아리시마 다케오(有島武郎)의 『삼손과 데릴라(サムソンとデリラ)』 연구 - 눈이 머는 삼손(Blendung Simons) -
A Study on Arishima Takeo’s 『Samson and Delilah』
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
『サムソンとデリラ』(1919)は聖書の士師記のサムソンとデリラ物語をモチーフとした有島武郎の「三部曲」の一つである。サムソンの物語と言えばデリラの裏切りを思い浮かぶが、聖書のデリラと違って、『サムソンとデリラ』のデリラはサムソンを愛し、そのためサムソンを裏切る。そして『サムソンとデリラ』には‘見る’という表現がよく出ているし、サムソンは誰よりも見ることに影響を受けている人物である。しかしサムソンの母の話によると、サムソンはちゃんと見ない人物である。サムソンにとって‘見る’ということは彼の失明に至ってその意味が強調される。つまりサムソンは失明してから本当の意味で‘見る’ようになる。これは『サムソンとデリラ』の全体の構成が‘見る’ことから‘見られない’ことへ変わっていく過程になっていることを意味する。またその中での意味探しが有島武郎のサムソン物語のオリジナリティーだと言えるだろう。最後に、‘眼が見えない’サムソンは“眼が醜く光を失つた今、サムソンの心の眼はエホバの御心をも見る事が出来る”と告白している。『サムソンとデリラ』を通してナジルのサムソンが神様を裏切ったことに気づいていく過程を辿っていくことが出来る。つまり『サムソンとデリラ』は神様に対するサムソンの裏切り物語と言えるだろう。
Abstract
Arishima Takeo wrote Samson and Delilah(1919) that was based on the story of Samson and Delilah in the Bible. First, when we speak of the story Samson, we usually recall the betrayal of Delilah. But unlike Delilah in the Bible, Delilah betrayed Samson in Samson and Delilah because she loved Samson. Women’s betrayal is repeated in Samson and Delilah. Also there are a number of instances of the verb ‘see’ in Samson and Delilah. In addition, Samson is a person who is influenced by what he ‘sees.’ But according to Samson’s mother, Samson is a person who cannot see clearly and rightly. For Samson, the meaning of ‘seeing’ was emphasized when he lost his sight. In other words, Samson could see clearly after losing his sight. It means that the plot of Samson and Delilah consisted of the processes that change from ‘sight’ to ‘blindness.’ I think that finding the meaning which underlies these processes is Arishima Takeo’s Samson and Delilah’s innovation. At the end of the story, ‘blind’ Samson confessed, “After losing my ugly sight, Samson’s eyes can see the heart of the Lord.” Samson could realize the fact that he was the one who betrayed God. In short, Samson and Delilah can be read as a story of Samson’s betrayal of God.
참고문헌 (23)
- 굿모닝성경편찬위원회, "성경전서 개역개정판", pp.391~ (2007), 대한성서공회
- 김종두, "영웅 이야기로서 성서의 삼손 이야기와 밀턴의 『투사 삼손』 비교 연구", 고전중세르네상스영문학, 13(2), pp.375~393 (2003), 한국고전중세르네상스영문학회
- 김종두, "영화 『삼손과 데릴라』와 밀턴의 『투사 삼손』비교 연구 -원전인 성서의 삼손 이야기와의차이점을 중심으로", 영어영문학연구, 30(3), pp.51~70 (2004), 대한영어영문학회
- 김학철, "렘브란트, 성서를 그리다", pp.70~76 (2010), 대한기독교서회
- 김학철, "성서화비평과 성서화가(聖書畵家) - 성서화가 렘브란트와 그의 성서화를 중심으로", 한국기독교신학논총, (73), pp.259~286 (2011), 한국기독교학회
- 대한성서공회성경편집팀, "ESV한영성경", pp.426~ (2013), 대한성서공회
- 소태영, "렘브란트, 성서를 가르치다: 렘브란트의 문학비평적 성서해석과 드라마틱한 성서교육", 기독교교육 논총, (46), pp.167~204 (2016), 한국기독교교육학회[DOI]
- 정형준, "삼손, 설화의 문학적 성격", 신학연구, 37, pp.261~310 (1996), 한신신학연구소
- 최창모, "삼손의 수수께끼(사사기 14:14, 18) 연구", 한국중동학회논총, 25(2), pp.221~238 (2005), 한국중동학회[DOI]
- 有島武郎, "有島武郎全集 第3巻", pp.421~478 (1924), 叢文閣
- 有島武郎, "有島武郎全集 第7巻", pp.647~648 (1925), 叢文閣
- 有島武郎, "有島武郎全集第第12巻", pp.865~972 (1925), 叢文閣
- 内田 満, "有島武郎 虚像と実像", pp.119~127 (1996), 有精堂
- 江種満子, "作品論 有島武郎", pp.269~289 (1981), 双文社
- 江種満子, "有島武郎論", pp.116~135 (1984), 横楓社
- 共同譯聖書實行委員會, "聖書新共同訳", pp.410~ (1988), 日本聖書協会
- 共同譯聖書實行委員會, "聖書新共同訳", pp.1051~ (1988), 日本聖書協会
- 米倉 充, "近代文学とキリスト教", pp.43~46 (1983), 創元社
- 増子正一, "有島武郎研究", pp.423~606 (1994), 新教出版社
- 宮野光男, "有島武郎の文学", pp.225~245 (1974), 桜楓社
- 渡辺凱一, "晩年の有島武郎", pp.146~174 (1978), 渡辺出版
- "두산백과"[URL]
- "위키백과"[URL]
