본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

컴퓨터 지원 협력학습을 위한 조정지원도구의 개발 및 효과성 분석

Analysis on Effectiveness of Coordination Supporting Tool in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

컴퓨터 지원 협력학습(Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 이하 CSCL)은 학습 참여자간 상호작용을 촉진하고 집단차원의 성과를 높이기 위하여 협력적 탐구활동이 잘 일어나도록 하는 데에 초점을 두고 있다. CSCL의 중요한 목적 중 하나는 이러한 협력활동을 통해서 학습자 개개인의 학습 뿐 아니라 집단에 속한 학습자 공동의 지적결과를 만들어내는데 있다.본 연구에서는 CSCL(컴퓨터 지원 협력학습)을 위한 조정 지원도구를 개발한 후, 이를 현장에 적용하여 효과성을 검증하였다. 이를 위하여 협력학습의 조정활동을 지원하기 위한 원리를 도출하여 조정지원도구를 개발하였다. 개발 된 조정지원도구를 CSCL 환경에 적용하여 그 효과성을 검증한 결과, 조정지원도구는 협력적 탐구활동 참여자간 메시지 상호작용에서 유용한 효과가 있는 것으로 분석되었다(χ2 = 15.28, p=.009). 학습결과의 측정을 위한 포트폴리오 평가에 있어서도 조정지원도구는 긍정적인 효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다(t(62)=5.60, p=.000). 본 연구를 통해서 개발 된 조정지원도구는 현장 적용을 통해서 지속적인 정련과정을 거쳐야 할 것으로 생각된다. 본 연구는 조정지원도구가 CSCL에서 중요한 설계와 실행의 한 영역으로서 정립되고 운영될 수 있다는 기반을 마련했다는 점에서 의의가 있다고 할 수 있다.

