챗GPT의 아이러니 번역 활용 가능성 고찰
A Study of Translatability of Irony in ChatGPT
0
조회
0
다운로드
29
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The advent of ChatGPT is making waves in various fields. The interactive AI can perform tasks commonly connected with human cognitive activities including playing games, analyzing medical data, and summarizing texts. In particular, the creativity of ChatGPT, which allows it to draw a painting or write a song, is a starting point for this study because translation is considered to be a creative work. Therefore, this study begins with the question of whether ChatGPT can translate a literary work, especially irony. Among the literary devices, irony is particularly difficult to translate because it requires a high level of complex perception and interpretation. Another reason why irony translation is difficult is that translators have difficulty choosing a translation strategy between the following two options: to literally translate irony to give readers a chance to find it, or to paraphrase irony to convey the intention of a writer. Until now, machine translation has had many difficulties not only in identifying irony, but also in translating it with an appropriate strategy. Therefore, this study aims to examine if ChatGPT can be utilized to translate irony. To answer the research question, we follow two processes. First, we take a source text and its target texts from human translation, machine translation using Google, and AI translation using ChatGPT, and then analyze them. The results show that ChatGPT understands and translates the meaning and intent of the source text more deeply than existing machine translation, even though the results were not as complete as the human translation. Secondly, we provide the AI with some information at the word, sentence, and context level so that it can understand cultural elements and contexts that include irony. In some cases, even when ChatGPT gets a clue, it does not understand or reflect the writer’s intention. However, it does actively utilize the provided information and the translation quality does improve. Therefore, our conclusion is three-fold. First, machine translation and AI translation can be used in different ways. Second, the interactive character of AI can be helpful to improve translation quality. And lastly, AI translation can be utilized to translate irony.
Abstract
The advent of ChatGPT is making waves in various fields. The interactive AI can perform tasks commonly connected with human cognitive activities including playing games, analyzing medical data, and summarizing texts. In particular, the creativity of ChatGPT, which allows it to draw a painting or write a song, is a starting point for this study because translation is considered to be a creative work. Therefore, this study begins with the question of whether ChatGPT can translate a literary work, especially irony. Among the literary devices, irony is particularly difficult to translate because it requires a high level of complex perception and interpretation. Another reason why irony translation is difficult is that translators have difficulty choosing a translation strategy between the following two options: to literally translate irony to give readers a chance to find it, or to paraphrase irony to convey the intention of a writer. Until now, machine translation has had many difficulties not only in identifying irony, but also in translating it with an appropriate strategy. Therefore, this study aims to examine if ChatGPT can be utilized to translate irony. To answer the research question, we follow two processes. First, we take a source text and its target texts from human translation, machine translation using Google, and AI translation using ChatGPT, and then analyze them. The results show that ChatGPT understands and translates the meaning and intent of the source text more deeply than existing machine translation, even though the results were not as complete as the human translation. Secondly, we provide the AI with some information at the word, sentence, and context level so that it can understand cultural elements and contexts that include irony. In some cases, even when ChatGPT gets a clue, it does not understand or reflect the writer’s intention. However, it does actively utilize the provided information and the translation quality does improve. Therefore, our conclusion is three-fold. First, machine translation and AI translation can be used in different ways. Second, the interactive character of AI can be helpful to improve translation quality. And lastly, AI translation can be utilized to translate irony.
참고문헌 (26)
- 김영희, "로버트 프로스트와 T. S. 엘리엇의 크리스마스 트리-인간번역과 기계번역 차이연구", T. S. 엘리엇연구, 31(1), pp.1~21 (2021), 한국T.S.엘리엇학회
- 김진, "소설 『꽃신』의 인간번역과 기계번역 비교 연구", 석사, pp.2020
- 김혜경, "역번역을 통한 기계번역의 한계와 발전 가능성 제고: 『채식주의자』를 중심으로", 동화와 번역, (37), pp.13~37 (2019), 동화와번역연구소
- 나병철, "구어체 소설과 또다른 근대의 기원", 비평문학, 12, pp.196~225 (1998)
- 마승혜, "문학작품 기계번역의 한계에 대한 상세 고찰", 통번역학연구, 22(3), pp.65~88 (2018), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 송연석, "기계번역 담론에 대한 비판적 고찰", 번역학연구, 19(1), pp.119~145 (2018), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 이동환, "기계번역 이후의 영미문학교육: 번역연구의 성과와 영미문학교육의 미래", 영미문학교육, 21(2), pp.221~249 (2017), 한국영미문학교육학회[DOI]
- 이준호, "문학번역 적용을 위한 기계번역의 현주소", 통번역학연구, 23(1), pp.143~167 (2019), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 이창수, "기계학습 알고리즘을 활용한 문학번역에서의 기계 번역과 인간 번역 결과물 분류 연구", 번역학연구, 22(1), pp.199~217 (2021), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 전혜진, "AI 시대, 문학번역에서 기계번역과 인간번역 비교분석 연구 - 똘스또이의 『유년시절』번역 분석을 중심으로", 노어노문학, 31(1), pp.111~154 (2019), 한국노어노문학회
- 채만식, "하서명작선: 레이메이드 인생" (2004), 하서
- 채만식, "태평천하" (2006), 창비
- 최윤영, "기계번역과 문학번역", 번역연구, 4, pp.51~61 (1996)
- 한미애, "서술의 다양성을 번역하기 —『부랑일기』를 중심으로", 번역학연구, 12(1), pp.263~283 (2011), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 한미애, "채만식의 풍자소설에 나타난 아이러니 번역 양상 - 「치숙」과 『태평천하』의 영역본을 중심으로", 번역학연구, 16(5), pp.183~211 (2015), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 홍승연, "학부 문화번역 수업에서 기계번역을 활용한 교육방안 모색", 영미연구, 56, pp.189~214 (2022), 영미연구소
- Chun, Kyung-Ja, "Peace Under Heaven" (1993), M.E. Sharpe
- Fulton, Bruce, "My Innocent Uncle" (2005), Columbia UP
- Hatim, Basin, "Discourse and the Translator" (1990), Longman
- Kamyanets, Angela, "Translating Irony in Media Texts : A Relevance Theory Perspective", Across Languages and Cultures, 18(2), pp.261~278 (2017)
- Moneva, Ángeles Ruiz, "Searching for Some Relevance Answers to the Problems Raised by the Translation of Irony", Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 14, pp.213~247 (2001)
- Muecke, Douglas Colin, "Irony" (1970), Methuen
- Wilson, Deirdre, "Meaning and Relevance, New" (2012), Cambridge UP
- "GPT-3 모델을 사용한 소설 쓰기를 주제로 한 연구" (2023)[URL]
- "GPT-3.5"[URL]
- "GPT-4"[URL]
