본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

Bidirectionality in the Interaction between At-Issue and Not-At-Issue Content

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper explores the difference of status of the two implications that arise from Korean evidential sentences, and their interactions in the course of interpretation. The research shows that at-issue content and not-at-issue content interact bi-directionally in the temporal and modal interpretation of an evidential sentence. As such, the empirical patterns observed in Korean evidential sentences pose a problem for the formal systems that have been proposed by Faller (2002) and Potts (2005), and argue for a dynamic semantic approach to at-issue/not-at-issue meaning distinctions and their interactions. The study provides a formal dynamic semantic analysis in line with Murray (2010) and AnderBois et al. (2015).

Abstract

This paper explores the difference of status of the two implications that arise from Korean evidential sentences, and their interactions in the course of interpretation. The research shows that at-issue content and not-at-issue content interact bi-directionally in the temporal and modal interpretation of an evidential sentence. As such, the empirical patterns observed in Korean evidential sentences pose a problem for the formal systems that have been proposed by Faller (2002) and Potts (2005), and argue for a dynamic semantic approach to at-issue/not-at-issue meaning distinctions and their interactions. The study provides a formal dynamic semantic analysis in line with Murray (2010) and AnderBois et al. (2015).

참고문헌 (58)

  1. Abbott, B., "Presuppositions as nonassertions", Journal of Pragmatics, 32, pp.1419~1437 (2000)
  2. Amaral, P., "Review of The Logic of Conventional Implicatures by Chris Potts", Linguistics and Philosophy, 30, pp.707~749 (2007)
  3. AnderBois, S., "Sluicing as anaphora to issues", Proceedings of SALT, 20, pp.451~470 (2010)
  4. AnderBois, S., "At-issue proposals and appositive impositions in discourse", Journal of Semantics, 32, pp.93~139 (2015)
  5. Beaver, D., "Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics" (2001), CSLI Publications
  6. Chierchia, G., "Meaning and Grammar" (1990), MIT Press
  7. Choi, H-B., "Wuli Malbon(Our Grammar)" (1983), Chungumsa
  8. Chung, K., "Space in Tense: The Interaction of Tense, Aspect, Evidentiality and Speech Act in Korean", Ph.D., pp.2005
  9. Chung, K., "Spatial deictic tense and evidentials in Korean", Natural Language Semantics, 15, pp.187~219 (2007)
  10. Chung, K., "Korean evidentials and assertion", Lingua, 120, pp.932~952 (2010)
  11. Collins, J. N., "Parenthesis and Ellipsis: Studies in Generative Grammar 121", pp.47~73 (2014), De Gruyter
  12. Dowty, D., "The effects of aspectual class on the temporal structure of discourse : Semantics or pragmatics?", Linguistics and Philosophy, 9, pp.37~61 (1986)
  13. Faller, M., "Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua", Ph.D., pp.2002
  14. Ginzburg, J., "Questions, Queries, and Facts: A Semantics and Pragmatics for Interrogatives", Ph.D., pp.1992
  15. Grice, P., "The Logic of Grammar", pp.64~75 (1975), Dickenson
  16. Groenendijk, J., "Modality and conversational information", Theoretical Linguistics, 2, pp.61~112 (1975)
  17. Gunlogson, C., "True to Form: Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English", Ph.D., pp.2001
  18. Hinrichs, E., "Temporal anaphora in discourses of English", Linguistics and Philosophy, 9, pp.63~82 (1986)
  19. Kamp, H., "From Discourse to Logic" (1993), Kluwer
  20. Karttunen, L., "Syntax and Semantics 1", pp.1~20 (1972), Academic Press
  21. Karttunen, L., "Presuppositions and linguistic context", Theoretical Linguistics, 1, pp.182~194 (1974)
  22. Karttunen, L., "Conventional implicature", Syntax and Semantics, 11, pp.1~56 (1979)
  23. Kratzer, A., "Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research", pp.639~650 (1991), Mouton de Gruyter
  24. Lee, C., "Evidentials and Epistemic Modal in Korean- Evidence from their interactions", pp.2010
