미야자와 겐지(宮沢賢治)에게 있어 채식의 고찰 -「스물 엿새 밤(二十六夜)」과 「채식주의자 대축제(ビヂテリアン大祭)」를 중심으로-
A Study on the Vegetarian of Miyazawa Kenji : Focusing on Twenty-six days Night and Vegetarian Festival
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Investigation on awareness and vegetarian diet for the Tale of organisms, and also preached about the carnivores of sin "Twenty-six days night", and "Vegetarian Festival" in smooth not failed elements of the works, which revealed through the captain Vegetarian about investigated. Kenji is that plants recognized as a breed of humans or animals, like Buddha, while the killing is reluctant to admit that it has begun a vegetarian life, the dignity of animals and plants, but did not look in the same dimension. This is due to the accident of Kenji aware that an animal other than the human and the human is connected to a chain of yukdo(六道) transmigration. Kenji is that from spring 1918 to start a vegetarian life were fundamental reason is that the sin of killing off ryeotgi. But he also was not a practicing vegetarian thoroughly afterwards. He has never been carnivores himself in order to understand the other's mind. Of course, this is never to rationalize and never eating meat can not. For him Tale of meat has led to the denial of severance and society, only the results that have been unaware that one of his body more. The Tale of consciousness that there would be a contradiction to shoulder as a human being to live in the community is inherent. There's a vegetarian Kenji problem has not been resolved in his own thinking. Kenji is a growing belief in vegetarianism, but it is a solid, try the "Vegetarian Festival" was not trying to prove that it is theoretically possible to convince himself enough. Also not to be able to convince poor farmers around even in real life. Not only that, but that was not even his own family to be forced. For the same reason as above in "Twenty-six days night" and "Vegetarian Festival" is the act of deploying brutal killing animals and food of the story is that sin that I can look for cracks or reversed.
Abstract
Investigation on awareness and vegetarian diet for the Tale of organisms, and also preached about the carnivores of sin "Twenty-six days night", and "Vegetarian Festival" in smooth not failed elements of the works, which revealed through the captain Vegetarian about investigated. Kenji is that plants recognized as a breed of humans or animals, like Buddha, while the killing is reluctant to admit that it has begun a vegetarian life, the dignity of animals and plants, but did not look in the same dimension. This is due to the accident of Kenji aware that an animal other than the human and the human is connected to a chain of yukdo(六道) transmigration. Kenji is that from spring 1918 to start a vegetarian life were fundamental reason is that the sin of killing off ryeotgi. But he also was not a practicing vegetarian thoroughly afterwards. He has never been carnivores himself in order to understand the other's mind. Of course, this is never to rationalize and never eating meat can not. For him Tale of meat has led to the denial of severance and society, only the results that have been unaware that one of his body more. The Tale of consciousness that there would be a contradiction to shoulder as a human being to live in the community is inherent. There's a vegetarian Kenji problem has not been resolved in his own thinking. Kenji is a growing belief in vegetarianism, but it is a solid, try the "Vegetarian Festival" was not trying to prove that it is theoretically possible to convince himself enough. Also not to be able to convince poor farmers around even in real life. Not only that, but that was not even his own family to be forced. For the same reason as above in "Twenty-six days night" and "Vegetarian Festival" is the act of deploying brutal killing animals and food of the story is that sin that I can look for cracks or reversed.
참고문헌 (17)
- 구미래, "불교민속칼럼(38) : 불교와 육식(肉食)", 불교신문, ~ (2011)
- 마성, "불교는 육식을 금하는 종교인가ー상좌 불교와 대승불교의 식육관食肉觀 비교", 불교평론, 6(2), pp.237~ (2004), 불교평론사
- 고한범, "미야자와 겐지(宮沢賢治) 동화의 생태적 고찰 -초목국토실개성불(草木國土悉皆成佛)과 관련하여-", 일어일문학, (57), pp.255~275 (2013), 대한일어일문학회
- 天沢退二郎, "宮沢賢治全集 5", pp.529~ (1990), ちくま文庫
- 伊藤真一郎, "宮沢賢治の '食' の原風景", 賢治研究, 70, pp.16~21 (1996), 宮沢賢治研究会
- 金戸清高, "宮沢賢治『ビヂテリアン大祭』論(一)-その宗教性に触れつつ-", 紀要visio, 41, pp.33~34 (2011), 九州ルーテル学院大学
- 北川透, "宮沢賢治", pp.194~ (1983), 思潮社
- 佐藤勝治, "宮沢賢治入門-宗教詩人宮沢賢治とその批判-", pp.97~ (1974), 十字屋書房
- 佐藤隆房, "宮沢賢治", pp.55~56 (1974), 富山房
- 佐藤成, "教諭 宮沢賢治 賢治と花巻農学校", pp.240~ (1982), 岩手県立花巻農業高等学校同窓会
- 菅谷規矩雄, "宮沢賢治序説", pp.83~84 (1980), 大和書房
- 関登久也, "宮沢賢治素描", pp.31~32 (1943), 協栄出版社
- 鶴田静, "ベジタリアン宮沢賢治", pp.257~ (1999), 晶文社
- 続橋達雄, "宮沢賢治必携", pp.138~ (1980), 学灯社
- 中村稔, "宮沢賢治", pp.5~279 (1972), 筑摩書房
- 八重樫祈美子, "花巻・人と町のプロフィル", 宮沢賢治研究資料集成, 1, pp.311~ (2000), 日本図書センター
- 和田利男, "宮沢賢治の童話文学", pp.53~54 (1959), 不信社
