본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

金景善筆下的北京形象研究

The Image of Beijing in the Writings of Kim Kyung-sun

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

道光年間, 來訪的朝鲜使臣或多或少地受到“北學論”的影響, 他們減弱了對清朝的敵視, 主張學習先進的科學技術從而改善朝鮮的民生。 而且, 西方科學技術和文化也陸續地傳入到中國。 與以往的朝鮮使臣相比, 道光朝的朝鮮使臣的國際視域更為寬廣, 他們能夠在更加多元的文化環境中審視清朝和自身。 道光十二年(1832年), 金景善作為書狀官出使中國, 將他在中國的所見所聞結集為≪燕轅直指≫。 金景善以敏銳的觀察力和深邃的洞察力, 為我們描寫了道光年間北京的真實風貌, 具有較高的研究價值。 金景善筆下的北京形象, 主要有以下几个方面:首先是氣勢恢宏的北京城。 文化昌盛、歷史悠久, 不失皇都的風範。 其次是東西交匯的社會。 在北京城里居住着各國的使臣, 各種文化在這裏交匯碰撞, 但是囿於時代的局限, 金景善對於西方科學知識的接受仍停留在器物層面, 他未能意識到世界巨變即將到來, 令人惋惜。 其三是繁華尚奢的市肆。 金景善笔下的市肆呈现出狂歡的景象: 物阜民豐, 貨物繁多, 貿易發達、順暢, 人民安居樂業, 生活富足。 但在這浮華的背後隱藏的是尚奢成風、滿漢矛盾不可調合的危機, 揭示了清朝走向衰落的必然性。 其四是壯麗宏侈的景觀。 金景善一方面讚賞景觀的壯麗之美, 並欣羡背後蘊含的強大國力和高超技藝; 另一方面卻對建造這些景觀的統治者給予勞民傷財的評價。 這種矛盾的態度, 正是金景善在“華夷之辨”和“北學中國”兩種對華觀之間搖擺不定的表現, 這也是道光朝時期朝鮮使臣試圖將清朝高超技藝與“蠻夷”文明分離的普遍認知。

Abstract

During the Daoguang period, visiting Korean envoys were more or less influenced by the Northern Learning Theory, which lessened their hostility to the Qing Dynasty and led them to advocate advanced science and technology to improve the people’s livelihood in Korea. Moreover, Western science technology and culture had been gradually introduced into China by this time. The Korean envoys of the Daoguang period had a broader international perspective than earlier envoys and were able to view the Qing Dynasty and themselves in a more diverse cultural context. In the twelfth year of Daoguang (1832), Jin Jingshan went to China as the Condescendence official and collected what he saw and heard in China as YanYuanZhiZhi, in which he describes the real style of Beijing in the Daoguang period with keen observations and deep insight, which gives this work high research value. the image of Beijing described by Jin Jingshan has the following aspects: First, Beijing was a magnificent city with a rich culture and a long history that had not lost the style of the imperial capital. Second, it was a society where east met west. In Beijing, where envoys from various countries lived, various cultures met and collided. However, due to the limitations of the time, Jin Jingshan’s acceptance of western scientific knowledge remained at the level of objects, and he thus failed to realize that great changes in the world were underway. Third, Beijing hosted a bustling and luxurious market. The shops presented a carnival scene: abundant material and people, a wide range of goods, well-developed and smooth trade, and people living and working in peace and contentment. However, hidden behind this grandiosity was the crisis of luxury and irreconcilable contradiction between Manchu and Han, which revealed the inevitability of the Qing Dynasty’s decline. Fourth was the magnificent landscape. On the one hand, Jin Jingshan admired the magnificent beauty of the landscape and the great national strength and superb skills behind it; on the other hand, the rulers who built these landscapes were evaluated as profligate. This contradictory attitude embodies Jin Jingshan’s wavering between two views of China, “the differentiation of Hua & Yi” and “the China of Northern Learning,” which were the common conceptions of Korean envoys during the Daoguang period who tried to separate the high skills of the Qing Dynasty from its barbarian culture.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 金景善著, "燕行錄全集 70、71、72輯" (2001), 東國大學校出版部
  2. 朴智鲜, "金景善의 <燕辕直指>考察", 韩国文学论丛, 16 (1995), 한국문학회
  3. 田逸宇, "<燕轅直指>研究", 崇實語文, 19 (2003), 崇實語文學會
  4. 권정수, "金景善의 燕辕直指에 나타난西洋势力에 대한 叙述과 认识", pp.2006
  5. 郑惠仲, "19세기 초 朝鲜使行 金景善의 북경체험과 외국정보 이해", pp.2005
  6. 徐東日, "朝鮮使臣眼中的中國形象" (2010), 中華書局
  7. 葛兆光, "想像異域 : 讀李朝朝鮮漢文燕行文獻劄記" (2014), 中華書局
  8. 葛兆光, "宅茲中國—重建有關“中國”的歷史論述" (2011), 中華書局
  9. 漆永祥, "燕行錄千種解題" (2021), 北京大學出版社
  10. 孟華編, "比較文學形象學" (2001), 北京大學出版社
  11. 韓龍浩, "19世紀≪燕行錄≫中的中國形象研究", pp.2011
  12. 李根碩, "朝鮮的中國想像與體驗(從17世紀到19世紀)——以<燕行錄>為中心", pp.2012
  13. 顏寧寧, "金景善的<燕轅直指>研究", pp.2008
  14. 楊盼盼, "朝鮮朝使臣眼中的道光朝", pp.2008
  15. 徐東日, "朝鮮燕行使臣筆下的“紫禁城”形象", 吉林大學社會科學學報, (6), pp.142~148 (2009)
  16. 孫成旭, "明清朝鮮使者眼中的“皇都”形象", 北京社會科學, (2), pp.81~89 (2017)
  17. 曹虹, "≪燕轅直指≫的清朝觀", 嶺南學報, (03), pp.231~245 (2016)
  18. 朴匯嵐, "金景善≪燕轅直指≫中的19世紀中國認識研究", 韓國語教學與研究, (01), pp.119~126 (2022)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)