보편언어와 번역공간
The universal language and translative space
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study proposes a concept of translative space, according to which we would like to reexamine the validity of the notion of universal language in Translation Studies. Our working hypothesis is that universal language is a background-language against which this or that figure-language takes form and shape. By translative space, we mean especially three things: border space, indeterminate space and potential space. Border space is a space opening up while translating from one language into another. From a semantic point of view, this space remains indeterminate until a decision has been taken. In other words, this space is full of potentialities, from which follows the conclusion that a retranslation is always possible. Our main idea is that the universal-particular dialectic which determines the debate on the possibility of universal language is to be reformulated in terms of background-figure dialectic. From this perspective, we attempt to translate the concept of pure language by Benjamin in terms of background-language.
Abstract
This study proposes a concept of translative space, according to which we would like to reexamine the validity of the notion of universal language in Translation Studies. Our working hypothesis is that universal language is a background-language against which this or that figure-language takes form and shape. By translative space, we mean especially three things: border space, indeterminate space and potential space. Border space is a space opening up while translating from one language into another. From a semantic point of view, this space remains indeterminate until a decision has been taken. In other words, this space is full of potentialities, from which follows the conclusion that a retranslation is always possible. Our main idea is that the universal-particular dialectic which determines the debate on the possibility of universal language is to be reformulated in terms of background-figure dialectic. From this perspective, we attempt to translate the concept of pure language by Benjamin in terms of background-language.
참고문헌 (15)
- 김상환, "차이와 반복" (2004), 민음사
- 김운찬, "번역한다는 것" (2010), 열린책들
- 백종현, "판단력비판" (2009), 아카넷
- 윤성우, "번역과 문자" (2011), 철학과현실사
- 정회성, "1984" (2007), 민음사
- 주형일, "미학 안의 불편함" (2008), 인간사랑
- 진태원, "법의 힘" (2004), 문학과지성사
- Benjamin W., "La tache du traducteur", pp.244~262 (1972), Gallimard
- Greimas A.J, "Sémiotique des passions" (1991), Seuil
- Lotman Y., "La sémiosphère" (1999), PULIM
- Nouss A., "Dans la ruine de Babel : poésie et traduction chez Paul Celan", TTR, 9, pp.15~54 (1996)
- Racine J., "Phèdre et Hippolyte, In Oeuvres complètes" (1999), Gallimard
- Shin J., "La traduction comme trans-sémiosis: un essai de sémiotique pour une typologie de la traduction", KODIKAS, 2011, pp.34(1), 27~40[DOI]
- Swift J., "Gulliver’s Travels" (1986), Oxford University Press
- Tymoczko M., "Ideology and the Position of the Translator: In What Sense is a Translator “In Between?”, Apropos of Ideology", Studies on Ideology-Ideologies in Translation Studies, pp.181~201 (2003), St. Jerome
