17 世紀朝鮮的經學和經世學

Abstract

First, It seems that Cheong Ku adopted Yulgok School`s philosophy, even though he belonged to T`oegye School. Second, Cheong Ku`s viewpoint that the royal rituals should be differentiated from those of literaties, was not derived from T`oegye but established by Cheong Ku himself. Third, Cheong Ku`s social thought was limited to the level of the manage improvement of tax system. Fourth, Heo Mok`s Study on Confucian Classics was in the boundary of Ch`ushi`s Confucianism, and we tried to reconcile T`oegye`s philosophy with that of Yulgok. Fifth, Heo Mok`s theory of Confucian rituals seems to have paid more attention to royal prestige, but it was not linked to the strengthening of royal power. Sixth, Heo Mok`s social thought was limited to the level of the manage improvement of tax system. Moreover, his view on the status system was very conservative. Seventh, Kim Chang-Saeng, supported his teacher, Yulgok`s philosophy. Eighth, Kim Chang-Saeng thought that the royal rituals should be differentiated from those of literati. Ninth, Kim Chang-Saeng supported the Household Cloth Tax. In this respect he was more progressive than Cheong Ku and Heo Mok. Tenth, Song Shi-Yeol that Yulgok, Kim Chang-Saeng and himself were the orthodox successors of Confucianism. Eleventh, Song Shi-Yeol revised Yulgok`s philosophy partly, even though Song Shi-yeol mainly supported Yulgok`s philosophy. Twelfth, Song Shi-Yeol thought that the royal rituals should be the same as those of literai. In this respect he was s different from his teacher, Kim Chang-Saeng. Thirteenth, Song Shi-Yeol supported not only Household Cloth Tax but also Tae-dong Act (to change corvee to rice tax).