본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

집단지성과 성과창출을 위한 통합적 개념틀 검토

An Integrative Framework for Creating Collective Intelligence and Enhancing Performance

류수영|추철호
한국지식경영학회 (The Knowledge Management Society of Korea)|2018.09|지식경영연구 (Knowledge Management Research)|제19권 제3호|pp. 173-187|DOI 10.15813/kmr.2018.19.3.008

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

knowledge managementlearning organizationorganizational learningcollective intelligencegroup performance
주제분류경영학

초록

This study was aimed at suggesting an integrative framework for creating collective intelligence and enhancing group performance after reviewing previous studies including those related to learning organizations, organizational learning, knowledge management, and collective intelligence. In the first, we examined that the similarities and differences between collective intelligence and other similar concepts, such as learning organizations, organizational learning, and knowledge management. Next, an integrative framework for creating collective intelligence and channeling it into strong group performance were suggested. In this process, we reviewed conditions for creating collective intelligence and segmented the major variables as expectancy, valence, and instrumentality, according to Vroom's (1964) expectancy theory. Characteristics of problems and the roles of leaders were respectively considered as valence for inducing collaboration and expectancy for managing probability to achieve goals. Instrumental factors were also adopted from conditions for creating group intelligence suggested from several researchers, such as creativity, openness, willingness for working together, horizontal communication, centralization in decision making, and building effective information and communication technology system and active usage of it. We discussed two potentially disputable matters about the scope and level of collective intelligence and group performance and suggest several theoretical and practical implications in the Discussion.

Abstract

This study was aimed at suggesting an integrative framework for creating collective intelligence and enhancing group performance after reviewing previous studies including those related to learning organizations, organizational learning, knowledge management, and collective intelligence. In the first, we examined that the similarities and differences between collective intelligence and other similar concepts, such as learning organizations, organizational learning, and knowledge management. Next, an integrative framework for creating collective intelligence and channeling it into strong group performance were suggested. In this process, we reviewed conditions for creating collective intelligence and segmented the major variables as expectancy, valence, and instrumentality, according to Vroom's (1964) expectancy theory. Characteristics of problems and the roles of leaders were respectively considered as valence for inducing collaboration and expectancy for managing probability to achieve goals. Instrumental factors were also adopted from conditions for creating group intelligence suggested from several researchers, such as creativity, openness, willingness for working together, horizontal communication, centralization in decision making, and building effective information and communication technology system and active usage of it. We discussed two potentially disputable matters about the scope and level of collective intelligence and group performance and suggest several theoretical and practical implications in the Discussion.

참고문헌 (68)

