan 因緣) that precede it—to construct a philosophical explanation for change as a pervasive and invariable feature of reality. In their meticulous translations and commentaries on these texts, Xuanzang and his Tang Dynasty disciples examine the four “stages” (Skt. avasthā; Chi. fenwei 分位) of a conditioned factor and reconsider the arguments enlisted by Saṅghabhadra to buttress the proposition that a conditioned factor activates another of its own kind in the moment that follows its cessation. This paper uses a source criticism research method to illustrate how several understudied translations of the Abhidharma works of Saṅghabhadra by Xuanzang—and the commentaries on these texts by his Tang disciples—contribute to the theoretical basis of the doctrine of momentariness within Chinese Buddhism.
Abstract
Within the Abhidharma literature, the doctrinal discussions on momentariness composed by the fifth-century C.E. Indic theorist, Saṅghabhadra, and rendered into Chinese by the pilgrim and scholar-monk, Xuanzang (602?–667 C.E.), stand as rigorous and detailed defenses of the Buddhist tenet of momentariness. This paper examines several passages on the doctrine of momentariness that are extant only within Xuanzang’s Chinese translations of two treatises by Saṅghabhadra, the Treatise Conforming to the Correct Logic of Abhidharma (Sanskrit, hereafter Skt. *Abhidharmanyāyānusāraśāstra; Chinese, hereafter Chi. Apidamo shun zhengli lun 阿毘達磨順正理論) and the Treatise Clarifying the Treasury of Abhidharma Tenets (Skt.*Abhidharmasamayapradīpikāśāstra; Chi. Apidamo zang xianzong lun 阿毘達磨顯宗論). In these masterworks, Saṅghabhadra uses the Abhidharma theory of the “conditioned factor” (Skt. saṃskṛta-dharma; Chi. youwei fa 有爲法)—the discrete entity that comes into being as the result of the myriad of “causes and conditions” (Skt. hetu-pratyaya; Chi. yin-yuan 因緣) that precede it—to construct a philosophical explanation for change as a pervasive and invariable feature of reality. In their meticulous translations and commentaries on these texts, Xuanzang and his Tang Dynasty disciples examine the four “stages” (Skt. avasthā; Chi. fenwei 分位) of a conditioned factor and reconsider the arguments enlisted by Saṅghabhadra to buttress the proposition that a conditioned factor activates another of its own kind in the moment that follows its cessation. This paper uses a source criticism research method to illustrate how several understudied translations of the Abhidharma works of Saṅghabhadra by Xuanzang—and the commentaries on these texts by his Tang disciples—contribute to the theoretical basis of the doctrine of momentariness within Chinese Buddhism.
참고문헌 (77)
- "sde dge Tibetan Tripiṭaka Bstan ‘gyur (Derge)" (1980)[URL]
- 高楠順次郎, "大正新修大藏經 1924–1932. 85 vols" (1932), 大正一切經刊刻會
- 河村考照, "卍新纂大日本續藏經" (1989), 國書刊行會
- "Abhidharmakośavṛttisūtrānurūpā; Chos mngon pa mdzod kyi bstan bcos kyi tshig le’ur byas pa’i rnam par bshad pa. Attributed to Saṅghabhadra (‘Dun bzang) and", or Vinītabhadra (‘Dul bzang)
- 眾賢, "Abhidharmasamayapradīpikāśāstra, *Abhidharmakośaśāstrakārikāvibhāṣya, or *Abhidharmapiṭakaprakaraṇaśāsanaśāstra; Apidamo zang xianzong lun 阿毘達摩藏顯宗論", ~
- 法寶, "Commentary on the Treasury of Abhidharma", ~
- 神泰, "Commentary on the Treasury of Abhidharma", ~
- 圓暉, "Commentary on the Verses of the Treasury of Abhidharma", ~
- Kuiji, "Concise Commentary on the Yogācārabhūmi", ~
- Xuanzang, "Demonstration of Consciousness-Only", ~
- Jingying Huiyuan, "Essay on the Mahāyāna Doctrines", ~ (1851)
- Xuanzang between, "Great Abhidharma Commentary", ~
