A Comparative Analysis of Resultative Constructions in English and Korean
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In English, resultative secondary predicates are mostly realized as adjectives, whereas in Korean they are realized as adverbials. We assume that this morphological difference between the two languages is due to different lexicalization patterns of motion events between verb-framed languages such as Korean and satellite-framed languages such as English. This morphological difference causes some syntactic differences between English and Korean resultative constructions. The previous analyses – small clause complement analysis, flat ternary analysis, adjunction analysis – all have syntactic and theoretical problems and are not adequate enough to explain the differences between English and Korean resultative constructions. Rather, in this paper we propose a new analysis of Korean resultatives, where resultative phrases in transitive and unaccusative resultatives are derived adverbs with the feature [+CAUSE, +telicity] and selected as an internal argument with the thematic role of Goal while RPs in unergative resultatives are adverbial clauses and adjoined to VP.
Abstract
In English, resultative secondary predicates are mostly realized as adjectives, whereas in Korean they are realized as adverbials. We assume that this morphological difference between the two languages is due to different lexicalization patterns of motion events between verb-framed languages such as Korean and satellite-framed languages such as English. This morphological difference causes some syntactic differences between English and Korean resultative constructions. The previous analyses – small clause complement analysis, flat ternary analysis, adjunction analysis – all have syntactic and theoretical problems and are not adequate enough to explain the differences between English and Korean resultative constructions. Rather, in this paper we propose a new analysis of Korean resultatives, where resultative phrases in transitive and unaccusative resultatives are derived adverbs with the feature [+CAUSE, +telicity] and selected as an internal argument with the thematic role of Goal while RPs in unergative resultatives are adverbial clauses and adjoined to VP.
참고문헌 (56)
- Beck, S., "Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development", pp.114~122 (2001), Cascadilla Press
- Bowers, J., "The Syntax of Predication", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.591~656 (1993)
- Bowers, J., "A Binary Analysis of Resultatives", Texas Linguistic Forum, 38, pp.48~58 (1997)
- Bowers, J., "The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory", pp.299~333 (2001), Blackwell
- Burzio, L., "Italian Syntax: A Government and Binding Approach" (1986), Reidel
- Carrier, J., "The Argument Structure and Syntactic Structure of Resultatives", Linguistic Inquiry, 23(2), pp.173~234 (1992)
- Chang, Y., "Secondary Predication and Default Case", ZAS Working Papers in Linguistics, 26, pp.113~126 (2001), ZAS
- Cinque, G., "A Null Theory of Phrase and Compound Stress", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.239~298 (1993)
- Croft, W., "Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar", pp.201~235 (2010), John Benjamins
- Dikken, M. den, "No Cause for a Small Clause? (Non-)Arguments for the Structure of Resultatives", Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik, 37, pp.89~105 (1994)
- Geuder, W., "Oriented Adverbs: Issues in the Lexical Semantics of Event Adverbs", Ph. D., pp.2000
- Goldberg, A., "It Can’t Go Down the Chimney up: Path and the English Resultative", Proceeding of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.368~378 (1991)
- Goldberg, A., "Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" (1995), University of Chicago Press
- Higginbotham, J., "On Semantics", Linguistic Inquiry, 16, pp.547~593 (1985)
- Hoekstra, T., "Small Clause Results", Lingua, 74, pp.101~139 (1988)
- 홍기선, "영어의 결과구문과 한국어의 “게” 구문", 언어, 36(4), pp.1143~1169 (2011), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Ishihara, S, "Scrambling and Its Interaction with Stress and Focus", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 38, pp.95~110 (2000)
