구비설화 효자와 불효자에 나타난 인간관계 맺기의 특성과 ‘효자 되기’의 재의미화를 통한 서사 교육 방향 탐색

Abstract

The object of analysis in this study is not a style of discourse on filial piety that emphasizes extreme sacrifices or miraculous deeds, but stories that focus on filial sons and unfilial sons against the background of events that occur in the relationship between fathers and sons within a family. The purpose is to examine the perception of filial and unfilial sons. Rather than stories about filial piety that emphasize extreme sacrifices or miraculous deeds of filial piety, this study selects stories based on everyday events that happen to fathers and sons in the folk world, and focuses on the story of a filial son and an unfilial son. We attempted to select and analyze stories that revealed the characteristics and relationship methods of the son and father in their relationship with each other. Previous studies have mainly focused on filial sons, maintained a critical perspective on society, and revealed their meaning by exposing inhuman ideologies and the reality of social reality. He also talked about the absoluteness of children's absolute filial piety for their parents, and through this, it was clear that a social atmosphere was created that enforced filial piety, even though it was an unreasonable attempt. Therefore, there are implications for understanding what ‘filial piety/unfilial piety’ is defined in an ordinary private family, and furthermore, for the way parents and children form relationships. In the story <Filial Son, Unfilial Son>, there appears a son, who is the subject of filial piety, and a father, who is the object of filial piety. Even though the son, who is unfilial, tries to become a filial son, the father who receives filial piety does not accept the actions of the unfilial son, so in the end, the son cannot become a filial son. Through this appearance, I was able to discover one contradiction. The contradiction is ‘the relativity of filial piety.’ This is something that can be noted not only in filial piety but also in all human relationships. I did it because human relationships are not a matter of being maintained by just one person being good at it. No matter how much an unfilial son acts as a filial son to his father, if the father does not accept the son, or if the father rejects filial piety, the unfilial son cannot become a filial son. In other words, the contradiction in filial piety could be found in the father's attitude. all. Therefore, the relativity of filial piety is related to the father-son relationship, that is, the human relationship Shin Dong-heun discusses / Add a footnote You can capture the fact that it is based on. In this way, in this story, the traditional concept of filial piety is expressed more realistically, so we can not only see what 'filial piety/unfilial piety' is defined in an ordinary private family, but it is also a phenomenon that appears within the realm of parent-child relationships, but it is also a phenomenon that appears in the realm of the relationship between parents and children. You might be able to think more broadly about how to form relationships with others.