Storytelling in Multi-party Face-to-Face Interaction: When the Principal Character of the Story Is Present
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Park, Jiseon. 2009. Storytelling in multi-party face-to-face interaction: When the principal character of the story is present. Discourse and Cognition 17.1, 69-90. The study examines a specific kind of storytelling: a principal character of the story being told is present and actively participates in the activity. Using video data and giving attention to what the present principal character does in the interaction as well as the teller of the story, the paper demonstrates that a storytelling in multi-party face-to-face interaction is a public, multi-party, and embodied interactive field. The study also explicates the ways in which participants of storytelling in face-to-face interaction take up a stance to the story and to other interlocutors as the story unfolds. The findings of the study suggest that stance should be understood as a social, public and interactional concept. The study emphasizes that the nature of storytelling in social interaction can be properly understood by describing how individual participants construct the telling of story in concert with one another and consequentially achieve their public existence. (Yonsei University)
Abstract
Park, Jiseon. 2009. Storytelling in multi-party face-to-face interaction: When the principal character of the story is present. Discourse and Cognition 17.1, 69-90. The study examines a specific kind of storytelling: a principal character of the story being told is present and actively participates in the activity. Using video data and giving attention to what the present principal character does in the interaction as well as the teller of the story, the paper demonstrates that a storytelling in multi-party face-to-face interaction is a public, multi-party, and embodied interactive field. The study also explicates the ways in which participants of storytelling in face-to-face interaction take up a stance to the story and to other interlocutors as the story unfolds. The findings of the study suggest that stance should be understood as a social, public and interactional concept. The study emphasizes that the nature of storytelling in social interaction can be properly understood by describing how individual participants construct the telling of story in concert with one another and consequentially achieve their public existence. (Yonsei University)
참고문헌 (27)
- Adelswärd, Viveka, "Laughter and dialogue: the social significance of laughter in institutional discourse", Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 12, pp.107~136 (1989)
- Bakhtin, Mikhail, "The Dialogic Imagination. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist" (1981), University of Texas Press
- Biber, Douglas, "Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect", Text, 9(1), pp.93~124 (1989)
- Chafe, Wallace, "Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology" (1986), Ablex
- Glenn, Phillip J, "Initiating shared laughter in multi-party conversations", Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53(2), pp.127~149 (1989)
- Goffman, Erving, "Footing. Forms of talk, ed. by Erving Goffman", pp.124~159 (1981), University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Goffman, Erving, "The frame analysis of talk. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience", pp.496~559 (1986), Northeastern University Press.
- Goodwin, Charles, "The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation, in Every day language: Studies in ethnomethodology" (1979), Irvington Publishers
- Goodwin, Charles, "Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers" (1981), Academic Press
- Goodwin, Charles, "Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. Structures of Social Action", pp.225~246 (1984), Cambridge University Press
- Goodwin, Charles, "Audience diversity, participation, and interpretation", Text, 6(3), pp.283~316 (1986)
- Goodwin, Charles, "Time in action.Current Anthropology", Current Anthropology, 43, pp.S19~S35 (2002)
- Goodwin, Charles, "A competent speaker who can’t speak: The social life of aphasia", Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14(2), pp.151~170 (2004)
- Goodwin, Charles, "Interactive footing. Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction", pp.16~46 (2007), Cambridge University Press
- Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, "He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among black children" (1990), Indiana University Press.
- Heritage, John, "A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement, in Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis", pp.299~345 (1984), Cambridge University Press.
- declination, in Everyday Language: Studies In Ethnomethodology, "A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance", pp.1979, Jefferson, Gail
- Jefferson, Gail, "On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles, in Structures of social action", pp.346~369 (1984), Cambridge University Press
- Labov, William, "Intensity. Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications", pp.43~70 (1984), Georgetown University Press
- Ochs, Elinor, "Constructing social identity: a language socialization perspective", Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(3), pp.287~306 (1993)
- Ochs, Elinor, "Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling" (2001), Harvard University Press
- Park, Robert E, "nature and collective behavior", The American Journal of Sociology, 32(5), pp.733~741 (1927)
- Precht, Kristen, "Stance moods in spoken English: evidentiality and affect in British and American conversation", Text, 23(2), pp.239~257 (2003)
- Sacks, Harvey, "Lectures on conversation. 2 volumes" (1995), Blackwell
- Sacks, Harvey, "A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation", Language, 50, pp.696~735 (1974)
- Schegloff, Emmauel, "Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis" (2007), Cambridge University Press
- Volosinov, Valentin N, "Marxism and the Philosophy of Language" (1973), Harvard University Press