AP 결과술어와 PP 결과술어의 비교
The comparative analysis between AP resultatives and PP resultatives
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, I analyse resultatives, a kind of construction in which a process is followed by the indication of telicity: prepositional phrases(PP resultatives); adjectival phrase resultatives(AP resultatives). It is argued that AP resultatives and PP resultatives have different syntactic structures. Adopting a view of l-syntax in accordance with Folli & Ramchand(2004), I suggest that they have three projections, that is, vP, VP and RP which are necessary to represent the event structure. The predicational link between English AP resultatives and their arguments can be possible due to the existence of null R heads, while PP resultatives can be formed through the existence in accomplishment PP.
Abstract
In this paper, I analyse resultatives, a kind of construction in which a process is followed by the indication of telicity: prepositional phrases(PP resultatives); adjectival phrase resultatives(AP resultatives). It is argued that AP resultatives and PP resultatives have different syntactic structures. Adopting a view of l-syntax in accordance with Folli & Ramchand(2004), I suggest that they have three projections, that is, vP, VP and RP which are necessary to represent the event structure. The predicational link between English AP resultatives and their arguments can be possible due to the existence of null R heads, while PP resultatives can be formed through the existence in accomplishment PP.
참고문헌 (21)
- 남승호, "한국어 술어의 사건구조와 상적 의미", 인문논총, 52, pp.75~124 (2004)
- 노명현, "영어와 국어의 결과구문 연구", 현대영미어문학, 25(4), pp.119~145 (2007)
- 양정석, "한국어 통사구조론" (2005), 한국문화사
- 채희락, "이동동사의 정의와 분류", 현대문법연구, 15, pp.79~100 (1999)
- Basilico,D., "The topic of Small Clauses", Linguistic Inquiry, 13, pp.75~124 (2003)
- Bowers, J., "Predication in The handbook of contemporary?syntactic theory" (2001), Blackwell
- Bosrsely,R., "Syntactic Theory:A Unified Approach.Oxford University Press Inc" (1999), Oxford University Press Inc.
- Carrier, J, "The Argument structure and Syntactic Structure of Resultatives", Linguistic Inquiry, 23(2), pp.173~234 (1992)
- Contreras,H., "Small clauses and Complex predicates in Syntax and Semantics V. 28" (1995), Academic Press
- Folli, R, "Prepositions and Results in Italian and English: An analysis from event decomposition; Perspectives on Aspect", pp.1~25 (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Goldberg, A, "The English as a Family of Construction", Language, 80, pp.532~569 (2004)
- Levin, B, "An event structure account of English resultatives", Language, 77(4), pp.766~797 (2001)
- Iwata,S, "Argument resultatives and adjunct resultatives in a lexical constructional account: the case of resultatives with adjectival result phrases", Language Sciences, 28, pp.449~496 (2006)
- Kim, S, "A Cross-linguistic Perspective on Resultative Construction. In The Syntax and semantics of Predication" (1997), University of Texas
- Rothstein,S., "Secondary Predication. In The Blackwell? Companion to Syntax Ⅳ" (2006), Blackwell Publishing
- Simpson,J., "Resultatives. in Lexical Functional Grammar" (1983), Indiana University Linguistic Club
- Son, M., "Directionality and Resultativity: the Cross-linguistic Correlation Revisited. CASTL Tromso. www.ub.uit.no", baser, 2007[DOI]
- Stowell.T., "Remarks on Clause Structure. Syntax and semantics V. 28" (1995), Academic Press
- Svenonius,P., "Spatial P in English,CASTL,University of Tromso.www.hum.uit.no", a, papers, pp.PEnglish3[DOI]
- Tenny,C.L., "Grammaticalizing Aspect and Affectedness", 석사, pp.1987
- Wechsler, S, "On resultative predicate and clauses: Parallels between Korean and English", language Sciences, 23, pp.391~423 (2001)