탈현대적 가정교육을 위한 제언-'주역'을 바탕으로-
A Suggestion for Post-Modern Home Education
1
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As social structures has changed, so have the family roles. In the pre-modern society, family took part of socializing and educating children through home training. But, in modern society, family has transferred its economic, educational, religious, and political functions to the respective professional organizations and has lost these functions. Nevertheless, one of the most important roles of family is home education and the disciplining role of family can not be emphasized too much in the rapidly changing social structures such as modern society. The present state of home education can be characterized as follows. First, modern home education has lost its directions about what to pursue and what to teach. Second, the objective of modern home education is focused on aiding children to achieve the modern style success. Third, the main concern of modern home education is to help children to overcome and solve their problems. The above-mentioned features of modern home education only serve to expand the ego of children but the ultimate happiness can not be obtained through the expansion of ego. Given this, this is the time to face the problems of modern home education and develop some arguments of new home education for post-modern society. Modern society is destined to give its way to post-modern society, where the purpose and content of general education will be changed and thus the purpose and quality of home education will be changed, too. In order to map out post-modern home education, this paper attempts to set up the purpose of post-modern home education, to plan its content, and to propose the methods of post-modern home education. The proposal for post-modern home education will be based on I-Ching, which can provide practical and concrete answers for the questions made in modern society because it includes plenty of creative wisdoms.
Abstract
As social structures has changed, so have the family roles. In the pre-modern society, family took part of socializing and educating children through home training. But, in modern society, family has transferred its economic, educational, religious, and political functions to the respective professional organizations and has lost these functions. Nevertheless, one of the most important roles of family is home education and the disciplining role of family can not be emphasized too much in the rapidly changing social structures such as modern society. The present state of home education can be characterized as follows. First, modern home education has lost its directions about what to pursue and what to teach. Second, the objective of modern home education is focused on aiding children to achieve the modern style success. Third, the main concern of modern home education is to help children to overcome and solve their problems. The above-mentioned features of modern home education only serve to expand the ego of children but the ultimate happiness can not be obtained through the expansion of ego. Given this, this is the time to face the problems of modern home education and develop some arguments of new home education for post-modern society. Modern society is destined to give its way to post-modern society, where the purpose and content of general education will be changed and thus the purpose and quality of home education will be changed, too. In order to map out post-modern home education, this paper attempts to set up the purpose of post-modern home education, to plan its content, and to propose the methods of post-modern home education. The proposal for post-modern home education will be based on I-Ching, which can provide practical and concrete answers for the questions made in modern society because it includes plenty of creative wisdoms.
참고문헌 (33)
- 강준모, "에밀에 나타난 가정교육론", 한국초등교육, 6, pp.153~174 (1993), 서울교육대학교 초등교육연구원
- 강충열, "자녀를 영재로 키우는 가정교육 ‘10訓’", 아동교육, 16(1), pp.31~48 (2007), 한국아동교육학회
- 김경숙, "강남 학부모의 자녀 학업지원활동 특성과 자녀교육에 대한 신념", 박사, pp.2009
- 김대진, "주역전의대전" (1997), 대유학당
- 김문자, "가정교육과 부모의 역할에 관한 연구", 청주대학교 대학원 수료논문집, 1(1), pp.255~264 (1994)
- 김영수, "명문가의 자식교육" (2005), 아이필드
- 김익수, "東方의 인륜사회를 지향한 師任堂의 家庭敎育觀", 한국사상과 문화, (47), pp.133~163 (2009), 한국사상문화학회
- 김정희, "부부관계와 자녀교육", 상담과 지도, 43, pp.45~60 (2008)
- 노상우, "Rousseau의 자녀교육관 연구", 교육의 이론과 실천, 13(2), pp.41~61 (2008), 한독교육학회
- 박만구, "자녀교육 지침서에서 제시하고 있는 자녀교육관 및 부모의 역할 탐구", 한국초등교육, 20(1), pp.79~104 (2009), 초등교육연구원[DOI]
- 박진국, "자녀교육을 위한 부모역할에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2003
- 안경식, "우리 조상들의 아이 키우기 : '집안'에서의 유아교육", 생태유아교육연구, 2(1), pp.21~39 (2003), 한국생태유아교육학회
- 오혜진, "유치원아 부모의 사회계층에 따른 자녀교육관에 대한 세대간 비교연구", 석사, pp.2003
- 윤영화, "기독교 가정교육에 관한 고찰", 석사, pp.2008
- 이정희, "율곡의 가정윤리교육에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2008
- 이현지, "「주역」과 행복한 가족론", 동양사회사상, (20), pp.129~154 (2009), 동양사회사상학회
- 이현지, "『주역』과 탈현대 가족 여가의 ‘즐거움’ - 뇌지예雷地豫괘의 즐거움에 대한 도道를 중심으로", 동양사회사상, (21), pp.45~69 (2010), 동양사회사상학회
- 임영택, "기독교 가정과 부모의 역할 유아교육 중심", 석사, pp.2008
- 정미선, "어머니 자녀교육관에 따른 조기 사교육 실태", 석사, pp.2008
- 정재걸, "만두모형의 교육관" (2001), 교육신문사
- 정재걸, "『논어』와 탈근대교육의 설계", 동양사회사상, (14), pp.59~82 (2006), 동양사회사상학회
- 정재걸, "나는 누구인가?-‘唯識 30頌’의 경우", 교육철학, (32), pp.245~274 (2007), 한국교육철학회
- 정재걸, "'산수몽山水夢'괘의 재해석", 동양사회사상, (17), pp.141~172 (2008), 동양사회사상학회
- 정재걸, "산풍고괘山風蠱卦의 교육학적 해석", 동양사회사상, (18), pp.113~135 (2008), 동양사회사상학회
- 최효찬, "세계 명문가의 자녀교육" (2006), 예담
- 홍승표, "깨달음의 사회학" (2002), 예문서원
- 홍승표, "유가 인간관의 탈현대적 함의", 동양사회사상, (13), pp.113~131 (2006), 동양사회사상학회
- 홍승표, "동양철학의 관점에서 본 근대성 비판", 동양철학연구, (52), pp.7~39 (2007), 동양철학연구회
- "휴넷,가정교육 사업 여름 특수 노린다"[URL]
- Barry Neil Kaufman, "아들,일어나다" (2003), 열린
- Beers, G., "가정에서의 영성교육", 상담과 선교, 51, pp.90~106 (2006), 한국상담선교연구원
- Rachel Carson, "센스 오브 원더" (2009), 동서문화사
- Thich Nhat Hanh, "Present moment wonderful moment" (1990), Parallax Press
