본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Mapping ‘Punishment and Society’: An attempt to understand penality in contemporary South Korea

이헌영
아시아교정포럼 (Asian Forum for Corrections)|2022.12|교정담론 (Korean Journal of Correctional Discourse)|제16권 제3호|pp. 87-117

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

penal populism형벌 포퓰리즘형벌성‘Punishment and Society’the sociology of punishmentpenality형벌과 사회’형벌 사회학

초록

Historical research of penality, the sociology of punishment, or so-called the scholarship of ‘Punishment and Society’ are reletively new. Nonetheless, research in this discipline has been remarkably successful for the recent three decades. Although a few scholars have pointed out the relavance/importance of the socio-historical perspective and social theories in explaining punishment in South Korea, existing literature on punishment conducted from this perspective is rarely found in this country. This article serves two purposes: First, it illustrates and discusses various case studies that offer an important account of penality of a particular society. This mapping of varying forms and characteristics of penality provides an opportunity to intellectually visualise this nature of research specifically, thereby drawing implications for the applicability of ‘Punishment and Society’ in South Korean contexts. Within this comprehensive map of penality, the contemporary SK penality can be located and understood more distinctly from a comparative perspective, and; Second, this article briefly summarises the concept of penal populism and specific features around penal populism in SK, as one of the most clearly pronounced forces that constitutes the contemporary penality in this country.

Abstract

Historical research of penality, the sociology of punishment, or so-called the scholarship of ‘Punishment and Society’ are reletively new. Nonetheless, research in this discipline has been remarkably successful for the recent three decades. Although a few scholars have pointed out the relavance/importance of the socio-historical perspective and social theories in explaining punishment in South Korea, existing literature on punishment conducted from this perspective is rarely found in this country. This article serves two purposes: First, it illustrates and discusses various case studies that offer an important account of penality of a particular society. This mapping of varying forms and characteristics of penality provides an opportunity to intellectually visualise this nature of research specifically, thereby drawing implications for the applicability of ‘Punishment and Society’ in South Korean contexts. Within this comprehensive map of penality, the contemporary SK penality can be located and understood more distinctly from a comparative perspective, and; Second, this article briefly summarises the concept of penal populism and specific features around penal populism in SK, as one of the most clearly pronounced forces that constitutes the contemporary penality in this country.

참고문헌 (63)

