17 世紀韓國的儒學思想 ──朱子學的深化以及對其的批判
The Korean Confucianism in 17C ─Deepening Zhuzixue and Criticism about It
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Korean Neo-Confucianism in 17C was deepened by both Toegye`s and Yoolgog`s schools, and anther school, which compromised the theories between two schools, appeared. They tried to explain the mind and nature of Man with li-qi theory. In this process they were concerned about the relation between Man`s and Thing`s nature, that is “Is it the same or different mutually？ On the other side, Zhuxi`s commentation of the Confucian scriptures was absolutely reverenced, so the different commentation about Zhuxi`s could never be approved. In such an atmosphere, Baegho and Seogye unfolded anti-Zhuxi`s commentation. This current of Korean confucianism in 17C has a meaning as below. First, it became a background of the Practical Learning in the latter Chosun dynasty. Especially it concerned with an Eclectic School of Korean Neo-Confucianism in 17C. Second, the survey of Man`s and Thing`s nature in this period made a way for Ho-Rag Debate, which was the most important theme in 18C`s Korean Neo-Confucianism. Third, anti-Zhuxi`s commentation of the Confucian scriptures took Yangming school out of a shady spot.
Abstract
The Korean Neo-Confucianism in 17C was deepened by both Toegye`s and Yoolgog`s schools, and anther school, which compromised the theories between two schools, appeared. They tried to explain the mind and nature of Man with li-qi theory. In this process they were concerned about the relation between Man`s and Thing`s nature, that is “Is it the same or different mutually？ On the other side, Zhuxi`s commentation of the Confucian scriptures was absolutely reverenced, so the different commentation about Zhuxi`s could never be approved. In such an atmosphere, Baegho and Seogye unfolded anti-Zhuxi`s commentation. This current of Korean confucianism in 17C has a meaning as below. First, it became a background of the Practical Learning in the latter Chosun dynasty. Especially it concerned with an Eclectic School of Korean Neo-Confucianism in 17C. Second, the survey of Man`s and Thing`s nature in this period made a way for Ho-Rag Debate, which was the most important theme in 18C`s Korean Neo-Confucianism. Third, anti-Zhuxi`s commentation of the Confucian scriptures took Yangming school out of a shady spot.