아리시마 다케오(有島武郎)의 성서이해를 통한『삼부곡(三部曲)』연구
A study on『The three dramas』 based on Arishima Takeo's comprehension of the Bible
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Arishima Takeo wrote 「The three dramas」that are based on the Bible after apostatizing from Christianity. Are they based on his potential faith or his antipathy to Christianity? Miyano Mituo said Arishima thought of a human Jesus which different from orthodox interpretation as his ideal type. It can be said that Arishima apostatized from Christianity, but he has his own faith about Jesus. In this paper, I explored how distress caused by the irreconcilable minds of God and human are resolved and how the relationship between a man and a woman is changed from breakup to harmony through 「The three dramas」.「The three dramas」includes ‘Before the Flood’, ‘Samson and Delilah’ and ‘The Lord's Supper’. First, in the relationship between God and human, I researched about the salvation that 「The three dramas」showed. Arishima interpreted salvation stories of the Bible as he wished, and it showed doubts about God’s authority. Second, in the relationship between a man and a woman I researched about death as「The three dramas」showed and about women; that is, a woman that is double-hearted, a woman that betrays, and a woman that commits adultery. If it means salvation to someone, it will mean death to others. There are many deaths in「The three drams」. What is interesting is that death is relevant to betrayal. A double-hearted woman, Naama loved an angel and Japheth at the same time. This is considered to be how Arisima’s mind treats Christianity. Delilah betrayed Samson because she loved him and she wanted to make sure of his love. The love of Delilah was not understood. It is nothing less than Arishima what called ‘betrayal’. As for a woman that committed adultery, Mary Magdalene was a double-hearted woman and a betraying woman, but she was forgiven her sin by Jesus and became a woman that only comprehended Jesus. It is Arishima Takeo that comprehends Jesus as human being.「The three drams」 represents much of Arishima’s desire to recover from ‘betrayal’.
Abstract
Arishima Takeo wrote 「The three dramas」that are based on the Bible after apostatizing from Christianity. Are they based on his potential faith or his antipathy to Christianity? Miyano Mituo said Arishima thought of a human Jesus which different from orthodox interpretation as his ideal type. It can be said that Arishima apostatized from Christianity, but he has his own faith about Jesus. In this paper, I explored how distress caused by the irreconcilable minds of God and human are resolved and how the relationship between a man and a woman is changed from breakup to harmony through 「The three dramas」.「The three dramas」includes ‘Before the Flood’, ‘Samson and Delilah’ and ‘The Lord's Supper’. First, in the relationship between God and human, I researched about the salvation that 「The three dramas」showed. Arishima interpreted salvation stories of the Bible as he wished, and it showed doubts about God’s authority. Second, in the relationship between a man and a woman I researched about death as「The three dramas」showed and about women; that is, a woman that is double-hearted, a woman that betrays, and a woman that commits adultery. If it means salvation to someone, it will mean death to others. There are many deaths in「The three drams」. What is interesting is that death is relevant to betrayal. A double-hearted woman, Naama loved an angel and Japheth at the same time. This is considered to be how Arisima’s mind treats Christianity. Delilah betrayed Samson because she loved him and she wanted to make sure of his love. The love of Delilah was not understood. It is nothing less than Arishima what called ‘betrayal’. As for a woman that committed adultery, Mary Magdalene was a double-hearted woman and a betraying woman, but she was forgiven her sin by Jesus and became a woman that only comprehended Jesus. It is Arishima Takeo that comprehends Jesus as human being.「The three drams」 represents much of Arishima’s desire to recover from ‘betrayal’.
참고문헌 (11)
- 김학철, "렘브란트 성서를 그리다", pp.72~74 (2011), 대한기독교서회
- 有島武郎, "有島武郎全集3" (1924), 叢文閣
- 有島武郎, "有島武郎全集5" (1924), 叢文閣
- 有島武郎, "有島武郎全集7" (1924), 叢文閣
- 有島武郎, "有島武郎全集10" (1924), 叢文閣
- 石丸晶子, "日本文学資料叢書 有島武郎", pp.8~11 (1973), 有精堂
- 内村鑑三, "背教者としての有島武郎氏" (1923), 万朝報
- 江種満子, "作品論 有島武郎", pp.284~ (1981), 双文社
- 川鎮郎, "有島武郎とキリスト教並びにその周辺", pp.43~ (1998), 笠間書院
- 増子正一, "有島武郎研究", pp.75~ (1994), 新教出版社
- 宮野光男, "有島武郎の文学", pp.59~65 (1974)
