본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

토론 담화에서의 말차례 끼어들기와 유지하기 양상 -텔레비전 토론 프로그램을 대상으로

A Study on the pattern of turn-taking interruption and maintenance in TV debate

0

조회

0

다운로드

19

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The process of ‘turn-taking’ in oral communication reflect a cognitive process of human activity. The turn-taking is a one of the ‘move’ phenomenon. This study is concentrated on the debate that have been broadcasted on the TV. The debate usually shows the prototype of the spiritual fight. Therefore we can find the strategies of the use of language through the debate program. There are three kinds of Intruding in dialog. One of them is the intentional aspect, another is the accidental aspect and the rest is neutral aspect. The turn-taking retaining also have three aspects. They are to ignore an opponent, appeal a dialog rule, and respond something shortly. The intentional intruding have an effect on strategic attack against the others. And the accidental intruding is in connection with misunderstanding about transition relevance point. The neutral aspect is mainly revealed by the chairman.

Abstract

The process of ‘turn-taking’ in oral communication reflect a cognitive process of human activity. The turn-taking is a one of the ‘move’ phenomenon. This study is concentrated on the debate that have been broadcasted on the TV. The debate usually shows the prototype of the spiritual fight. Therefore we can find the strategies of the use of language through the debate program. There are three kinds of Intruding in dialog. One of them is the intentional aspect, another is the accidental aspect and the rest is neutral aspect. The turn-taking retaining also have three aspects. They are to ignore an opponent, appeal a dialog rule, and respond something shortly. The intentional intruding have an effect on strategic attack against the others. And the accidental intruding is in connection with misunderstanding about transition relevance point. The neutral aspect is mainly revealed by the chairman.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 고창규, "‘바다’초등학교 수업의 말차례 가지기 규칙", 교육사회학연구, 10(11), pp.1~20 (2000), 한국교육사회학회
  2. 김순자, "말차례 뺏기에 나타난 남녀 화자의 특징", 화법연구, 2, pp.61~92 (2000), 한국화법학회
  3. 김흥자, "말중단시키기(Unterbrechung)의 담화기능과 성", 언어과학연구, 26, pp.71~102 (2003), 언어과학회
  4. 박용찬, "우리말이 아파요" (2005), 해냄
  5. 박용한, "토론 대화 전략 연구" (2003), 역락
  6. 박정진, "국어 수업의 질문활동 연구" (2008), 한국문화사
  7. 송경숙, "담화분석: 대화 및 토론 분석의 실제" (2002), 한국문화사
  8. 엄순천, "남성발화와 여성발화의 변별성: 러시아어 일상대화체 장르에서 말 끼어들기 담화전략과 담화맥락을 중심으로", 한국노어노문학회 2007년도 춘계 정기논문발표회, pp.15~28 (2007), 한국노어노문학회
  9. 유동엽, "대화 참여자의 대화전략에 관한 연구 -상호작용을 위한 대화를 중심으로-", 석사, pp.1997
  10. 이원표, "토크쇼에서의 말 끼어들기: 담화 기능과 사회적 요인", 담화와 인지, 6(2), pp.23~59 (1999), 담화인지언어학회
  11. 임규홍, "국어 담화의 ‘끼어들기’ 유형에 대한 연구", 언어과학연구, 20, pp.321~352 (2001), 언어과학회
  12. 조태린, "차별적, 비객관적 언어 표현 개선을 위한 기초 연구" (2006), 국립국어원
  13. Mehan, H., "Learning Lesson: Social organization in the classroom" (1979), Harvard
  14. Sacks, H., "A simplest systemics for the organization of turn-taking", Language, 50, pp.696~735 (1974)
  15. Sinclair, J., "The English used by Teachers and Pupils" (1975), Oxford University

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)