  25. Lee, J., "Evidentiality and its interaction with tense: Evidence from Korean", Ph.D., pp.2011
  26. Lee, J., "Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 8", pp.287~311 (2011)
  27. Lee, J., "Temporal constraints on the meaning of evidentiality", Natural Language Semantics, 21, pp.1~41 (2013)
  28. Jungmee Lee, "Meaning classes of evidential implications across languages", 언어연구, 33(3), pp.437~461 (2016), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  29. 임동식, "On the Interaction between Lexical Aspects of Predicates and Evidentiality - A situation-semantics account -", 언어학, (70), pp.117~140 (2014), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
  30. Matthewson, L., "The Linguistic Variation Yearbook 7" (2007), John Benjamins
  31. McCready, E., "Varieties of conventional implicature", Semantics and Pragmatics, 3, pp.1~57 (2010)
  32. Murray, E. S., "Evidentiality and the Structure of Speech Acts", Ph.D., pp.2010
  33. Nouwen, R., "On appositives and dynamic binding", Research on Language and Computation, 5, pp.87~102 (2007)
  34. Papafragou, A., "Epistemic modality and truth conditions", Lingua, 116, pp.1688~1702 (2006)
  35. Partee, B., "Nominal and temporal anaphora", Lingusitics and Philosophy, 7, pp.243~286 (1984)
  36. Portner, P., "Imperatives and modals", Natural Language Semantics, 15, pp.351~383 (2007)
  37. Portner, P., "Modality" (2009), Oxford University Press
  38. Potts, C., "The Logic of Conventional Implicatures" (2005), Oxford University Press
  39. Potts, C., "The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces", pp.475~501 (2007), Oxford University Press
  40. Roberts, C., "Modal Subordination, Anaphora and Distributivity" (1987), Garland
  41. Roberts, C., "Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse", Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, pp.689~721 (1989)
  42. Roberts, C., "Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 49" (1996), The Ohio State University, Department of Linguistics
  43. Roberts, C., "Only, presupposition and implicature", Accepted with revisions by Journal of Semantics (2006)
  44. Roberts, C., "Presupposition, conventional implicature, and beyond: a unified account of projection", the 2009 ESSLLI workshop “New Directions in the Theory of Presupposition” (2009)
  45. Shannon, B., "On the two kinds of presuppositions in natural language", Foundations of Language, 14, pp.247~249 (1976)
  46. Simons, M., "What projects and why", Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT), 20, pp.309~327 (2010), Cornell University
  47. Sohn, H., "Retrospection in Korean", Language Research, 11, pp.87~103 (1975)
  48. Sohn, S., "Tense and Aspect in Korean" (1999), University of Hawaii Press
  49. 송재목, "A Typological Analysis of the Korean Evidential Marker -te-", 언어학, (32), pp.149~166 (2002), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  50. Stalnaker, R., "Semantics and Philosophy", pp.197~213 (1974), New York University Press
  51. Stalnaker, R., "Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics", pp.315~322 (1987)
  52. Suh, C., "–Te-nun hoysanguy kinungul kacinunka? Congkyelpepkwa inyongpepuy –te-lul cwungsimulo(Does –te have a retrospective function? Focusing on the sentence-final –te and the –te in quotations)", Ene (Linguistic Journal of Korea), 2, pp.97~127 (1977)
  53. Tonhauser, J., "Toward a taxonomy of projective content", Language, 89, pp.66~109 (2013)
  54. von Fintel, K., "Descriptions and Beyond" (2004), Oxford University Press
  55. von Fintel, K., "Epistemic modals for dummies" (2006), MIT and University of Michigan
  56. von Fintel, K., "manuscript, MIT and University of Michigan, to appear in Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Vol. 2" (2007), Oxford University Press
  57. von Fintel, K., "Must. . . Stay. . . Strong!", Natural Language Semantics, 18, pp.351~383 (2010)
  58. Yang, I-S., "Korean syntax: Case markers, delimiters, complementation, and relativization", Ph.D., pp.1972

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)