본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

수소주입시킨 680MPa DP강의 나노인덴터 시험

Nanoindenter Test of 680MPa Dual Phase Steel Charged with Hydrogen

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기계공학

초록

Nanoindentater tests were conducted to conducted nanoindentation microhardness of the individual phaseof ferrite and martensite of 680MPa dual-phase (DP) steel charged with hydrogen. Hydrogen was chargedby electrochemical method with current densities of 150, 200 mA/cm2 for charging times of 5, 10, 25, 50 hours,respectively. Nanoindenter test results showed that the nanoindentation microhardnesses of ferrite phase ofDP steel were varied from min. 1.58 GPa to max. 2.82 GPa, and the nanoindentation microhardnesses ofmartensite phase varied from min. 3.19 GPa to max. 5.16 GPa with the variation of hydrogen charging conditions. It was observed that the variations of the nanoindention microhardnesses of martenstie phase werehigher than those of ferrite phases. It was thought that martensite phase in the 680MPa DP steel was moresensitive than ferrite phase to hydrogen embrittlement.

Abstract

Nanoindentater tests were conducted to conducted nanoindentation microhardness of the individual phaseof ferrite and martensite of 680MPa dual-phase (DP) steel charged with hydrogen. Hydrogen was chargedby electrochemical method with current densities of 150, 200 mA/cm2 for charging times of 5, 10, 25, 50 hours,respectively. Nanoindenter test results showed that the nanoindentation microhardnesses of ferrite phase ofDP steel were varied from min. 1.58 GPa to max. 2.82 GPa, and the nanoindentation microhardnesses ofmartensite phase varied from min. 3.19 GPa to max. 5.16 GPa with the variation of hydrogen charging conditions. It was observed that the variations of the nanoindention microhardnesses of martenstie phase werehigher than those of ferrite phases. It was thought that martensite phase in the 680MPa DP steel was moresensitive than ferrite phase to hydrogen embrittlement.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. H. Hashimoto, , Toyota Tech. Rev, 52, pp.1~ (2002)
  2. M. Sarwar, , J. Mater. Sci, 31, pp.2091~ (1996)
  3. A. Kumar, , Mater. Sci. Eng, 474A, pp.270~ (2008)
  4. S. Sun, , Mater. Sci. Eng, 335A, pp.298~ (2002)
  5. R. G. Davies, , Metall. Mater. Trans, 12A, pp.1667~ (1981)
  6. T. Kushida, , Tetsu-to-Hagane, 82, pp.297~ (1996)
  7. 강계명, "수소주입에 따른 590 MPa급 DP강 표면층의 미소경도와 조직특성", 한국재료학회지, 20(11), pp.581~585 (2010), 한국재료학회
  8. 최종운, "미소경도 측정에 의한 590DP강 Subsurface Zone 내 수소취성 평가", 한국재료학회지, 21(11), pp.581~586 (2011), 한국재료학회
  9. 이철치, "고강도 DP강과 TRIP강의 표면 수소 주입량에 따른 수소취성평가", 한국표면공학회지, 45(3), pp.130~135 (2012), 한국표면공학회
  10. 박재우, "소형펀치시험을 이용한 자동차용 고강도강 수소취성 평가", 한국재료학회지, 22(1), pp.29~34 (2012), 한국재료학회
  11. 강계명, "수소주입시킨 다상조직강의 Subsurface Zone 내 취성화 거동", 한국표면공학회지, 46(1), pp.48~53 (2013), 한국표면공학회
  12. 최종운, "수소장입시킨 590 MPa DP강의 표면층 물성변화에 관한 수소의 영향", 한국표면공학회지, 46(3), pp.126~132 (2013), 한국표면공학회
  13. 최영철, "수소주입된 고강도 DP 박강판의 소형펀치시험결과 분석", 한국표면공학회지, 46(5), pp.229~233 (2013), 한국표면공학회
  14. W. C. Oliver, , J. Mater. Res, 71564 (1992)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)