- 靈泰, "Jottings on Kuiji’s Study Notes on the Cheng weishi lun", ~
- Huizhao, "Lamp of the Full Meaning of the Treatise Demonstrating Consciousness-Only", ~
- Kuiji, "The Nexus of the Treatise Demonstrating Consciousness-Only in the Palm of the Hand", ~
- 淨影慧遠, "Notes on the Doctrines of the Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra", ~
- 普光, "Notes on the Treasury of Abhidharma", ~
- 遁麟, "Notes on Yuanhui’s Commentary on the Treasury of Abhidharma", ~
- 智昇, "Record of Śākyamuniʼs Teachings Compiled During the Kaiyuan Period", ~
- 窺基, "Study Notes on the Treatise Demonstrating Consciousness-Only", ~
- 澄觀, "Subcommentary and Explanation of the Meaning of the Buddhāvataṃsakasūtra", ~
- Swami Dwarikadas Shastri, "Tattvasaṅgraha of Ācārya Śāntarakṣita with the pañjikā of Śrī Kamalaśīla" (1968), Baudda Bhārati
- Pralhad Pradhan, "Treasury of Abhidharma", Jayasawal Research Institute, 140~ (1967)
- Saṅghabhadra, "Treatise Conforming to the Correct Logic of Abhidharma", ~
- 塞建陀羅, "Treatise on Entering Abhidharma", ~
- 鳩摩羅什, "Verses of the Middle Way", ~
- Vidhushekhara Bhattacharya, "The Yogācārabhūmi of Ācārya Asaṅga: The Sanskrit Text Compared with the Tibetan Version" (1957), University of Calcutta
- 阿部 真也, "刹那滅について─倶舎論を中心として─", Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, 49(2), pp.804~806 (2001)
- 青原令知, "順正理論における有の体系", Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, 34(2), pp.765~768 (1986)
- BREWSTER, Ernest B., "Does the Cessation of an Entity Require an External Cause? The Debate between Vasubandhu and Saṅghabhadra on the Causality of Cessation as Translated by Xuanzang", ~
- 陳世賢, "法體與時間關係之研究--以俱舍論與順正理論對 三世實有之論辯為主", Ph.D, pp.2008
- CHEN, Shixian, "世親、眾賢對三世實有思想所據認識條件的論辯", 正觀, 42, pp.135~187 (2007)
- COX, Collett, "From Category to Ontology: The Changing Role of Dharma in Sarvāstivāda Abhidharma", Journal of Indian Philosophy, 32(5), pp.543~597 (2004)
- COX, Collett, "Sarvāstivāda Buddhist Scholasticism", pp.138~154 (1998), Brill
- COX, Collett, "Disputed Dharmas: Early Buddhist Theories on Existence" (1995), University of Washington Press
- COX, Collett, "On the Possibility of a Nonexistent Object of Consciousness: Sarvāstivādin and Dārśṭāntika Theories", Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 11(1), pp.31~87 (1988)
- DELHEY, Martin, "Cross-Cultural Transmission of Buddhist Texts: Theories and Practices of Translation", pp.51~81 (2016), Department of Indian and Tibetan Studies, Universität Hamburg
- DESSEIN, Bart, "ime, Temporality, and the Characteristic Marks of the Conditioned: Sarvāstivāda and Madhyamaka Buddhist Interpretations", Asian Philosophy, 21(4), pp.341~360 (2011)
- DESSEIN, Bart, "The Existence of Factors in the Three Time Periods: Sarvāstivāda and Madhyamaka Buddhist Interpretations of Difference in Mode, Difference in Characteristic Marks, Difference in State, and Mutual Difference", Acta Orientalia, 60(3), pp.331~350 (2007)
- DHAMMAJOTI, K. L., "Entry into the Supreme Doctrine: Skandhila’s Abhidharmāvatāra" (2008), University of Hong Kong
- DHAMMAJOTI, K. L., "Abhidharma Doctrines and Controversies on Perception" (2007), Centre of Buddhist Studies, University of Hong Kong
- DHAMMAJOTI, K. L., "Sarvāstivāda Abhidharma" (2007), Centre of Buddhist Studies, University of Hong Kong
- DHAMMAJOTI, K. L., "The Sarvāstivāda Doctrine of Simultaneous Causality", Journal of Buddhist Studies, 1, pp.17~54 (2003)
- FRAUWALLNER, Erich, "Studies in Abhidharma Literature and the Origins of Buddhist Philosophical Systems" (1995), SUNY Press