  1. Barker, Vanessa., "Nordic Exceptionalism Revisited : Explaining the Paradox of a Janus-faced Penal Regime", Theoretical Criminology, 17, pp.5~25 (2012)
  2. Bottoms, Anthony, "The Politics of Sentencing Reform", pp.17~49 (1995), Clarendon
  3. Campbell, Michael, "The Emergence of Penal Extremism in California : A Dynamic View of Institutional Structures and Political Processes", Law & Society, 48(2), pp.377~409 (2014)
  4. Cavadino, Michael, "Penal Policy and Political Economy", Criminology & Criminal Justice, 6(4), pp.435~456 (2006)
  5. 최우철, "‘중형선고’ 논란에 따른 형벌포퓰리즘에 대한 실증 연구 : 비정형 빅데이터 분석방법론의 적용", 한국범죄학, 15(1), pp.131~148 (2021), 대한범죄학회
  6. Choo, Jihyun, "Democratization of the Justice and Punitiveness", pp.2017
  7. 추지현, "“성폭력을 엄벌하다”: 2000년대 성폭력 정책 담론의 구조와 효과", 한국여성학, 30(3), pp.45~84 (2014), 한국여성학회
  8. Demker, Marie, "Fear and Punishment in Sweden", Punishment & Society, 10(3), pp.319~332 (2008)
  9. Evans, Jessica., "Penal Nationalism in the Settler Colony : On the Construction and Maintenance of ‘National Whiteness’ in Settler Canada", Punishment & Society, 23(4), pp.515~535 (2021)
  10. Fenwick, Mark., "‘Penal Populism’ and Penological Change in Contemporary Japan", Theoretical Criminology, 17(2), pp.215~231 (2013)
  11. Fonseca, David., "Expansion, Standardization, and Densification of the Criminal Justice Apparatus : Recent Developments in Brazil", Punishment & Society, 20(3), pp.329~350 (2018)
  12. Garland, David, "Punishment and Welfare: A History of Penal Strategies" (1985), Ashgate
  13. Garland, David, "Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory" (1990), Oxford University Press
  14. Garland, David, "The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society" (2001), Oxford University Press
  15. Garland, David, "Concepts of Culture in the Sociology of Punishment", Theoretical Criminology, 10(4), pp.419~447 (2006)
  16. Garland, David, "Penality and the Penal State", Criminology, 51(3), pp.475~517 (2013)
  17. Garland, David, "Theoretical Advances and Problems in the Sociology of Punishment", Punishment & Society, 20(1), pp.8~33 (2018)
  18. Garland, David, "Punishment and Welfare Revisited", Punishment &Society, 21(3), pp.267~274 (2019)
  19. Garland, David, "Penal controls and social controls : Toward a theory of American penal exceptionalism", Punishment & Society, 22(3), pp.321~352 (2020)
  20. Garland, David, "Criminology and Social Theory, Oxford" (2021), Oxford University Press
  21. Hamai, Koichi, "Crime and Criminal Justice in Modern Japan: From Re-integrative Shaming to Popular Punitivism", International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 34, pp.157~178 (2006)
  22. Han, Inseob., "Theory and Practice of Social Control" (1998), Nanam
  23. Korea Institute of Justice, "Crime White Paper 2005" (2006), Ministry of Justice
  24. Korea Institute of Justice, "Crime White Paper 2006" (2007), Ministry of Justice
  25. Korea Institute of Justice, "Crime White Paper 2010" (2011), Ministry of Justice
  26. Korea Institute of Justice, "Crime White Paper 2012" (2013), Ministry of Justice
  27. Korea Institute of Justice, "Crime White Paper 2018" (2019), Ministry of Justice
  28. Johnson, David, "The Sage Handbook of Modern Japanese Studies", pp.222~262 (2014), Sage
  29. 김은경, "성폭력, 누구에 대한 어떤 공포인가: 언론의 성폭력 재현과 젠더질서의 재생산", 미디어, 젠더 & 문화, 30(2), pp.5~38 (2015), 한국여성커뮤니케이션학회
  30. 고비환, "선정적 범죄보도가 중형주의에 미치는 영향과 그 완화책으로서 사회적 관용의 필요성", 법학논총, 32(2), pp.399~424 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
  31. 권인숙, "성폭력 두려움과 사회통제:언론의 아동 성폭력 사건 대응을 중심으로", 아시아여성연구, 50(2), pp.85~118 (2011), 아시아여성연구원
  32. Lacey, Nicola, "Understanding the Determinants of Penal Policy : Crime, Culture, and Comparative Political Economy", Annual Review of Criminology, 1, pp.195~217 (2018)
  33. Lee, Hun Young, "A Punitive but Non-punitive Society: An Explanation of the Specificity of Penal Populism in South Korea", pp.2020
  34. Li, Enshen., "The Cultural Idiosyncrasy of Penal Populism: The Case of Contemporary China", British Journal of Criminology, 55, pp.146~163 (2015)
  35. Li, Enshen., "Penological Developments in Contemporary China:Populist Punitiveness vs. Penal Professionalism", International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 51, pp.58~71 (2017)
  36. Miao, Michelle., "Capital Punishment in China: A Populism Instrument of Social Governance", Theoretical Criminology, 17(2), pp.233~250 (2013)
  37. Miao, Michelle., "The Politics of China’s Death Penalty Reform in the Context of Global Abolitionism", British Journal of Criminology, 53(3), pp.500~519 (2013)
  38. Miyazawa, Setsuo, "The Politics of Increasing Punitiveness and the Rising Populism in Japanese Criminal Justice Policy", Punishment & Society, 10(1), pp.47~77 (2008)
  39. Nelken, David, "Beyond Law in Context: Developing a Sociological Understanding of Law" (2009), Routledge
  40. Nelken, David., "Foil Comparisons or Foiled Comparisons? Learning from Italian Juvenile Justice", European Journal of Criminology, 12(5), pp.519~534 (2015)
  41. Newburn, Tim, "Tough on Crime : Penal Policy in England and Wales", Crime and Justice, 36(1), pp.425~470 (1997)
  42. Pakes, Francis, "The Transnational Prisoner : Exploring Themes and Trends Involving a Prison Deal with the Netherlands and Norway", British Journal of Criminology, 57, pp.79~93 (2017)
  43. 박지선, "언론의 범죄 관련 보도가 대중의 범죄 발생 인식에 미치는 영향", 경찰학논총, 8(1), pp.295~316 (2013), 경찰학연구소[DOI]
  44. Pratt, John, "Penal Populism" (2007), Routledge
  45. Pratt, John., "Scandinavian Exceptionalism in an Era of Penal Excess – Part 1: The Nature and Roots of Scandinavian Exceptionalism", British Journal of Criminology, 48, pp.119~137 (2008)
  46. Pratt, John, "Scandinavian Exceptionalism in an Era of Penal Excess – Part 2 : Does Scandinavian Exceptionalism Have a Future?", British Journal of Criminology, 48, pp.275~292 (2008)
  47. Pratt, John, "Contrasts in Punishment: An Explanation of Anglophone Excess and Nordic Exceptionalism" (2013), Routledge
  48. Pratt, John, "Penal Populism : The End of Reason", Nova Criminis, 9(13), pp.71~105 (2017)
  49. Pratt, John, "Elgar Encyclopedia of Crime and Criminal Justice" (2023), Edward Elgar Publishing
  50. Roberts, Julian, "Penal Populism and Public Opinion: Lessons from Five Countries" (2003), Oxford University Press
  51. Seto, Christopher, "Religious Perceptions of Crime and Implications for Punitiveness", Punishment & Society, 24(1), pp.46~68 (2022)
  52. Smith, Peter Scharff, "Scandinavian Penal History, Culture and Prison Practice" (2017), Palgrave Macmillan
  53. Smolej, Mirka, "The Relationship Between Crime News and Fear of Violence", Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 7(2), pp.211~224 (2006)
  54. Sozzo, Maximo., "Democratization, Politics and Punishment in Argentina", Punishment & Society, 18(3), pp.301~324 (2016)
  55. Tripkovic, Milena, "Beyond Punitiveness? Governance of Crime and Authoritarian Heritage in Serbia", Punishment & Society, 18(3), pp.369~386 (2016)
  56. Todd-Kvam, John, "Bordered Penal Populism : When Populism and Scandinavian Exceptionalism Meet", Punishment & Society, 21(3), pp.1~20 (2019)
  57. Tonry, Michael, "Is Cross-national and Comparative Research on the Criminal Justice System Useful?", European Journal of Criminology, 12(4), pp.505~516 (2015)
  58. Wacquant, Loic, "Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity" (2009), Duke University Press
  59. Webster, Cheryl, "Penal Reform ‘Canadian style’ : Fiscal Responsibility and Decarceration in Alberta, Canada", Punishment & Society, 16(1), pp.3~31 (2014)
  60. Xu, Jianhua, "Legitimization Imperative : The Production of Crime Statistics in Guangzhou, China", British Journal of Criminology, 58, pp.155~176 (2018)
  61. 양정혜, "뉴스 미디어가 재현하는 범죄현실 : 아동대상 성폭력 범죄의 프레이밍", 언론과학연구, 10(2), pp.343~379 (2010), 한국지역언론학회
  62. Yoon, Okkyung, "The Economy, Political Repression and Prosecutions in Korea, 1964-1993", presented at the International Congress on Criminology (1998)
  63. 윤옥경, "형벌의 사회적 맥락 : 형벌사회학적 접근", 교정연구, 30, pp.59~82 (2006), 한국교정학회