Abstract

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning(CSCL) has been focusing on how to facilitate interaction between individual learners and improve performance in group level. One of the important purposes of CSCL is to produce common learning result through collaboration of learners in group. In addition to that, supporting collaborative problem-solving process should be needed to make collaborative inquiry activity successful. Learners could face up diverse challenges in the course of collaborative problem- solving, so that interaction between peer learners is getting important. The results of this research are as follows: coordination supporting tool enhances quality of learning activity to make interaction between learners more active. This findings is based on the χ2 analysis (χ2 = 15.28, p=.009). Especially coordination supporting tool has positive impact on learning goal-sharing between learners. Coordination supporting tool could provide space and function for interaction between learners. It also means that coordination supporting tool could play an important role in defining whole learning task process. Coordination supporting tool positively affects learning results. Portfolio result which is an output of collaborative learning in group with coordination supporting tool show positive impact(t(62)=5.60, p=.000). It implies that coordination support for portfolio could cause positive result in terms of division of labor, direction definition, learning goal-sharing.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. 이인숙, "e-Learning 환경에서의 자기조절학습전략, 자기효능감과 e-Learning 학습 전략 수준 및 학업성취도 관련성 규명", 교육공학연구, 19(3), pp.41~68 (2003)
  2. 장혜정, "탐구기반학습에서 성찰적 탐구 지원도구의 설계연구", 교육공학연구, 22(2), pp.27~67 (2006), 한국교육공학회
  3. 하동환, "사진전문가 교육을 위한 이중편구조의 효과", 박사, pp.2005
  4. 한정선, "협력적 지식창출 과정의 규명: 활동이론을 통한 e-Learning 설계안 작성활동의 분석", 교육공학연구, 21(1), pp.29~62 (2005)
  5. Barron,B., "Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups", The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 9(4), pp.403~436 (2000)
  6. Bielaczyc,K., "Designing social infrastructure: The challenge of building computer-supported learning communities. In Dillenbourg, P., Eurelings, A. & Hakkarainen, K.(Eds.),European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning. The Proceedings of the First Euroupean Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning", ~ (2001)
  7. Cannon-Bowers,J., "Reflection on shared cognition", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, pp.195~202 (2001)
  8. Crowston,K., "Coordination and collective mind in software requirements development", IBM systems Journal, 37(2), pp.227~245 (1998)
  9. Dillenbourg,P., "Sharing solutions: persistence and grounding in multimodal collaborative problem solving", Journal of Learning Sciences, 15(1), pp.121~151 (2006)
  10. Edelson,D., "Design research: what we learn when we engage in design", The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), pp.105~121 (2002)
  11. Engestr,Y., "Innovative learning in work teams: analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice In : Perspectives on Activity Theory", pp.377~404 (1999), Cambridge University
  12. Halloran, J., "Taking the 'no' out of notes: activity theory, groupware, and student group work, In G. Stahl(Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: foundations for a CSCL community, proceedings of CSCL 2002 (pp.179-188) Boulder, CL, Jan. 7-11, 2002", ~ (2002)
  13. Hedestig,U., "Re-contextualization of teaching and learning in videoconferece- based environments: an empirical Study. In G. Stahl(Ed.) Computer support for collaborative learning: foundations for CSCL community, proceedings of CSCL 2002 , Boulder, CL, 179-188", ~ (2002)
  14. Kaptelinin, V., "Individual and collective activities in educational computer game playing.In Koschmann, T, Hall, R, & Miyake, N (Ed.), CSCL 2, Carrying Forward the Conversation, 111-128, CSCL 2, Carrying Forward the Conversation, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 297-310", ~ (2002)
  15. Kraut,R., "Coordination in software development", Communications of ACM, 38(3), pp.69~81 (1995)
  16. Lipponen,L., "Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. In G, Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: foundations for CSCL community,?proceedings?of CSCL 2002, Boulder, CL, 111-118", ~ (2002)
  17. Liu,X., "Sociocultural factors affecting the success of an online MBA course", Performance Improvement Quarterly, 19(2), pp.69~92 (2006)
  18. Maier,E., "Activity theory as a framework for accommodating cultural factors in HCI Studies, Workshop Proceeding der5. fachubergreifenden Konferenz Mensch und Computer. Wien: Oesterreichsche Computer Gesellschaft, 69-79", ~ (2005)
  19. Makkittalo,K., "Online collaborative learning: will collaboration scripts reduce uncertainty", Educational Technology, 45(5), pp.25~29 (2005)
  20. Malone,T., "The interdisciplinary study of coordination", ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), pp.87~119 (1994)
  21. Marken,J., "An application of activity theory: A case of global training", Performance Improvement Quarterly, 19(2), pp.27~50 (2006)
  22. Oshima, J., "Coordination of asynchronous and synchronous communication: difference in qualities of knowledge advancement discourse between experts and novices, In?Koschmann, T. et al.(Ed.), 55-84,CSCL 2, Carrying Forward the Conversation, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates", ~ (2001)
  23. Palloff, M, "Collaborating Online; Learning Together in Community" (2005), CA: Jossey-Bass
  24. Reeves,T., "Enhancing the worth of instructional technology research through “Design Experiments” and other development research strategies. A paper presented “international perspectives on instructional technology research for the 21st century”. a symposium sponsored by SIG", instructional technology at the annual meeting of AERA, New Orleans. LA, 2000
  25. Rourke,L., "Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts", International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, pp.8~22 (2001)
  26. Rummel,N., "Learning to collaborate: an instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings", Journal of Learning Sciences, 14(2), pp.201~241 (2005)
  27. Stoyannova,N., "Learning effectiveness of concept mapping in a computer- supported collaborative problem solving design", Euro CSCL Conference Proceedings (2001)
  28. Thomas,R., "Online project-based learning: how collaborative strategies and problem solving processes impact performance", Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(1), pp.83~107 (2005)
  29. Weigand,H., "Coordination through communication, Proceedings of the 8th International Working Conference on the Language-Action Perspectives on Communication Modelling", Tilburg, Netherlands (2003)
  30. Yamagata-Lynch,L, "Using activity theory as an analytic lens for examining technology professional development in schools", Mind Culture and Activity, 10(2), pp.100~119 (2003)
  31. Zimmerman,J., "Construct validation of strategy Model of student self-regulated learning", Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), pp.284~290 (1988)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)