- 福田 琢, "順正理論における有為の四相", Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, 37(1), pp.60~62 (1988)
- "Analytic Philosophy in Early Modern India" (2019)[URL]
- GANERI, Jonardon, "The Self: Naturalism, Consciousness, and the First-Person Stance" (2012), Oxford University Press
- GARFIELD, Jay L., "Engaging Buddhism: Why It Matters to Philosophy" (2015), Oxford University Press
- GOLD, Jonathan C., "The Oxford Handbook of Indian Philosophy", pp.152~170 (2017), Oxford University Press
- HAWLEY, Katherine, "How Things Persist" (2002), Oxford University Press
- HAYASHI, I., "Can Flux Bring About Flux? An Appraisal of the Buddhist Momentarist’s Response to the Causal Objection", Journal of Indian Philosophy, 45(1), pp.49~71 (2017)
- 平川 彰, "Buddhist Chinese-Sanskrit Dictionary" (1997), Reiyukai
- 平川 彰, "平川彰著作集第2巻原始仏教とアビダルマ仏教" (1991), 春秋社
- 平川 彰, "Index to the Abhidharmakośabhāṣyam" (1973), Daizō Shuppan
- 広瀬 智一, "Abhidharmadīpa ni miru Sahetukavināśa", Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, 66(1), pp.102~106 (1985)
- 加藤 宏道, "有為の四相の定義", Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, 40(1), pp.35~39 (1991)
- 桂 紹隆, "初期仏教からアビダルマへ：桜部建博士喜寿記念論集", pp.259~276 (2002), 平楽寺書店
- 桑月 心, "刹那滅論証をめぐる問題", Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, 32(2), pp.1025~1029 (1984)
- La Vallée Poussin, Louis de, "L'Abhidharmakośa de Vasubandhu" (1926), Paul Geutner
- 松島 央龍, "Saṃghabhadra on karma and momentariness: bīja-theory and three other metaphors", Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, 58(3), pp.43~57 (2010)
- 松島 央龍, "衆賢の刹那滅論証", 仏教学研究, 65, pp.21~50 (2009)
- MEJOR, Marek, "Vasubandhu’s Abhidharmakośa and the Commentaries Preserved in the Tanjur" (1991), Franz Steiner Verlag
- 三友 健容, "『アビダルマディーパ 』における滅不待因論争", Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, 37(2), pp.916~922 (1989)
- 三友 健容, "旧随界說について", Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, 29(1), pp.25~30 (1980)
- MOOKERJEE, S., "The Buddhist Philosophy of Universal Flux" (2006), Motilal Banarsidass
- PRUDEN, Leo, "Abhidharmakośabhāṣyam of Vasubandhu" (1990), Asian Humanities Press
- "Abhidharma" (2018)[URL]
- 櫻部建, "Genjō yaku Kusharon ni okeru tai no go ni tsuite玄奘譯俱舍論における體の語について", 印度學佛教學研究, 2(2), pp.617~618 (1954)
- SANDERSON, Alexis, "The Sarvāstivāda and Its Critics: Anātmavāda and the Theory of Karma", Buddhism into the Year 2000: International Conference Proceedings, pp.33~48 (2000), Dhammakaya Foundation
- SHARF, Robert, "he Looping Structure of Buddhist Thought", Journal of the American Academy of Religion
- SHARF, Robert, "Knowing Blue: Early Buddhist Accounts of Non-Conceptual Sense", Philosophy East and West, 68(3), pp.826~870 (2018)
- SHIGA, Kiyokuni, "How to Deal with Future Existence: Sarvāstivāda, Yogic Perception, and Causality", Journal of Indian Philosophy, 46(3), pp.437~454 (2018)
- VAN VELTHEM, M., "Le Traité de la Descente dans la Profonde Loi de l 'Arhat Skandhila" (1977), Université catholique de Louvain, Institut orientaliste
- VON ROSPATT, Alexander, "The Buddhist Doctrine of Momentariness: A Survey of the Origins and Early Phase of this Doctrine up to Vasubandhu" (1995), Steiner
- 印順, "說一切有部爲主的論書與論師之硏究" (1978), Zhengwen chubanshe
- 吉水 千鶴子, "恒常なものはなぜ無能力か―刹那滅論証の理論的背景", Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, 48(1), pp.196~200 (2013)
- YOSHIMIZU, Chizuko, "The Development of Sattvānumāna from the Refutation of a Permanent Existent in the Sautrāntika Tradition", Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens, 43, pp.231~254 (1999)