비엣 탄 응웬의 『동조자』: 베트남 전쟁과 베트남계 남성 주체의 남성성 문제
Viet Thanh Nguyen’s The Sympathizer: Vietnam War and the Issue of Masculinity in Vietnamese Male Subjects
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Viet Thanh Nguyen’s The Sympathizer is often discussed with the hybridized subject represented in/within the American society. However, this paper aims to explore the narrator’s masculinity confined by his general’s overwhelming orders as soldier in America and his ruined nation, Vietnam where he can never recover his masculine power, and the white male-centered American society. However, his masculinity seems to be relocated in a different way in Vietnam among the relationship with a few women. He even dreams of subverting the class stratification between him and the general by dating and ultimately controlling over the general’s daughter, under his masculine power. He, however, proves himself that America does not allow him to fully recover his masculinity, and decides to revolutionize Vietnam because like the general, he believes that the revolution is a possible way to recover his masculinity. Failing to do revolution, the narrator realizes that surviving in American society is much more urgent than establishing masculinity as racial/ethnic other after a long torturing at a military prison.
Abstract
Viet Thanh Nguyen’s The Sympathizer is often discussed with the hybridized subject represented in/within the American society. However, this paper aims to explore the narrator’s masculinity confined by his general’s overwhelming orders as soldier in America and his ruined nation, Vietnam where he can never recover his masculine power, and the white male-centered American society. However, his masculinity seems to be relocated in a different way in Vietnam among the relationship with a few women. He even dreams of subverting the class stratification between him and the general by dating and ultimately controlling over the general’s daughter, under his masculine power. He, however, proves himself that America does not allow him to fully recover his masculinity, and decides to revolutionize Vietnam because like the general, he believes that the revolution is a possible way to recover his masculinity. Failing to do revolution, the narrator realizes that surviving in American society is much more urgent than establishing masculinity as racial/ethnic other after a long torturing at a military prison.
참고문헌 (12)
- Espiritu, Yên Lê, "Toward a Critical Refugee Study: The Vietnamese Refugee Subject in US Scholarship", Journal of Vietnamese Studies, 1(1, pp.2) (2006), 410~433
- Ha, Quan Manh, "When Memory Speaks: Transnational Remembrances in Vietnam War Literature", Southeast Asian Studies, 5(3), pp.463~489 (2016)
- Jack, Smith, "From Both Sides", The Writer, 130(2), pp.32~35 (2017)
- 김민회, "앤드류 팜의 『메기와 만다라』: 불확정에서 확정으로의 여행서사", 새한영어영문학, 62(4), pp.65~84 (2020), 새한영어영문학회[DOI]
- Nguyen, Viet Thanh, "Just Memory: War and the Ethics of Remembrance", American Literary History, 25(1), pp.144~163 (2013)
- Nguyen, Viet Thanh, "Race and Resistance: Literature & Politics in Asian America" (2002), Oxford UP
- Nguyen, Viet Thanh, "The Sympathizer" (2015), Grove
- Shek, Yen Ling, "Asian American Masculinity: A Review of the Literature", Journal of Men’s Studies, 14(3), pp.379~391 (2006)
- Wong, Shawn, "American Knees" (1995), Simon & Schuster
- Wu, Judy Tzu-Chun, "Remembering One Another’s Inhumanity: On Viet Thanh Nguyen’s Vietnam War", Journal of American Studies, 52, pp.237~239 (2018)
