본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

18세기 말-19세기 초 상호관계에 대한 라오스와 태국의 역사인식 차이

Differences in Historical Perceptions on Late Eighteenth-Early Nineteenth Century Mutual Relations between Laos and Thailand

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Laos and Thailand have been in culturally, politically and economically deep mutual relations. Histories of both states have been closely intertwined in many aspects. In their mutual historical relations, the Thai have often regarded Laos as a country which is dependent on or even subordinate to Thailand. It seems that they generally look down upon the Lao, while the Lao have a kind of cultural or psychological complex toward the Thai. Such a relationship seems to be also reflected in perception and assessment of mutual historical relations,especially those between late eighteenth and early nineteenth century. Siam attacked and occupied Lan Xang in late eighteenth century, reducing it to a vassal status. Lan Xang, under the leadership of Anouvong, king of Viangchan, ventured a resistance against the Siamese rule in the 1820s, which was suppressed by the Siamese army. Lan Xang remained a colony of Siam until 1893, when Siam ceded the territory of Laos to France. The Thai in general have been regarding the military resistance of Lan Xang as a rebellion, while the Lao call it "an independence war." Such a difference in historical assessment can be also ascertained in history text books of both countries. The following aspects have to be considered in comparing historical perceptions on relations between Laos and Thailand. The Thai seem to have a consciousness as injurer toward Laos,which they ruled as a vassal more than one hundred years, and whose resistance they cruelly suppressed. The Lao historiography in comparison, seems to pay more attention to the ethnic and cultural differences and boundaries between Laos and Thailand. They seem, at the same time, to try to bring to the fore the inflictions the Thai did to the Lao. It appears that they in this way attempt to strengthen the national identity vis-a-vis the Thai.