  1. 김길모, "집단지성을 활용한 문제중심학습 기반 프로그래밍 수업 모형 개발", 컴퓨터교육학회 논문지, 14(2), pp.23~32 (2011), 한국컴퓨터교육학회[DOI]
  2. 김자희, "Web 2.0", ie매거진, 14(4), pp.30~33 (2007)
  3. 박오수, "조직학습에 관한 이론적 고찰", 경영논집, 31(3-4), pp.93~130 (1997)
  4. 박재천, "웹 2.0플랫폼에서의 집단지성 활용방안 연구-교육분야에서의 적용을 중심으로", 8(2), pp.15~20 (2007), 한국인터넷정보학회
  5. 서리빈, "개방형 혁신과 조직학습 특성이 벤처기업의 기술경쟁우위에 미치는 영향", 지식경영연구, 13(2), pp.73~93 (2012), 한국지식경영학회[DOI]
  6. 안효영, "집단 지성 기반 비즈니스 모델 사례 연구", Entrue Journal of Information Technology, 12(1), pp.151~164 (2013), 엘지씨엔에스
  7. 양미경, "집단지성의 구현을 위한 협력학습의 원리 탐색", 교육방법연구, 23(2), pp.457~483 (2011), 한국교육방법학회[DOI]
  8. 윤호성, "소셜네트워크를 이용한 집단지성 측정연구", 디지털융복합연구, 9(2), pp.53~63 (2011), 한국디지털정책학회
  9. 송윤희, "집단지성 측정도구 개발 및 타당화", 교과교육학연구, 20(5), pp.395~406 (2016), 교과교육연구소[DOI]
  10. "글로벌 오픈이노베이션 현장을 가다 上" (2010)[URL]
  11. 조윤형, "조직의 지식창출에 대한 학습조직의 구조적 특성 및 학습자 특성의 효과 : 인지된 조직지원의 조절효과", 지식경영연구, 12(1), pp.17~37 (2011), 한국지식경영학회[DOI]
  12. 조화순, "집단지성의 정치경제" (2011), 한울
  13. 피에르 레비, "집단지성: 사이버 공간의 인류학을 위하여", pp.38~ (2002), 문학과 지성사
  14. 피에르 레비, "누스페어: 새로운 철학, 새로운 문명, 새로운 세계(Noosphere)" (2003), 생각의 나무
  15. 가치창출의 새로운 원천, 집단지성, "채승병", 1~22, pp.CEO Information 778 (2010)
  16. 최수형, "동료에 대한 신뢰가 집단성과에 미치는 영향 - 집단지성의 매개효과와 과업상호의존성의 조절효과 -", 인적자원관리연구, 22(1), pp.147~169 (2015), 한국인적자원관리학회[DOI]
  17. 추철호, "새로운 삼성전기 기업문화개발 사례연구: 전문성과 실시간 소통을 통한 집단지성 극대화", Korea Business Review, 19(1), pp.57~84 (2015), 한국경영학회
  18. 키스 소여, "그룹지니어스" (2011), 북섬
  19. 황대기, "경영조직의 학습유형과 조직특성·조직성과간의 관련성", 박사, 경영학, pp.2002
  20. Anderson, J. R., "Learning and memory: An integrated approach" (1995), Wiley
  21. Argote, L., "Organizational learning" (2013), Springer
  22. Ärtenblad, A., "On differences between organizational learning and learning organization", The Learning Organization, 8(3), pp.125~133 (2001)
  23. Ärtenblad, A., "The learning organization: Towards an integrated model", The Learning Organization, 11(2), pp.129~144 (2004)
  24. Boder. A., "Collective intelligence: A keystone in knowledge management", Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1), pp.81~93 (2006)
  25. Bonabeau, E., "Decision 2.0: The power of collective intelligence", MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(2), pp.45~52 (2009)
  26. Bruns, A., "Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From production to produsage" (2008), Peter Lang
  27. Brahma, S., "Understanding researchable issues in knowledge management: A literature review", The IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(4), pp.43~68 (2015)
  28. Campion, M. A., "Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups", Personnel Psychology, 46, pp.823~850 (1993)
  29. Cyert, R. M., "A behavioral theory of the firm" (1963), Prentice-Hall
  30. Coon, D., "Introduction to psychology" (1983), West Publishing Co
  31. Dalkir, K., "Knowledge management in theory and practice" (2005), MIT Press
  32. Deary, I. J., "Intelligence", Annual Review of Psychology, 63, pp.453~482 (2012)
  33. Drucker, P., "Post-capitalist society" (1993), HarperBusiness
  34. Drucker, P., "The information executives truly need", Harvard Business Review, 73(1), pp.54~62 (1995)
  35. Gross, R., "Psychology: The science of mind and behaviour" (2010), Hodder Education Publishers
  36. Huysman, M., "An organizational learning approach to the learning organization", European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(2), pp.133~145 (2000)
  37. Expanding the innovation horizon: Global CEO study 2006, "IBM", IBM Corp, ~ (2006)
  38. Kim, P., "Collective intelligence ratio: Measurement of real time multimodal interactions in team projects", Team Performance Management, 17(1, pp.2) (2011), 41~62
  39. Leadbeater, C., "We-think: Mass innovation, not mass production" (2009), Profile Books
  40. Levitt, B., "Organizational learning", Annual Review Sociology, 14, pp.319~340 (1988)
  41. Lévy, P., "Collective intelligence: Mankind’s emerging world in cyberspace", pp.13~ (1994), Basic Books
  42. Lindblom, C. E., "The “science” of muddling through", Public Administration Review, 19, pp.79~88 (1959)
  43. Livingstone, R. M., "Models for understanding collective intelligence on Wikipedia", Social Science Computer Review, 34(4), pp.497~508 (2016)
  44. Malone, T. W., "The collective intelligence genome", MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(3), pp.21~31 (2010)
  45. Marquardt, M., "Building the learning organization" (1996), McGraw-Hill
  46. Nelson, R. R., "An evolutionary theory of economic change" (1982), Harvard University Press
  47. Nonaka, I., "The knowledge creating company" (1995), Oxford University Press
  48. Ormrod, J. E., "Educational psychology: Developing learners", pp.170~ (2011), Allyn and Bacon Inc
  49. Piorkowski, B. A., "A dynamic knowledge management framework for the high value manufacturing industry", International Journal of Production Research, 51(7), pp.2176~2185 (2013)
  50. Ruggle, R., "The state of notion: Knowledge management in practice", California Management Review, 40(3), pp.80~89 (1998)
  51. Russell, P., "The global brain" (1983), J. P. Tarcher
  52. Senge, P. M., "The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization" (1990), Doubleday
  53. Siegel, S., "Level of aspiration and decision making", Psychological Review, 64(4), pp.253~262 (1957)
  54. Simon, H. A., "Birth of an organization: The economic cooperation administration", Public Administration Review, 13(4), pp.227~236 (1953)
  55. Simon, H. A., "A behavioral model of rational choice", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, pp.99~118 (1955)
  56. Spearman, C., "General intelligence, objectively determined and measured", American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), pp.201~293 (1904)
  57. Steinbruner, J. D., "The cybernetic theory of decision" (1974), Princeton University Press
  58. Sternberg, R. J., "The concept of intelligence and its role in lifelong learning and success", American Psychologist, 52(10), pp.1030~1037 (1997)
  59. Sun, P. Y. T., "Exploring the dive-organizational learning and learning organization", The Learning Organization, 10(4), pp.202~215 (2003)
  60. Surowiecki, J., "The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economics, societies, and nations" (2004), Doubleday
  61. Svobodová, A., "Collective intelligence and knowledge management as a tool for innovations", Economics and Management, 2011(16), pp.942~946 (2011)
  62. Tapscott, D., "Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything" (2008), Penguin Group USA
  63. Tapscott, D., "Macrowikinomics: Rebooting business and the world" (2010), Penguin Group USA
  64. Tsang, E. W. K., "Organizational learning and the learning organization: A dichotomy between descriptive and prescriptive research", Human Relations, 50(1), pp.73~89 (1997)
  65. Van der Spek, R., "Knowledge management and its integrative elements" (1997), CRC Press
  66. Vroom, V. H., "Work and motivation" (1964), Wiley
  67. Woolley, A. W., "Group intelligence and group performance", Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6), pp.420~424 (2015)
  68. Wheeler, W. M., "Ants: their structure, development and behavior" (1910), Columbia University Press

