본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

검사와 사법경찰의 의사소통 시스템 구축 방안

Measures for Establishment of Communication System between Public Prosecutor and Police

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

For resolution of conflicts and harmonious communication between public prosecutor and police, it is necessary to recognize the fact that both agencies have a common goal and act in a mutual dependent manner. The common goal between public prosecutor and police is “to reveal the substantive truth of crimes and to make criminals receive criminal sanctions accordingly with their responsibilities”. From the position of police, it is necessary to recognize and accept the fact that ① public prosecutor, as a prosecution agency and at the same time an investigative agency, has authority to control police in relation to investigate crimes in accordance with the Constitution and the Criminal Procedure Act, and ② a prosecutor has expertise in law as a judicial officer and is suitable for investigating legally complicated cases. From the position of public prosecutor, on the other hand, it is necessary to honestly recognize the fact that police is an indispensable agency in that ① police investigates more than 80% of actual cases, and ② police has not only abundant human and material resources in relation to investigations but also easily collect criminal information by closely contacting the people. One-sided authority or capability is not sufficient to achieve the common goal without mutual cooperation. Eventually, those conflicts between public prosecutor and police must be resolved from the view of respecting the position of the citizen. They have been disappointed with the “power struggle” of the both agencies. Thus, it is necessary to find a solution with a focus on which investigation system and operation of investigation practice minimize the violation of human rights and at the same time are helpful in ensuring social security.

Abstract

For resolution of conflicts and harmonious communication between public prosecutor and police, it is necessary to recognize the fact that both agencies have a common goal and act in a mutual dependent manner. The common goal between public prosecutor and police is “to reveal the substantive truth of crimes and to make criminals receive criminal sanctions accordingly with their responsibilities”. From the position of police, it is necessary to recognize and accept the fact that ① public prosecutor, as a prosecution agency and at the same time an investigative agency, has authority to control police in relation to investigate crimes in accordance with the Constitution and the Criminal Procedure Act, and ② a prosecutor has expertise in law as a judicial officer and is suitable for investigating legally complicated cases. From the position of public prosecutor, on the other hand, it is necessary to honestly recognize the fact that police is an indispensable agency in that ① police investigates more than 80% of actual cases, and ② police has not only abundant human and material resources in relation to investigations but also easily collect criminal information by closely contacting the people. One-sided authority or capability is not sufficient to achieve the common goal without mutual cooperation. Eventually, those conflicts between public prosecutor and police must be resolved from the view of respecting the position of the citizen. They have been disappointed with the “power struggle” of the both agencies. Thus, it is necessary to find a solution with a focus on which investigation system and operation of investigation practice minimize the violation of human rights and at the same time are helpful in ensuring social security.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 수사경찰의 의식에 관한 연구, "김상희", ~ (1996)
  2. 김종구, "검찰제도론" (2011), 법문사
  3. 박창호, "비교수사제도론" (2004), 博英社
  4. 사법연수원, "수사절차론" (2010), 사법연수원편집부
  5. 손동권, "형사소송법" (2008), 세창출판사
  6. 정병대, "수사구조에 관한 연구" (2007), 법무연수원
  7. 정성진, "법치와 자유" (2010), 박영사
  8. 정웅석, "수사지휘에 관한 연구" (2011), 大明出版社
  9. 하지현, "소통의 기술" (2011), 미루나무
  10. David T. Johnson, "アメリカ人のみた日本の檢察制度" (2004), Springer
  11. Robert B. Cialdini, "설득의 기술" (2009), 21세기북스
  12. 김윤상, "수사지휘권과 인권보장", 형사정책, 15(1), pp.15~35 (2003), 한국형사정책학회
  13. 김재민, "주요 국가의 수사체제에 관한 고찰 : 영국ㆍ미국ㆍ독일ㆍ프랑스ㆍ일본의 수사체제를 중심으로", 경찰학연구, (3), pp.143~170 (2002), 경찰대학
  14. 박노섭, "수사절차의 의미변화와 실무상에서의 독일수사경찰과 검찰", 치안정책연구, (17), pp.217~221 (2003), 치안정책연구소
  15. 박창호, "프랑스 수사제도 : 경찰을 중심으로", 치안정책연구, (16), pp.245~287 (2002), 안정책연구소
  16. 안성수, "인권보호와 검사의 수사지휘권", 법조, 55(6), pp.19~50 (2006), 법조협회
  17. 이정수, "수사경찰의 의식에 관한 연구", 형사정책연구, 2(1), pp.37~72 (1991), 한국형사정책연구원
  18. 임준태, "효율적 범죄대책을 위한 바람직한 검찰·경찰관계 구상-독일경찰과 검찰의 상호협력적 관계를 중심으로-", 한국공안행정학회보, (16), pp.131~178 (2003), 한국공안행정학회
  19. 조국, "현 시기 검찰?경찰 수사권조정의 원칙과 방향―형사소송법 제195조, 제196조의 개정을 중심으로―", 서울대학교 법학, 46(4), pp.219~241 (2005), 법학연구소
  20. 조상제, "프랑스 형사사법제도 : 형사법원의 구조와 검찰제도를 중심으로", 비교형사법연구, 3(1), pp.421~450 (2001), 한국비교형사법학회
  21. 최선우, "일본의 수사에 있어서 경찰관과 검찰관의 관계", 치안정책연구, (11), pp.83~89 (1999), 치안정책 연구소
  22. 법무부, "사법경찰관과 사법관" (2001)
  23. 법무연수원, "검찰실무1" (2010), 법무연수원
  24. 법무연수원, "수사지휘론" (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)