관련 논문AI추천

A Discussion on the Concept of Penal Populism이헌영아시아교정포럼 · 교정담론2023 · 제17권 제2호‘엄벌주의’는 없다?: 엄벌성과 형벌 포퓰리즘의 이론적 맥락이헌영한국교정학회 · 교정연구2024 · 제34권 제2호형벌의 사회적 맥락 : 형벌사회학적 접근윤옥경한국교정학회 · 교정연구2006 · 제30권 세계교정이념의 흐름과 한국교정 - 포스터모더니즘 범죄학이론을 중심으로-이백철한국교정학회 · 교정연구2003 · 제21권 韓國의 死刑執行 現況과 死刑制度 改善方向에 對한 再考 - 韓國의 死刑執行現況과 死刑代替刑의 檢討 -김인선한국비교형사법학회 · 비교형사법연구2004 · 제6권 제1호형사입법정책의 중벌주의적 관점에 대한 비판적 이해김성규국회입법조사처 · 입법과 정책2011 · 제3권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

단약중인 마약중독자의 치유와 회복에 관한질적 사례연구최미경pp. 1-31디지털 성범죄 감시단의 경험에 관한내러티브 탐구오은경, 김현숙pp. 33-66올바른 삶과 교정(correction)의 의미 -아우구스티누스의 교육이론을 중심으로-김영철pp. 67-85범죄자 처우로서의 원예치료 현황 및향후 도입방안손외철pp. 119-145배우자 살인 사건 양형판단에 영향을미치는 요인이수정, 최금나, 노주애pp. 147-183
원문 보기