Abstract

Laos and Thailand have been in culturally, politically and economically deep mutual relations. Histories of both states have been closely intertwined in many aspects. In their mutual historical relations, the Thai have often regarded Laos as a country which is dependent on or even subordinate to Thailand. It seems that they generally look down upon the Lao, while the Lao have a kind of cultural or psychological complex toward the Thai. Such a relationship seems to be also reflected in perception and assessment of mutual historical relations,especially those between late eighteenth and early nineteenth century. Siam attacked and occupied Lan Xang in late eighteenth century, reducing it to a vassal status. Lan Xang, under the leadership of Anouvong, king of Viangchan, ventured a resistance against the Siamese rule in the 1820s, which was suppressed by the Siamese army. Lan Xang remained a colony of Siam until 1893, when Siam ceded the territory of Laos to France. The Thai in general have been regarding the military resistance of Lan Xang as a rebellion, while the Lao call it "an independence war." Such a difference in historical assessment can be also ascertained in history text books of both countries. The following aspects have to be considered in comparing historical perceptions on relations between Laos and Thailand. The Thai seem to have a consciousness as injurer toward Laos,which they ruled as a vassal more than one hundred years, and whose resistance they cruelly suppressed. The Lao historiography in comparison, seems to pay more attention to the ethnic and cultural differences and boundaries between Laos and Thailand. They seem, at the same time, to try to bring to the fore the inflictions the Thai did to the Lao. It appears that they in this way attempt to strengthen the national identity vis-a-vis the Thai.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Che Man, W. K., "Muslim Separatism: the Moros of Southern Philippines and the Malays of Southern Thailand" (1990), Oxford University Press
  2. Cho Hung-Guk, "Die politische Geschichte Thailands unter der Herrschaft König Narais (r. 1656-1688)" (1994), Munduksa
  3. Evans, Grant, "The Politics of Ritual and Remembrance: Laos since 1975" (1998), Silkworm Books
  4. Gützlaff, Karl Friedrich August, "Journal of Three Voyages along the Coast of China, in 1831, 1832, & 1833, with Notices of Siam, Corea, and the Loo-choo Islands, to Which is Prefixed an Introductory Essay on the Policy, Religion, etc., of China by the Rev. W. Ellis" (1834), F. Westley
  5. Hobsbawm, Eric, "The Nation as Invented Tradition, In Nationalism" (1994), Oxford University Press
  6. Jory, Patrick, "Problems in Contemporary Thai Nationalist Historiography", Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia, 3 (2003)
  7. Kemp, Jeremy, "Aspects of Siamese Kingship in the Seventeenth Century" (1969), Social Science Association Press of Thailand
  8. Manich, M. L., "History of Laos" (1967), Chalermnit
  9. Mayoury, "Lao Historiography and Historians: Case Study of the War between Bangkok and the Lao in 1827", Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 20(1), pp.55~69 (1989)
  10. Mayoury Ngaosyvathn, "Paths to Conflagration: Fifty Years of Diplomacy and Warfare in Laos, Thailand, and Vietnam, 1778-1828" (2004), Cornell University Press
  11. Mayoury, "Chao Anou (1767-1829), The Lao People, and Southeast Asia" (2010), Kasouang Thaleng Khao Lae Vatthanatham
  12. Rehbein, Boike, "Globalization, Culture and Society in Laos" (2007), Routledge
  13. Rong Syamananda, "A History of Thailand" (1981), Chulalongkorn University
  14. Scott, John, "A Dictionary of Sociology, The 3rd and Revised Edition" (2009), Oxford University Press
  15. Human Development Report 2011, "UNDP", ~ (2011)
  16. Vella, Walter F., "Siam Under Rama Ⅲ 1824-1851" (1957), J. J. Augustin Incorporated Publisher
  17. Vickery, Michael, "The Composition and Transmission of the Ayudhya and Cambodia Chronicles, In Perceptions of the Past in Southeast Asia" (1979), ASAA Southeast Asia Publication Series
  18. "Vientiane Times", ~
  19. Anat Ananphak, "국가 안보와 영토 확장: 라따나꼬신 왕조 초기(라마1세-라마3세) 큰 전쟁" (2011), Ypsy Group
  20. Damrong Rachanuphap, "짜오프라야 보딘데차(싱 싱하세니)의 역사, In Prawat chaophraya mahasena(bunnak) prawat chaophraya bodindecha(sing singhaseni) prawat chaophra yomarat(pan sukhum)" (1961), Ongkankha Khong Khurusapha
  21. Danai Chaiyotha, "태국의 역사: 톤부리 시대부터 라따나꼬신 시대까지" (2003), Odian Sato
  22. Khana Anoukammakan Thopthouan Hip-hom Le Khian Pavatsat Nakhon Louang Viangchan 450 Pi, "수도 위앙짠 450년 1560-2010년" (2010), Nakhon Louang Viangchan
  23. Kramon Thongthammachat, "중등과정 3학년 우리 의 나라 제4권" (2001), Akson Charoenthat
  24. Lamchun Huapcharoen, "시암의 역사와 왕조사" (2011), D.K. Book
  25. Narong Phuangphit, "중등과정 초급단계 태국의 국제관계사" (2001), Akson Charoenthat
  26. Phlai Noi, "태국 역사 사전, 4쇄 및 개정증보판" (1992), Bamrungsan
  27. Phlapphlueng Khongchana, "중등과정 초급단계 태국의 국제관계사" (2000), Doe Mattoe Krup Maenetmen
  28. Phouthong Seng-akhom, "라오 민족과 라오인 - 과거와 현재" (2006), Nakhon Louang Viangchan
  29. , Krung Thep: Samnak-ngan Khana Kammakan Kansueksa Khan Phuenthan, Krasuang Sueksathikan, , 2012
  30. , Krung Thep: Samnak-ngan Khana Kammakan Kansueksa Khan Phuenthan, Krasuang Sueksathikan, , 2011
  31. , Krung Thep: Samnak-ngan Khana Kammakan Kansueksa Khan Phuenthan, Krasuang Sueksathikan, , 2010
  32. , Krung Thep: Samnak-ngan Khana Kammakan Kansueksa Khan Phuenthan, Krasuang Sueksathikan, , 2010
  33. Ratchabandit Sathan, "타이어 문자의 로마자 표기 규칙" (1999), Ratchabandit Sathan
  34. Saloemsak Phaboutdi, "중등과정 1년 라오 역사교과서" (2010), Kaxouang Sueksathikan Sathaban Khonkhoa Vithanyasat Kansueksa
  35. Thiphakorawong, Chaophraya, "라마3세 치세 라따 나꼬신 왕조사, 2 Volumes" (1961), Ongkankha Khong Khurusapha
  36. Wongsathiratsanit, Kromluang, "왕실 자필본 왕조사, 4 Volumes" (1952), Odian Sato

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)