房屋次承租人优先购买权相关问题探析
The Rule against Double Jeopardy in the United States
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
随着市场经济的快速增长和城镇化进程的不断推进,房屋租赁市场也开始蓬勃发展,其中房屋转租现象的增长尤为突出。转租系经出租人同意后由承租人直接与次承租人签订的房屋租赁合同,出租人并不是转租合同的当事人。中国《合同法》仅规定了承租人的优先购买权,事实上不论是从次承租人对房屋的依赖程度,还是从次承租人的经济地位而言,次承租人相较于出租人与转租人都是弱者。在实务中,由于中国《合同法》并未规定次承租人是否享有优先购买权,因此次承租人往往难以主张权利,各地法院对此类案件的判决也大相径庭。随着房屋转租纠纷的增多,增加保护次承租人优先购买权的法律规定已迫在眉睫。本文正是基于这一写作目的,首先对优先购买权和转租的概念进行阐述,分析了目前学界关于优先购买权性质的几种学说,结合次承租人优先购买权自身的性质,得出优先购买权为强制缔约请求权的结论。然后从合同相对性、占有持续功能和法律解释三个角度入手,对次承租人享有优先购买权的合理性进行了理论分析。在此基础上结合承租人优先购买权的行使条件探究了次承租人优先购买权的行使条件。最后在承认承租人与次承租人可以同时享有优先购买权的前提下,分情况讨论了承租人与次承租人在同时主张优先购买权时哪一方顺位在先的问题。
Abstract
With the rapid growth of the market economy and the progress of the urbanization process, the housing market has begun to flourish. especially the growth of housing sublease. The house-subletting is the lease contract signed between the lessee and the sub-lessee, under the premise of the lessor's admission, and the lessor is not the parties of the contract. The contract law of our country only stipulates the preemptive right of the lessee ,in fact, the sub-lessees are weaker than lessors and lessees whether in the degree of dependence on houses or in economic status. In practice, since the contract law of our country does not stipulate whether the sub-lessee applies the preemptive right, it is often difficult for the sub-lessees to claim the right, and the courts are not unanimous in the judgments of such cases. With the increase of housing sublease disputes, it is urgent to increase the relevant laws to protect the preemptive right of the sub-lessee. Based on this purpose, this paper first expounds the concept of preemptive right and sublease, analyzes several theories about the nature of preemptive right in the academic field, and concludes that the preemptive right is the right of compulsory contracting. Then, from the perspective of the relativity of the contract, the function of property possession and the legal interpretation, The rationality of the preemptive right of the sub-lessee is analyzed theoretically. On this basis, the exercise condition of the preemptive right of sub-lessee is explored based on the exercise condition of the lessee's preemptive right. Finally, on the premise that the lessee and the sub-lessee can claim the preemptive right at the same time, it discusses how to resolve the conflict between the sub-lessee's preemptive right and lessee's preemptive right.
참고문헌 (33)
- 孙宪忠, "德国当代物权法" (1997), 法律出版社
- 王泽鉴, "民法学说与判例研究(第1册)" (2009), 中国政法大学出版社
- 王泽鉴, "民法物权:第二册:用益物权:占有" (2001), 中国政法大学出版社
- 王泽鉴, "民法概要" (2003), 中国政法大学出版社
- 王利明, "中国民法典草案建议稿及说明" (2004), 中国法制出版社
- 王利明, "合同法" (2005), 中国政法大学出版社
- 王利明, "物权法研究" (2005), 中国人民大学出版社
- 许尚豪, "优先购买权制度研究" (2006), 中国法制出版社
- 何志, "合同法原理精要与实务指南" (2008), 人民法院出版社
- 林诚二, "民法总则(上册)" (2008), 法律出版社
- 唐烈英, "房地产法学" (2008), 法律出版社
- 王泽鉴, "民法物权" (2009), 北京大学出版社
- 奚晓明, "最高人民法院关于审理城镇房屋租赁合同纠纷案件司法解释的理解与适用" (2009), 人民法院出版社
- 王利明, "合同法新问题研究" (2011), 中国社会科学出版社
- 胡康生, "中华人民共和国合同法释义" (2013), 法律出版社
- 张新荣, "试论“优先购买权”及其法律保护", 法学, (9) (1989)
- 任泰山, "房屋租赁关系中承租人、次承租人顺位探讨", 当代法学, (7) (2003)
- 华国宇, "次承租人的优先购买权问题探析", 发展, (2) (2010)
- 冉克平, "论房屋承租人的优先购买权——兼评最高人民法院《房屋租赁合同司法解释》第21- 24条", 法学评论, (4) (2010)
- 周霖, "浅论合同相对性原则及其突破", 法制与社会, (3) (2014)
- 马超, "论合同相对性原则突破的原因、内涵与价值", 河北法学, (7) (2013)
- 王 睿, "期待权概念之理论源流与界定", 北方法学, (62) (2017)
- 季林云, "论房屋承租人优先购买权制度", 硕士, pp.2007
- 罗天明, "论房屋承租人优先购买权", 硕士, pp.2008
- 陈鹏, "占有制度价值研究", 硕士, pp.2010
- 葛慧超, "城市私有房屋转租中次承租人权益保护研究", 硕士, pp.2010
- 徐菁, "房屋转租中次承租人利益保护的法律问题研究", 硕士, pp.2011
- 于娟, "论房屋转租中次承租人的优先购买权", 硕士, pp.2011
- 陈海华, "房屋转租中次承租人之利益保护研究", 硕士, pp.2012
- 邹洁, "房屋转租中次承租人权益保护研究", 硕士, pp.2014
- 练昌红, "论房屋次承租人的优先购买权", 硕士, pp.2014
- 彭政宁, "房屋承租人优先购买权制度研究", 硕士, pp.2017
- 唐诗瑾, "论承租人优先购买权的行使与限制", 硕士, pp.2017
