스페인어 등위 접속사 변이형 e와 u의 교수-학습에 관한 소고
Some remarks on teaching and learning Spanish coordinate conjunction variants e and u
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The goal of this paper is to make a suggestion to include Spanish conjunction variants e and u in the basic vocabulary list of National Curriculum. RAE-ASALE(2010) describes that the simple coordinate conjunctions can be copulative (y, its variant e, ni), disjunctive (o, its variant u, ni) and adversative (pero, sino, mas). However, all these conjunctions, without exception, are listed as independent lexical items in RAE(2014), where the variants normally are exposed as the sub-content of lexical entries according to the norm. This indicates that if the basic vocabulary list of National Curriculum play a role of the lexical set, it must include both types of conjunctions: unmarked form (y, o) and marked form (i.e.: e, u, ni). Nevertheless, the actual National Curriculum(2015) does not include the two variants e and u in its basic vocabulary list. We insist that National Curriculum must apply an uniform criterion to the lexical registration and the teaching and learning of Spanish conjunction variants should be carried out based on the morpho-phonetic properties of words and the particular syntactic-pragmatic uses in various contexts.
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to make a suggestion to include Spanish conjunction variants e and u in the basic vocabulary list of National Curriculum. RAE-ASALE(2010) describes that the simple coordinate conjunctions can be copulative (y, its variant e, ni), disjunctive (o, its variant u, ni) and adversative (pero, sino, mas). However, all these conjunctions, without exception, are listed as independent lexical items in RAE(2014), where the variants normally are exposed as the sub-content of lexical entries according to the norm. This indicates that if the basic vocabulary list of National Curriculum play a role of the lexical set, it must include both types of conjunctions: unmarked form (y, o) and marked form (i.e.: e, u, ni). Nevertheless, the actual National Curriculum(2015) does not include the two variants e and u in its basic vocabulary list. We insist that National Curriculum must apply an uniform criterion to the lexical registration and the teaching and learning of Spanish conjunction variants should be carried out based on the morpho-phonetic properties of words and the particular syntactic-pragmatic uses in various contexts.
참고문헌 (18)
- "2011", ~
- "2015", ~
- Azofra Sierra, M. E., "Morfosintaxis histórica del español: de la teoría a la práctica" (2009), Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
- Camacho, J., "Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, vol. 2", pp.2635~2694 (1999), Editorial Espasa Calpe, SA
- Company Company, C., "SINTAXIS HISTÓRICA DE LA LENGUA ESPAÑOLA Tercera parte: Adverbios, preposiciones y conjunciones. Relaciones interoracionales, volumen 1", pp.127~244 (2014)
- Fernández Soriano, O., "Two types of impersonal sentences in Spanish: Locative and dative subjects", Syntax, 2(2), pp.101~140 (1999)
- Gómez Torrego, L., "Gramática Didáctica del Español" (1998), SM
- Haiman, J., "Iconicity in Syntax" (1985), John Benjamins
- Instituto Cervantes, "Plan Curricular del Instituto Cervantes: niveles de referencia para el español" (2006), Editorial Biblioteca Nueva, S.L.
- Instituto Cervantes, "Las 500 dudas más frecuentes del español" (2014), Planeta
- Kayne, R., "The Limits of Syntactic Variation", pp.175~217 (2008), John Benjamins
- Mejías-Bikandi, E., "Gradual conventionalization of pragmatic inferences. The y", e and o, International Review of Pragmatics, pp.2019, 11[DOI]
- Nation, I. S. P., "Making and Using Word Lists for Language Learning and Testing" (2016), John Benjamins
- Real Academia Española, "Diccionario panhispánico de dudas" (2005), Santillana Ediciones Generales, S.L.
- Real Academia Española, "Nueva gramática de la lengua española" (2009), Espasa
- Real Academia Española, "Nueva gramática de la lengua española: Manual" (2010), Espasa
- Sweetser, E. E., "From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure" (1990), Cambridge University Press