‘은주시청합기’와 ‘개정일본여지노정전도’에 대한 재해석 -죽도문제연구회(시모조 마사오)의 날조를 비판하면서-
A New Interpretation of ‘Eunjusicheonghabgi’ and ‘Geajeoungyeogyrojeoungzendo’ -A Critique on the fabrication by Takeshima Issue Research Group(Shimozo Masao)-
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Historically, Dokdo is a Korean territory. However, Japan has been repeatedly claim the islet. Japan cites the texts "EUNJUSICHEONGHABGI(隠州視聴合記)" and "GEAJEOUNGYEOGYROJEOUNGZENDO(改正日本輿地路程全圖) as evidence for its territorial claim. In fact, both of these ancient texts are proof that it is actually a Korean territory. Originally in "EUNJUSICHEONGHABGI(隠州視聴合記)", the northwestern border of Japan is called Oki Island. In "EUNJUSICHEONGHABGI(隠州視聴合記)", however, Japan insists that the northwestern border of Japan is Ulleung Island. Also, they argue that those texts provide evidence that Ulleungdo and Dokdo were Japanese territories. In fact, both scripts suggest that Ulleung Island and Dokdo belong to Korea. Because, in "GEAJEOUNGYEOGYROJEOUNGZENDO(改正日本與地路程全圖), Japanese territory is painted with colors and longitudinal lines, while Ulleungdo and Dokdo are not colored. There are two different maps in "GEAJEOUNGYEOGYROJEOUNGZENDO(改正日本與地路程全圖). The map made in 1779 is authentic. The map presented by Japan in 1846 is a replica. While the original map has evidence of Korean sovereignty over the islands, the replica has no such evidence. Therefore, Japan's territorial claims lose historical foundation with these texts.
Abstract
Historically, Dokdo is a Korean territory. However, Japan has been repeatedly claim the islet. Japan cites the texts "EUNJUSICHEONGHABGI(隠州視聴合記)" and "GEAJEOUNGYEOGYROJEOUNGZENDO(改正日本輿地路程全圖) as evidence for its territorial claim. In fact, both of these ancient texts are proof that it is actually a Korean territory. Originally in "EUNJUSICHEONGHABGI(隠州視聴合記)", the northwestern border of Japan is called Oki Island. In "EUNJUSICHEONGHABGI(隠州視聴合記)", however, Japan insists that the northwestern border of Japan is Ulleung Island. Also, they argue that those texts provide evidence that Ulleungdo and Dokdo were Japanese territories. In fact, both scripts suggest that Ulleung Island and Dokdo belong to Korea. Because, in "GEAJEOUNGYEOGYROJEOUNGZENDO(改正日本與地路程全圖), Japanese territory is painted with colors and longitudinal lines, while Ulleungdo and Dokdo are not colored. There are two different maps in "GEAJEOUNGYEOGYROJEOUNGZENDO(改正日本與地路程全圖). The map made in 1779 is authentic. The map presented by Japan in 1846 is a replica. While the original map has evidence of Korean sovereignty over the islands, the replica has no such evidence. Therefore, Japan's territorial claims lose historical foundation with these texts.
참고문헌 (26)
- 구보이 노리오, "'개정 일본여지노정전도'의 변화와 영유권 분석", 독도 관련 일본 발행지도학술회의, pp.2~21 (2016)
- 김호동, "한일 양국에서 누가 먼저 ‘독도’를 인지하였는가 -일본 외무성의 竹島 홍보 팸플릿의 포인트 1, 2 비판-", 민족문화논총, (44), pp.3~33 (2010), 민족문화연구소
- 남영우, "독도에 대한 일본의 지도제작과 측량", 영토해양연구, (7), pp.26~51 (2014)
- 송병기, "鬱陵島와 獨島" (1999), 단국대학교출판부
- 신용하, "독도의 민족영토사연구", pp.29~42 (1996), 지식산업사
- 이상태, "일본 고지도가 증명하는 독도 영유권", 독도연구, 15, pp.57~96 (2013)
- 최재영, "「개정일본여지노정전도(改正日本與地路程全圖)」의 제작배경과 독도영유권적 가치", 한국지리학회지, 7(3), pp.387~397 (2018), 한국지리학회[DOI]
- 최서면, "한·일간의 역사문제: 독도문제를 중심으로", 일본학, (24), pp.1~25 (2005)
- 최영성, "일본의 고문헌을 통해 본 독도‑『隱州視聽合記』와 「개정일본여지노정전도」를 중심으로 ‑", 한국사상과 문화, (84), pp.169~196 (2016), 한국사상문화학회
- 하도겸, "한일 간 역사전쟁 : 독도 그 불편한 진실- 독도 영유권 문제를 둘러싼 한･일 양국 간 정부입장(Ⅰ･Ⅱ)에 대한 검토-", 韓國史學史學報, (25), pp.145~180 (2012), 한국사학사학회[DOI]
- 池内敏, "竹島問題とは何か", pp.44~50 (2012)
- 奥原碧雲, "竹島及鬱陵島" (2005), ハーベスト出版
- 梶村秀樹, "竹島＝独島問題と日本国家", 朝鮮研究, (182) (1978)
- 内藤正中, "歴史的検証独島・竹島" (2007), 岩波書店
- 内藤正中, "竹島＝独島論争ー歴史から考えるー" (2007), 新幹社
- 堀和生, "1905年日本の竹島領土編入", 朝鮮史研究会論文集, (24) (1987)
- 山辺健太郎, "竹島問題の歴史的展開", コリア評論, 7(2) (1965)