본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

아리스토텔레스의 「시학」 바라보는 엇갈린 눈길 - 셰익스피어의 「햄릿」과 체호프의 「갈매기」를 중심으로

The cross glances on the 「Poetics」 of Aristoteles

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Aristoteles in 「Poetics」 said that the most important element of the tragedy is plot. He emphasized that the tragedy without characters is possible, but the tragedy without plot isn't possible. By the way the most important element in tragedy, which lead the accident on the stage, isn't plot, but character. Here is a reason. The aim of the ancient greek tragedies is Catharsis, occurred by well-built plot. An audience by means of Catharsis could affirm that he is one of the commune, polis, and purify the wicked emotions in his mind. But in the tragedy of W. Shakespeare, the representative playwright in the epoch of the Elizabeth, Catharsis was no more the aim of the theatre. The bourgeoise audience, that at that time new formed, demanded the high leveled theatre with interesting spectacles. They wanted the pleasure in the theatre, because they were the son of the capitalism. The accident of the stage in Chekhov's drama 「The sea gull」 relied on the change of the relationship between the characters and the subtle emotion. The disposition of the important accident on the stage made a great difference between Shakespeare and Chekhov. Because the russian playwright interested in the collapse of the social environment where the dramatis personae lived. Their difference had influenced upon also the viewpoint of theatre. Shakespeare had the faith that human life is play, the world is theatre. He thought that theatre is a mirror which reflects direct the life and world. But Chekhov, depicted the trembling russian intelligentsia in the end of 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, interested in the endless falling life of them.

Abstract

Aristoteles in 「Poetics」 said that the most important element of the tragedy is plot. He emphasized that the tragedy without characters is possible, but the tragedy without plot isn't possible. By the way the most important element in tragedy, which lead the accident on the stage, isn't plot, but character. Here is a reason. The aim of the ancient greek tragedies is Catharsis, occurred by well-built plot. An audience by means of Catharsis could affirm that he is one of the commune, polis, and purify the wicked emotions in his mind. But in the tragedy of W. Shakespeare, the representative playwright in the epoch of the Elizabeth, Catharsis was no more the aim of the theatre. The bourgeoise audience, that at that time new formed, demanded the high leveled theatre with interesting spectacles. They wanted the pleasure in the theatre, because they were the son of the capitalism. The accident of the stage in Chekhov's drama 「The sea gull」 relied on the change of the relationship between the characters and the subtle emotion. The disposition of the important accident on the stage made a great difference between Shakespeare and Chekhov. Because the russian playwright interested in the collapse of the social environment where the dramatis personae lived. Their difference had influenced upon also the viewpoint of theatre. Shakespeare had the faith that human life is play, the world is theatre. He thought that theatre is a mirror which reflects direct the life and world. But Chekhov, depicted the trembling russian intelligentsia in the end of 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, interested in the endless falling life of them.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 니체, "비극의 탄생" (2007), 아카넷
  2. 도슨, "극과 극적 요소" (1992), 서울대출판부
  3. 셰익스피어, "햄릿" (2012), 해누리
  4. 아리스토텔레스, "시학" (2006), 문예출판사
  5. 아이스킬로스-소포클레스, "희랍비극" (1998), 현암사
  6. 에코, "장미의 이름" (2002), 열린 책들
  7. 여석기, "나의 햄릿 강의" (2008), 생각의 나무
  8. 윌리엄스, "현대비극론" (1985), 까치
  9. 이글턴, "세익스피어 다시 읽기" (1996), 민음사
  10. 존 펙, 마틴 코일, "셰익스피어를 어떻게 읽을 것인가" (1992), 사민서각
  11. 김규종, "체호프 희곡전집" (2010), 시공사
  12. 포제너, "셰익스피어" (1998), 한길사
  13. 포티어, "현대이론과 연극" (1999), 월인
  14. 하우저, "문학과 예술의 사회사 (현대편)" (1983), 창작과 비평
  15. Балухатый, С, "Вопросы поэтики", Л., ~ (1990)
  16. Бердников, Г, "Чехов-Драматург", ~ (1983)
  17. Основин, В, "Русская драматургия второй половины XIX века", М., ~ (1980)
  18. Паперный, З, "Вопреки Всем Правилам", М., ~ (1982)
  19. Полоцкая, Э, "О поетике Чехова, Издание второе", М., ~ (2001)
  20. Роскин, А. А. П, "Чехов Статьи и очерки", М., ~ (1959)
  21. "Русский советский театр 1917-1921 (документы и материалы)", М., ~ (1968)
  22. Чехов, А, "Собрание сочинений, том 12", 86~91 (1961)
  23. Bordinat, P, "Dramatic Structure in Chekhov's Uncle Vanya, In Chekhov's Great Plays", pp.35~47 (1981), New York University Press
  24. Webster's II, "New College Dictionary" (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)