학생의 학습권 보장을 위한 국가 교육권한의 범위와 한계
The boundary and limit of the educational authority of government to protect the right to learn of student
1
조회
0
다운로드
18
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The right to learn is based on the nature of human being to learn and to research the truth. And this is the right to grow and develop the ability as human being and the right to cultural life. And this is the right to true out the principle of national sovereignty. This right to learn of student is guaranteed by the article of the constitution and the constitutional freedom recognized by the principle of constitution as the fundamental right to education. And the right to learn of the citizens is one of the fundamental right and the fundamental right to realize the principle of national sovereignty. Under the public education system in these days, most nations have the duty to guarantee the right to learn of student by constitution and are realizing the educational policy to carry out these duty and to guarantee the right to learn of student. The major theory in the Korea relating to the boundary and limit of the nation's authority for education is that it's included not only the duty to make external environment of education but also the right to decide the contents of education. But there are some problems for the nation to have educational authority to decide not the external environment of education but the contents of education exclusively. Finally, under the public education system in these days, the nation has to arrange the every external environment of education. But it is resonable and right to guarantee the freedom and right to education of school teachers for the right to learn of student the contents of education only. And it is needed to control the outline factors limited boundaries as a necessary condition.
Abstract
The right to learn is based on the nature of human being to learn and to research the truth. And this is the right to grow and develop the ability as human being and the right to cultural life. And this is the right to true out the principle of national sovereignty. This right to learn of student is guaranteed by the article of the constitution and the constitutional freedom recognized by the principle of constitution as the fundamental right to education. And the right to learn of the citizens is one of the fundamental right and the fundamental right to realize the principle of national sovereignty. Under the public education system in these days, most nations have the duty to guarantee the right to learn of student by constitution and are realizing the educational policy to carry out these duty and to guarantee the right to learn of student. The major theory in the Korea relating to the boundary and limit of the nation's authority for education is that it's included not only the duty to make external environment of education but also the right to decide the contents of education. But there are some problems for the nation to have educational authority to decide not the external environment of education but the contents of education exclusively. Finally, under the public education system in these days, the nation has to arrange the every external environment of education. But it is resonable and right to guarantee the freedom and right to education of school teachers for the right to learn of student the contents of education only. And it is needed to control the outline factors limited boundaries as a necessary condition.
참고문헌 (52)
- 강인수, "교육법연구" (1989), 문음사
- 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2008), 법문사
- 김철수, "헌법학개론" (2008), 박영사
- 박재윤, "학교선택권 및 학교참여 문제와 헌법판례", 한국교육법연구, (6.7) (2001), 한국교육법학회
- 박재윤, "학생징계제도와 운영실태", 교육법학연구, (9) (1997), 대한교육법학회
- 성낙인, "부모의 자녀교육에 관한 권리" (1995), 고시계
- 신현직, "교육기본권에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1992
- 양 건, "교육주체상호간의 법적 관계-교육권의 갈등과 그 조정-" (2003), 한국교육개발원
- 이돈희, "교육의 수월성 개념, 교육의 수월성을 지향하는 교육개혁의추진, 현장교육연구운동주제 해설집" (1996), 한국교원단체총연합회
- 표시열, "교육정책과 법" (2002), 박영사
- 표시열, "학생과 교원의 교육권,무엇이 문제이고 어떻게 구현시킬 것인가?", 학생 및 교원의 교육권, 어떻게 보호할 것인가?, 한국교원단체총연합회 정책토론회자료집 (2007)
- 황홍규, "학생사고와 학교?교원 등의 법적 책임", 교육법학연구, (13) (2001), 대한교육법학회
- 대법원, "9.20,95 누 7994,공 1996,3207", ~ (1996)
- 대법원, "11.22.선고 91누2144 판결", ~ (1991)
- 대법원, "7.14.선고 91누4737 판결", ~ (1992)
- 대법원, "1.29.선고 97다1896 판결", ~ (1980)
- 대법원, "1.12.선고 87다카2240 판결", ~ (1988)
- 대법원, "10.30.선고 90도1456 판결", ~ (1990)
- 대법원, "5.28.선고 90다17972 판결", ~ (1991)
- 대법원, "2.27.선고 89다카16178 판결", ~ (1990)
- 헌법재판소, "10.27 선고,89헌마56 결정", 헌법재판소판례집, 1 (1989)
- 헌법재판소, "2.23 선고 91헌마204결정", 헌법재판소판례집, 7(1) (1995)
- 헌법재판소, "3.25 선고,97헌마130결정", 헌법재판소판례집, 11(1) (1999)
- 兼子仁, "? 國民の敎育權" (1971), 岩波新書
- 兼子仁, "敎育判例百選(第3版)" (1998), 有斐閣
- 兼子仁, "敎育法" (1987), 有斐閣
- 堀尾輝久, "敎育と人權" (1977), 岩波書店
- 牧柾名, "敎育を受ける權利を保障する內容と條件, 敎育法學の課題" (1974), 岩波書店
- 相良惟一, "各國の憲法と敎育" (1972), 民主敎育協會
- 相良惟一, "兩親の敎育權の實定法的考察 in 京都大學敎育學部紀要 第8號" (1962)
- 小林植樹, "現代基本權の展開" (1976), 岩波書店
- 小倉庫次, "アメリカ合衆國州憲法の硏究" (1970), 有斐閣
- 室井 力?鈴木英一, "敎育法の基礎" (1978), 靑林書院新社
- 室井修, "子どもの學習權とその制度的保障, 敎育權と學習權(講座敎育法 2)" (1981), エイデル硏究所
- 永井憲一, "敎育を受ける權利, 敎育法の基礎" (1978), 靑林書院新社
- 奧平康弘, "敎育を受ける權利, 憲法III?人權(2)", pp.179~ (1987), 有斐閣
- 伊ケ崎曉生, "敎育の條件整備”とは何か, 公敎育と條件整備の法制", 日本敎育法學會年報, (8) (1979), 有斐閣
- 東京地方裁判所, "昭和49年 7月 16日 判決", ~
- 日本最高裁判所, "昭和51年 5月 21日 判決", ~
- 日本最高裁判所, "昭和63年 7月 15日 判決", ~
- 日本最高裁判所, "昭和51年 5月 21日 判決(學力테스트 判決)", ~
- Antoine Prost, "Histoire de l’enseignement en France 1800-1967, A. Colin", ~
- Conn, Kathlen, "Bullying, Harassment, and Student Threats: Are Schools of the Courts Working Together?", West's Education Law Reporter, 203(1) (2005)
- Figures, "Swedis National Agency for Education, quoted by David Green, Choice in schools benefits the poor, Daily Telegraph, January 20", ~ (2006)
- H. Heckel, "Schulrechtskunde" (2000), Aulf
- J.S.Moskowitz, "Parental Rights and State Education, in 50th Washington젨젨 Law Review" (1975)
- Lants,?Mary A., "Lentz School Security. Thomson West, Cleveland, Ohio. Yell, Mitchell L. and Erik Drasgow, 2005. No Child Left Behind: A Guide for Professions" (2005), Person Education, Inc.
- Louis Fischer, "David Schimmel & Cynthia Kelly" (1999), Teachers and the Law
- T. Paine, "Right of Man, in 人間の權利" (1981), 岩波書店
- Goss v. Lopez, "419U.S.565, 95 S. Ct. 729", ~ (1975)
- Meyer v. Nebraska, "262 U.S. 390, 43 S. Ct. 625", ~ (1923)
- Smith v, "Mount Pleasant Public Schools, 285 F. Supp, 2d 987", ~ (2003)