본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선시대 문집 편찬의 역사적 특징과 문집 체제

The Historical Characteristics of Editing Munjip and its Organization

1

조회

0

다운로드

19

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

A Munjip, a collection of literary works, includes not only author’s life and the thought, but also the atmosphere of the times that the author belongs to. That is why we should treat them significantly not only in researching of the author’s individual thought, career and literature, but also of politics, thoughts and the view of literature at that times. There are various kinds of organization of Munjip. In most cases it divides the whole works into poetry and prose and lines up poetry in chronological order and classifies prose by the style of writing. There are of course some exceptional cases for certain reasons. And in many cases supplement was added, say a chronological list of author's life, related works of his fellows, and criticism of descendants etc. The styles in Munjip changes according to the demands of the times and historical backgrounds. For example 15 pieces of Jesa in the 15 volume of Gyewon-pilgyeong-jip reveal the aspect of taoism of Tang dynasty. These works created new traditions of composing Jesa among literati in Song and Goryeo period. There are some cases that Munjip in Joseon period establishes separately the style of Sangryangmun(a writing for the ceremony of putting up the ridge beam). It was the result of influence from China on one hand, and of the change of domestic situation that the ceremony was prevalent for social cohesion under official recognition on the other. Editors of Munjip aims to collect the author’s whole works. However, not a few works are omitted as there’s also a tendency to select certain works under a certain editorial intention. In most cases it is due to (a) the contradiction between the intention of collecting the whole works and of keeping a certain editorial intention (b) the limit of information caused by classification of style (c) the question of Korean style Hanmun. There are also lots of cases that Munjip doesn’t remain or remain incomplete because of political reasons. We need to collect the related literature and to establish open text with chronological order.

Abstract

A Munjip, a collection of literary works, includes not only author’s life and the thought, but also the atmosphere of the times that the author belongs to. That is why we should treat them significantly not only in researching of the author’s individual thought, career and literature, but also of politics, thoughts and the view of literature at that times. There are various kinds of organization of Munjip. In most cases it divides the whole works into poetry and prose and lines up poetry in chronological order and classifies prose by the style of writing. There are of course some exceptional cases for certain reasons. And in many cases supplement was added, say a chronological list of author's life, related works of his fellows, and criticism of descendants etc. The styles in Munjip changes according to the demands of the times and historical backgrounds. For example 15 pieces of Jesa in the 15 volume of Gyewon-pilgyeong-jip reveal the aspect of taoism of Tang dynasty. These works created new traditions of composing Jesa among literati in Song and Goryeo period. There are some cases that Munjip in Joseon period establishes separately the style of Sangryangmun(a writing for the ceremony of putting up the ridge beam). It was the result of influence from China on one hand, and of the change of domestic situation that the ceremony was prevalent for social cohesion under official recognition on the other. Editors of Munjip aims to collect the author’s whole works. However, not a few works are omitted as there’s also a tendency to select certain works under a certain editorial intention. In most cases it is due to (a) the contradiction between the intention of collecting the whole works and of keeping a certain editorial intention (b) the limit of information caused by classification of style (c) the question of Korean style Hanmun. There are also lots of cases that Munjip doesn’t remain or remain incomplete because of political reasons. We need to collect the related literature and to establish open text with chronological order.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 金宗直, "佔畢齋集" (1988)
  2. 徐有榘, "鏤板考" (1941), 大同出版社
  3. 李奎報, "東國李相國集" (1988)
  4. 李德壽, "西堂私載" (1997)
  5. 李命培, "茅溪先生文集" (2008)
  6. 李時恒, "和隱集" (2008)
  7. 李楨國, "尤園先生文集" (2010)
  8. 李宗城, "梧川先生集" (1998)
  9. 張維, "谿谷集" (1988)
  10. 鄭經世, "愚伏集" (1988)
  11. 鄭道傳, "三峰集" (1988)
  12. 正祖, "弘齋全書" (2001)
  13. 崔致遠, "桂苑筆耕集" (1988)
  14. 許穆, "眉叟記言" (1988)
  15. "高宗實錄" (1970), 국사편찬위원회
  16. "舊唐書" (1991), 中華書局
  17. 민족문화추진회, "국역동문선" (1968), 민족문화추진회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)