본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

CoP 활성화를 통한 지식경영 - 아이쿱생협의 인트라넷 활용사례-

CoP Lead Knowledge Management - A Case of iCOOP Consumers' Co-operative -

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

This paper aims to describe how knowledge management could be put into practice in a voluntary way. From a practice-based standpoint, this study focused closely on the linkage between knowledge and practice. It is because knowledge management could fail if not put into practice. Using its own information system, iCOOP, a federation of consumers' co-operatives in Korea has been practised successful knowledge management voluntarily with its members. Based on the exploratory case study on iCOOP, this study conducted focused interviews with 5 member co-operatives of iCOOP. Main findings are as follows. First, an NoP emerges within a corporate information system when corporate work processes are concentrated in the information system. Second, corporate information system facilitates CoPs and the NoP when its information and information about its users are opened to all of the information system users. In conclusion, this study points out that it is not the matter of primary importance to build a knowledge management system. Rather, practice has the key to the successful knowledge management.

Abstract

This paper aims to describe how knowledge management could be put into practice in a voluntary way. From a practice-based standpoint, this study focused closely on the linkage between knowledge and practice. It is because knowledge management could fail if not put into practice. Using its own information system, iCOOP, a federation of consumers' co-operatives in Korea has been practised successful knowledge management voluntarily with its members. Based on the exploratory case study on iCOOP, this study conducted focused interviews with 5 member co-operatives of iCOOP. Main findings are as follows. First, an NoP emerges within a corporate information system when corporate work processes are concentrated in the information system. Second, corporate information system facilitates CoPs and the NoP when its information and information about its users are opened to all of the information system users. In conclusion, this study points out that it is not the matter of primary importance to build a knowledge management system. Rather, practice has the key to the successful knowledge management.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. 고준, "온라인 실행공동체(Communities-of-Practice) 활성화 요인과 스폰서의 영향", Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), pp.183~205 (2006), 한국경영정보학회
  2. 김동헌, "CoP 활동이 사회적 자본과 조직성과에 미치는 영향 : 유한킴벌리, 포스코, 건강보험심사원 사례를 중심으로", 지식경영연구, 11(3), pp.77~90 (2010), 한국지식경영학회
  3. 백윤정, "실행공동체(CoP)내 지식공유의 영향요인: 구조적 특성과 관계적 특성의 조절효과를 중심으로", 지식경영연구, 9(2), pp.63~86 (2008), 한국지식경영학회
  4. 방유성, "성공적 지식경영을 위한CoP 운영전략: S사의 지식경영구축 사례를 중심으로", 지식경영연구, 1(1), pp.127~137 (2000)
  5. 현경택, "기업의 지식경영 실행에 관한 질적 연구 : S기업의 지식경영 실천 사례", 지식경영연구, 11(1), pp.129~146 (2010), 한국지식경영학회
  6. Adler, P. S., "Professional Work: The Emergence of CollaborativeCommunity", Organization Science, 19(2), pp.359~376 (2008)
  7. Agterberg, M., "Keeping the WheelsTurning: The Dynamics of Managing Networks ofPractice", Journal of Management Studies, 47(1), pp.85~108 (2010)
  8. Blackler, F., "Knowledge, Knowledge Workand Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation", Organization Studies, 16(6), pp.1021~1046 (1995)
  9. Brown, J. S., "OrganizationalLearning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward aUnified View of Working, Learning, and InnovationJohn", Organization Science, 2(1), pp.40~57 (1991)
  10. Brown, J. S., "Knowledge andOrganization: A Social-Practice Perspective", Organization Science, 12(2), pp.198~213 (2001)
  11. Dalkir, K., "Knowledge Management inTheory and Practice" (2005), Elsevier
  12. Davenport, T. H., "WorkingKnowledge" (1998), Harvard Business Review Press
  13. DeSanctis, G., "CommunicationProcesses for Virtual Organizations", Journal ofComputer-Mediated Communication, 3(4) (1998)
  14. Edenius, M., "To manageknowledge by intranet", Journal of KnowledgeManagement, 7(5), pp.124~136 (2003)
  15. Fahey, L., "The ElevenDeadliest Sins of knowledge Management", CaliforniaManagement Review, 40(3), pp.265~276 (1998)
  16. Feldman, M. S., "Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a sourceof flexibility and change", Administrative ScienceQuarterly, 48(1), pp.94~118 (2003)
  17. Gonzalez, J. S., "The 21st-century Intranet" (1998), Prentice-Hall, Inc
  18. Gupta, A. K., "Knowledge flows within multinational corporations", Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), pp.473~496 (2000)
  19. Jacko, J. A., "Intranets and Organizational Learning: A Researchand Development Agenda", International Journal ofHuman-computer Interaction, 14(1), pp.93~130 (2001)
  20. Ji, Y. G., "A Framework forImproving Organizational Learning Through aUser-Adaptive Intranet Portal Organizational MemoryInformation System", International Journal ofAviation Psychology, 11(2), pp.123~148 (2001)
  21. Johnson, G., "Strategy as practice: Research directionsand resources" (2007), Cambridge University Press
  22. Krogh, G. von., "Care in knowledge creation", California Management Review, 40(3), pp.133~153 (1998)
  23. Lave, J., "Situated learning:Legitimate peripheral participation, In Learning in doing (Vol. 95)", pp.138~ (1991), Cambridge University Press
  24. Liebowitz, J., "KnowledgeOrganizations: What Every Manager Should Know", pp.208~ (1998), Taylor & Francis
  25. Lin, H. -F., "Perceptions ofsenior managers toward knowledge-sharing behaviour", Management Decision, 42(1), pp.108~125 (2004)
  26. Merton, R. K., "TheFocused Interview", American Journal of Sociology, 51(6), pp.541~557 (1946)
  27. Nelson, K. M., "Thecontribution of shared knowledge to IS groupperformance", MIS Quarterly, pp.409~432 (1996)
  28. Pfeffer, J., "The knowing-doinggap: How smart companies turn knowledge intoaction" (1999), Harvard Business Press
  29. Preece, J., "TheReader-to-Leader Framework: MotivatingTechnology-Mediated Social Participation", Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(1), pp.14~33 (2009)
  30. Stenmark, D., "Information vs. Knowledge:The Role of intranets in Knowledge Management", 35th Hawaii International Conference on SystemSciences (2002)
  31. Spender, J. C., "Organizational knowledge,learning and memory: three concepts in search of atheory", Journal of Organizational ChangeManagement, 9(1), pp.63~78 (1996)
  32. Takhteyev, Y., "NETWORKS OF PRACTICEAS HETEROGENEOUS ACTOR- NETWORKS.Information", Communication & Society, 12(4), pp.566~583 (2009)
  33. Tsai, W., "Social capital andvalue creation: The role of intrafirm networks", Academy of management Journal, 41(4), pp.464~476 (1998)
  34. Wasko, M. M., "Why Should IShare? Examining Social Capital and KnowledgeContribution in Electronic Networks of Practice", MISQuarterly, 29(1), pp.35~57 (2005)
  35. Wasko, M. M., "Collective Action and Knowledge Contribution inElectronic Networks of Practice", Journal of theAssociation for Information Systems, 5(11-12), pp.493~513 (2004)
  36. Wenger, E. C., "Communities of Practice andSocial Learning Systems", Organization, 7(2), pp.225~246 (2000)
  37. Yin, R. K., "Case Study Research: Designand Methods. Essential guide to qualitative methodsin organizational research" (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)