- Jang, Y., "On the So-called Adjunct Predicates in Korean", Texas Linguistics Forum, 38, pp.149~160 (1997)
- 장영준, "Secondary Predicates, Complex Predicates, and Serial Verb Constructions in Natural Language", 현대문법연구, (44), pp.1~32 (2006), 현대문법학회
- Jang, Y., "Secondary Predication and Default Case", ZAS Working Papers in Linguistics, 26, pp.113~126 (2001)
- Kim, J.-B., "A Comparative Study between English and Korean Resultative Constructions", Language Research, 35, pp.57~90 (1999)
- Kim, S., "Description and Explanation in Korean Linguistics", pp.133~168 (1996), Cornell University
- Kratzer, A., "Stage-level and Individual-level Predicates", ms., pp.1989
- Kratzer, A., "Building Resultatives", ms, pp.2004
- Kuno, S., "Remarks of Unaccusativity and Unergativity in Japanese and Korean", Japanese, 2003, pp.12, 280~294
- Larson, R., "On the Double Object Construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.335~391 (1988)
- Larson, R., "Double Objects Revisited: Reply to Jackendoff", Linguistic Inquiry, 21, pp.589~632 (1990)
- Lee, J., "Toward a Unified Account of Resultative Constructions in Korean", Poster at the 30th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (2016)
- Lee, J., "Korean Resultative Constructions", The Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on HPSG, pp.169~188 (2003)
- 이상근, "A Causation-based Approach to Resultatives", 현대문법연구, (55), pp.119~140 (2009), 현대문법학회
- Lee, S-y., "Extraposition from NP and Two Subject Positions (written in Korean)", Journal of Language Science, 7(1), pp.191~213 (2000)
- 이성용, "Cyclic Computation of Focus Intonation in Numeral Quantifier Floating Constructions in Korean", 언어과학, 23(4), pp.281~306 (2016), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
- Levin, B., "Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface" (1995), MIT Press
- Li, A., "Order and Constituency in Mandarin Chinese" (1990), Kluwer
- Park, D.-W., ""-Key" Construction in Koreran", The Proceedings of the 10th Seoul International Conference on Linguistics (2010)
- Progovac, L., "Structure for Coordination (Part 1)", GLOT International, 3(7), pp.3~6 (1998)
- Rappaport Hovav, M., "The Projection of Arguments. Lexical and Compositional Factors", pp.97~34 (1998), CSLI Publications
- Rappaport Hovav, M., "An Event Structure Account of English Resultatives", Language, 77, pp.766~797 (2001)
- Rappaport Hovav, M., "Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure", pp.21~38 (2010), Oxford University Press
- Shim, J. Y., "NELS 38", pp.337~350 (2008), GLSA
- Snyder, W., "On the Nature of Syntactic Variation: Evidence from Complex Predicates and Complex Word-formation", Language, 77, pp.324~342 (2001)
- Son, M., "TromsØ Working Papers on Language and Linguistics: Nordlyd 35", pp.89~113 (2008), University of TromsØ
- Song. H., "Causatives and Resultatives in Korean", Ph. D., pp.2005
- Stroik, T., "Adverbs as V-sisters", Linguistic Inquiry, 21, pp.654~661 (1990)
- Stroik, T., "On the Distribution of Temporal and Locative Adverbials", Linguistic Review, 9, pp.267~284 (1992)
- Stroik, T., "Minimalism, Scope, and VP Structure" (1996), Sage Publications Inc
- Talmy, L., "Language Typology and Syntactic Description Ⅲ: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon", pp.57~149 (1985), Cambridge University Press
- Talmy, L., "Toward a Cognitive Semantics" (2000), MIT Press
- Van Valin, R., "Syntax" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Vendler, Z., "Linguistics in Philosophy" (1967), Cornell University Press
- Wechsler, S., "Resultative Predicates and Control", Texas Linguistics Forum, 38, pp.307~321 (1997)
- Wechsler, S., "An Analysis of English Resultatives Under the Event-Argument Homomorphism Model of Telicity", Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Text Structure, pp.1~15 (2001), University of Texas
- Wechsler, S., "The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation", pp.255~273 (2005), Oxford University Press
- Wechsler, S., "On Resultative Predicates and Clauses: Parallels between Korean and English", Language Sciences, 23, pp.391~423 (2001)
- 임창국, "한국어 이차술어 구문의 통사", 언어, 31(1), pp.125~141 (2006), 한국언어학회
- Zhang, N., "Coordination in Syntax" (2010), Cambridge University Press