본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

开放商品房住宅小区的法律思考

Legal Consideration on Opening Commodity Residential Quarter

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

商品房住宅小区是我国城镇住房供应体系的重要组成部分. 大规模、封闭式的设计理念和建造模式给商品房住宅小区埋下法律隐患:共有权行使难、大修基金缺口大、地下管网更新改造无人埋单等,这些问题的大量存在,使商品房住宅小区成为开放小区的发展趋势下法律关系最难处理的小区类型. 开放小区一方面为以上问题的解决提供了契机,但另一方面开放住宅小区本身又关乎居民的切身利益和相关法律权利,是个不容小觑的问题. 在不违背《物权法》等法律法规,保证业主私有财产不被侵犯的前提下,采用“出租”、“自主营运开放”或“附条件赠与”的方式开放小区的特定共有区域,既能实现“逐步打开小区”的政策倡导,又不必大费周折进行立法修法. 商品房住宅小区内部公共区域的土地权属状态以及小区模式下可分割的建筑物区分所有权格局,为分片块开放小区特定部分提供了可能. 但“出租”、“自主营运开放”或“附条件赠与”等可行开放方式的实施都必须建立在业主意思自治的基础上. 在业主维权意识和能力都逐渐增强的趋势和法治环境下,这些方式的推行需要政府在前期宣传和引导上的软干预.

Abstract

Commodity residential district is an important part of China's urban housing supply system. The large scale and closed design concept and construction mode has planted latent legal risks on commodity residential quarter as follows: the difficulty in exercising the condominiums rights, the huge gap of fund for major overhaul, no payment is made for the upkeep of underground pipeline and so on. The opening residential quarter can provide an opportunity for the solution of the above problems, but the specific operative mode is indeed a problem because it involving the vital interests of the residents which does not allow to belittle. Under the premise of not contrary to the existing laws and regulations and ensure that the owners of private property is not violated, adopting certain feasible approach such as the “rental”, “self-operating” or “conditional dotation” to open the commodity residential quarter not only can realize the “gradually opening of district” policy advocacy, but can also avoid going through the trouble of legislation and relevant amendments. The separability feature of the condominium ownership of public land in Commodity residential district has provides the possibility for opening the district. Feasible approaches such as “rental”, “self-operating” or “conditional dotation”, however, must be established on the basis of the owner's autonomy. Under the rule of law and in the trends of the owners' awareness and capacity of law enhanced, the implementation of these approaches require government propaganda and some soft interventions.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. 王泽鉴, "民法物权(第一册)" (2001), 中国政法大学出版社
  2. 陈华彬, "建筑物区分所有权研究" (2007), 法律出版社
  3. 姜浩峰, "围墙拆了, 狼就来了?", 新民周刊 第9期, ~ (2016)
  4. 高艳萍, "浅议建筑物共有部分", 山西师大学报(社会科学版), (1) (2009)
  5. 刘潇濛, "城市住宅小区地下管网的财产权研究", 硕士, pp.2012
  6. 王景烁, "高龄’电梯 谁来埋单", 日文摘周报, ~ (2016)
  7. 王彦辉, "中国城市封闭住区的现状问题及其对策研究", 现代城市研究, (3) (2010)
  8. 郑晓玲, "浅议《物权法》之建筑物区分所有权", 云南财贸学院学报(社会科学版), (6) (2008)
  9. 青木, "德国地下管线一次建好", 中华建设, (4) (2005)
  10. "中国为何建那么多封闭式小区?不只因为安全"[URL]
  11. "老旧小区地下水管网改造, 费用该谁出?"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)