텔레비전 논쟁의 대화 분석-‘대통령과 평검사의 대화’를 대상으로-

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe disputing aspects of televised dispute which is classified as an open-public-cross examination type of dispute, and to prescribe better arbitrating methods for the participants. To this end, I analyzed famous televised dispute(case of ‘conversation between the President and the Public Procurators’) using conversation analysis. For the purpose of analysing the arbitrating processes of the dispute, I approached the dispute by looking at three aspects: Ideational, Textual, Interpersonal Aspect. In ideational aspect, I analyzed the clash of goals, the collisions of footings and viewpoints, the clash of interests, the cultural contexts of the dispute, and prescribed better dispute methods for participants. In textual aspect, I analyzed the exchange structure and the coherence of the dispute, and prescribed better dispute methods for participants. In interpersonal aspect, I analyzed the participation frameworks, the role, the path structure of the dispute, and prescribed better dispute methods for the participants.