관련 논문AI추천

집단지성 발현의 선행요인 검토류수영, 추철호한국지식경영학회 · 지식경영연구2022 · 제23권 제3호팀 학습 행동의 통합적 고찰박정우한국지식경영학회 · 지식경영연구2024 · 제25권 제2호개인창의성과 집단창의성의 관계에서 통합능력과 지식공유의 매개효과김현진, 설현도한국지식경영학회 · 지식경영연구2014 · 제15권 제4호집단지성의 특성 및 기제와 교육적 시사점의 탐색양미경한국열린교육학회 · 열린교육연구2010 · 제18권 제4호조직구성원의 지식통합 역량에 대한 선행 요인과 지식창출 효과에 관한 연구: 융합 지향 조직을 중심으로서우종, 홍진원한국지식경영학회 · 지식경영연구2014 · 제15권 제4호조직의 지식창출에 대한 학습조직의 구조적 특성 및 학습자 특성의 효과 : 인지된 조직지원의 조절효과조윤형, 최우재한국지식경영학회 · 지식경영연구2011 · 제12권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

The Mediating Role of Creativity on Knowledge Management in Multinational Firms류지원, 양오석pp. 1-29지식자기효능감이 종업원의 지식공유의도에 미치는 영향: 개인성과기대 및 과업성과기대의 매개효과 검증심덕섭, 김형진, 이동윤pp. 31-46키워드 기반 문서 네트워크를 이용한네트워크형 지식지도 자동 구성유기동pp. 47-61특허 포트폴리오 구성과 신제품 출시 성과: 특허 재정비 활동의 조절효과를 중심으로김나미, 이종선pp. 63-87전시회 광고의 정보 품질과 매체 신뢰도가 광고태도 및 전시회 참관의도에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구: 전시회 유형을 중심으로함주연, 구철모, 김윤정pp. 89-112
원문 보기