Two Meanings of saṃjñā in the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya and Puguang’s 普光 Interpretations of saṃjñākaraṇa in the Jushelun ji 俱舍論記
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research investigates Puguang’s 普光 exegesis on the Sanskrit compound saṃjñākaraṇa of the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya (AKBh). In his commentary of the AKBh, the Jushelun ji 俱舍論記 (T1821), he introduces four interpretations of this compound. The first is based on understanding the compound as the bahuvrīhi. The second and the third are based on understanding it as the tatpuruṣa. The last is based on understanding it as the karmadhāraya. Previous studies regard the karmadhāraya interpretation as Puguang’s addition that is not found in earlier commentary. In contrast, I argue it is the bahuvrīhi interpretation that the earlier commentator, Yaśomitra, did not introduce. Moreover, the karmadhāraya interpretation is also applied by the Tibetan translator and Paramārtha, one of two Chinese translators of the AKBh. For this argument, I explore two meanings of saṃjñā: ideation and word. The tatpuruṣa and the bahuvrīhi interpretations are based on the understanding of the saṃjñā as ideation, but the karmadhāraya interpretation is based on the understanding of saṃjñā as word.
Abstract
This research investigates Puguang’s 普光 exegesis on the Sanskrit compound saṃjñākaraṇa of the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya (AKBh). In his commentary of the AKBh, the Jushelun ji 俱舍論記 (T1821), he introduces four interpretations of this compound. The first is based on understanding the compound as the bahuvrīhi. The second and the third are based on understanding it as the tatpuruṣa. The last is based on understanding it as the karmadhāraya. Previous studies regard the karmadhāraya interpretation as Puguang’s addition that is not found in earlier commentary. In contrast, I argue it is the bahuvrīhi interpretation that the earlier commentator, Yaśomitra, did not introduce. Moreover, the karmadhāraya interpretation is also applied by the Tibetan translator and Paramārtha, one of two Chinese translators of the AKBh. For this argument, I explore two meanings of saṃjñā: ideation and word. The tatpuruṣa and the bahuvrīhi interpretations are based on the understanding of the saṃjñā as ideation, but the karmadhāraya interpretation is based on the understanding of saṃjñā as word.
참고문헌 (29)
- Prahlad Pradhan, "AKBh Abhidharmakośabhāṣya (Vasubandhu)", K. P. Jayaswal Research Institute, ~ (1967)
- Unrai Wogihara, "AKV Sphutārthā Abhidharmakośavyākhyā", Sankibo, ~ (1971)
- "Apidamo fazhi lun 阿毘達磨發智論 (T1544)", ~
- "Apidamo jushe lun 阿毘達磨倶舍論 (T1558)", ~
- "Apidamo jushe shilun 阿毘達磨倶舍釋論 (T1559)", ~
- "Apidamo shunzhengli lun 阿毘達磨順正理論 (T1562)", ~
- Franklin Edgerton, "BHSD Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit Grammar and Dictionary, Vol. II" (1953), Yale University Press
- "Chos mngon pa'i mdzod kyi bshad pa (D.4090)", ~
- "D Derge Tanjur", ~
- "Jushelun ji 俱舍論記 (T1821)", ~
- M. Monier-Williams, "MW A Sanskrit-English Dictionary: Etymologically and Philologically Arranged with Special Reference to Cognate Indo-European Languages" (1899), The Clarendon Press
- Wezler, Albrecht, "T Taishō Shinshū DaizōkyōYD Yuktidīpikā: The most significant commentary on the Sāṃkhyakārikā", Franz Steiner, ~ (1998)
- Abhyankar, Kashnath Vasudev, "A Dictionary of Sanskrit Grammar" (1986), Oriental Institute
- Bronkhorst, Johannes, "Language and Reality" (2011), Brill
- Bronkhorst, Johannes, "How the Brahmins Won : From Alexander to the Guptas" (2016), Brill
- Choi, Seongho, "The Relationship between nāman, pada, and vyañjana in Sarvāstivāda and Yogācāra Literature", Puṣpikā, Proceedings of the 12th International Indology Graduate Research Symposium, 6, pp.53~66 (2023), Heidelberg Asian Studies Publishing
- Cox, Collett, "Disputed Dharmas: Early Buddhist Theories on Existence", The International Institute for Buddhist Studies, ~ (1995)
- Gethin, Rupert, "The five khandhas : Their treatment in the Nikāyas and early Abhidhamma", Journal of Indian Philosophy, 14(1), pp.35~53 (1986)
- Goldman, Robert P., "Devavāṇipraveśikā:An Introduction to the Sanskrit Language" (2004), Center for South and Southeast Asia Studies, University of California
- Jaini, Padmanabh S., "The Vaibhāṣika Theory of Words and Meanings", Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 22(1, pp.3) (1959), 95~107
- Johansson, Rune Edvin Anders, "The Dynamic Psychology of Early Buddhism" (1979), Curzon Press
- Kramer, Jowita, "Descriptions of ‘Feeling’(vedanā), ‘Ideation’(saṃjñā), and ‘the Unconditioned’(asaṃskṛta)in Vasubandhu’s Pañcaskandhaka and Sthiramati’s Pañcaskandhakavibhāṣā", Rocznik Orientalistyczny (Yearbook of Oriental Studies), 65(1), pp.120~139 (2012)
- Lee, Jongcheol, "On Vasbandhu’s View of Language", Philosophical Forum, 23, pp.23~62 (1995)
- Nasu, Enshō, "The philosophy of Language in the Abhidhar -makośabhāṣya", Journal of Pāli and Buddhist Studies, 26(0), pp.41~62 (2012)
- Schmithausen, Lambert, "The Genesis of Yogācāra-Vijñānavāda: Responses and Reflections", International Institute for Buddhist Studies, ~ (2014)
- Stcherbatsky, Theodore, "The Central Conception of Buddhism and the Meaning of the Word “Dharma”", Royal Asiatic Society, ~ (1923)
- Tseng, Vinita, "A unique collection of twenty Sūtras in a Sanskrit manuscript from the Potala, Vol. I", pp.2010, China Tibetology Publication House
- Uesugi, Nobuaki, "The theory of language in the Abhidharma Buddhism", Buddhist Seminar, 30, pp.26~45 (1979)
- Vetter, Tilmann, "The ‘Khandha Passages’ in the Vinayapiṭaka and the Four Main Nikāyas" (2000), Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften