본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Remembering How: Language, Memory, and the Salience of Manner

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Inspired by Talmy’s (1985, 2000) seminal work on the lexicalization of motion events, the linguistic encoding of elements of motion events has been an active area of research. Recently, Slobin (2003, 2004, 2006) refined Talmy’s typology, pointing out the differential salience of manner of motion across languages. Among the potential cognitive consequences of this differential salience of manner, Slobin (2003) postulates that manner might be more memorable for speakers of high-manner-salient languages than for speakers of low-manner-salient languages. In this paper, we take up this suggestion, asking whether English speakers and Spanish speakers will show different patterns of errors in a test of recognition for short video clips of motion events, consistent with the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. We observed that English speakers produced fewer errors overall, and fewer errors in responses to previously unseen items. Responses to previously viewed items revealed a more subtle effect, with the number of videos viewed at study playing a role in the language effect: English speakers made fewer errors on previously viewed items when they had seen fewer items at study, while Spanish speakers made fewer errors when they had seen more items at study. We discuss the implications of these findings for the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis and for the role of manner salience in memory for motion events.

Abstract

Inspired by Talmy’s (1985, 2000) seminal work on the lexicalization of motion events, the linguistic encoding of elements of motion events has been an active area of research. Recently, Slobin (2003, 2004, 2006) refined Talmy’s typology, pointing out the differential salience of manner of motion across languages. Among the potential cognitive consequences of this differential salience of manner, Slobin (2003) postulates that manner might be more memorable for speakers of high-manner-salient languages than for speakers of low-manner-salient languages. In this paper, we take up this suggestion, asking whether English speakers and Spanish speakers will show different patterns of errors in a test of recognition for short video clips of motion events, consistent with the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. We observed that English speakers produced fewer errors overall, and fewer errors in responses to previously unseen items. Responses to previously viewed items revealed a more subtle effect, with the number of videos viewed at study playing a role in the language effect: English speakers made fewer errors on previously viewed items when they had seen fewer items at study, while Spanish speakers made fewer errors when they had seen more items at study. We discuss the implications of these findings for the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis and for the role of manner salience in memory for motion events.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Aske, J., "Path predicates in English and Spanish : A closer look", Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 15, pp.1~14 (1989)
  2. Berman, R. A., "Relating events in narrative: A cross-linguistic developmental study" (1994), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  3. Cifuentes-Féez, P., "Naming motion events in Spanish and English", Cognitive Linguistics, 174, pp.443~462 (2006)
  4. Feist, M. I., "Codability and cost in the naming of motion events", Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio
  5. Feist, M. I., "Motion through syntactic frames", Cognition, 115, pp.192~196 (2010)
  6. Feist, M. I., "Salience and acceptability in Spanish manner verbs: A preliminary view", International Journal of English Studies, 7(1), pp.137~148 (2007)
  7. Filipović L., "Speaking and remembering in one or two languages: Bilingual vs. monolingual lexicalization and memory for motion events", International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(4), pp.466~485 (2011)
  8. Finkbeiner, M., "The role of language in memory for actions", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(5), pp.447~457 (2002)
  9. Gennari, S. P., "Motion events in language and cognition", Cognition, 83, pp.49~79 (2002)
  10. Kersten, A. W., "English speakers attend more strongly than Spanish speakers to manner of motion when classifying novel objects and events", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), pp.638~653 (2010)
  11. Mayer, M., "Frog, where are you?" (1969), Dial Press
  12. Naigles, L. R., "Speaking of motion : Verb use in English and Spanish", Language and Cognitive Processes, 135, pp.521~549 (1998)
  13. Naigles, L. R., "Motion-verb generalizations in English and Spanish : Influences of language and syntax", Psychological Science, 95, pp.363~369 (1998)
  14. Papafragou, A., "Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements", Cognition, 108, pp.155~184 (2008)
  15. Papafragou, A., "Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll : The representation of motion in language and cognition", Cognition, 84, pp.189~219 (2002)
  16. Papafragou, A., "When English proposes what Greek presupposes: The cross-linguistic encoding of motion events", Cognition, 98, pp.B75~B87 (2006)
  17. Sinha, C., "Distributed spatial semantics", Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 18, pp.167~199 (1995)
  18. Slobin, D. I., "From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking, In Rethinking linguistic relativity", pp.195~217 (1996), Cambridge University Press
  19. Slobin, D. I., "Language and thought online: cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity, In Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought", pp.157~191 (2003), MIT Press
  20. Slobin, D. I., "The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events, In Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives", pp.219~257 (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  21. Slobin, D. I., "What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition, In Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories", pp.59~81 (2006), John Benjamins
  22. Slobin, D. I., "Reference to movement in spoken and signed language: Typological considerations", In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.487~505 (1994), Berkeley Linguistics Society
  23. Talmy, L., "Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms, In Language typology and syntactic description Vol. 3", pp.57~149 (1985), Cambridge University Press
  24. Talmy, L., "Toward a cognitive semantics Vol. 2" (2000), MIT Press
  25. Whorf, B. L., "Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf" (1956), MIT Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)